Effect of softening function on the cohesive crack fracture parameters of concrete CT specimen

被引:16
作者
Kumar, Shailendra [1 ]
Barai, S. V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Kharagpur 721302, W Bengal, India
来源
SADHANA-ACADEMY PROCEEDINGS IN ENGINEERING SCIENCES | 2009年 / 34卷 / 06期
关键词
Fracture process zone; cohesive crack method; softening function; compact tension test; size effect; QUASI-BRITTLE FRACTURE; DOUBLE-K CRITERION; PLAIN CONCRETE; REINFORCED-CONCRETE; NONLINEAR FRACTURE; PART II; PROPAGATION; SIZE; TOUGHNESS; MECHANICS;
D O I
10.1007/s12046-009-0059-0
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The paper presents numerical study on the fracture parameters of concrete compact tension test specimens of different sizes using cohesive crack model. As softening function is the main ingredient of the cohesive crack model, seven numbers of widely used softening functions are incorporated in the model based on enhanced algorithm. It is found that the difference between the highest and the lowest peak loads obtained using various softening functions (except linear) is less than about 9%. The peak load predicted by the linear softening curve is about 16% larger than that of mean peak load predicted by other softening functions. The cohesive crack model with linear softening yields the fracture process zones lower by approximately 30-50% than those obtained by using the other softening relations for specimen size range 200-600 mm. The numerical results are further compared with a reference test result available in the literature. It is observed that some of softening relations (except linear) predict the experimentally obtained peak load up to 6% of accuracy whereas the linear softening curve overestimates it by about 30%. The numerically gained softening branch of load-displacement curves compare well with the experimental observation.
引用
收藏
页码:987 / 1015
页数:29
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   A finite element analysis of non-prescribed crack propagation in concrete [J].
Alfaiate, J ;
Pires, EB ;
Martins, JAC .
COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 1997, 63 (01) :17-26
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, American Standard for Testing and Materials, P1
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1985, MAT STRUCT, V18, P285, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF02472918
[4]  
Barenblatt G., 1959, APPL MATH MECH-ENGL, V23, P622, DOI 10.1016/0021-8928(59)90157-1
[5]  
BAZANT ZP, 1986, J STRUCT ENG-ASCE, V112, P289
[6]   Concrete fracture models: testing and practice [J].
Bazant, ZP .
ENGINEERING FRACTURE MECHANICS, 2002, 69 (02) :165-205
[7]  
Bazant ZP, 1983, Mater Et Constr, V16, P155, DOI [10.1007/BF02486267, DOI 10.1007/BF02486267]
[8]   MIXED-MODE FRACTURE OF CONCRETE [J].
BOCCA, P ;
CARPINTERI, A ;
VALENTE, S .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOLIDS AND STRUCTURES, 1991, 27 (09) :1139-1153
[9]   THE WEDGE SPLITTING TEST, A NEW METHOD OF PERFORMING STABLE FRACTURE-MECHANICS TESTS [J].
BRUHWILER, E ;
WITTMANN, FH .
ENGINEERING FRACTURE MECHANICS, 1990, 35 (1-3) :117-125
[10]   NUMERICAL-ANALYSIS OF CATASTROPHIC SOFTENING BEHAVIOR (SNAP-BACK INSTABILITY) [J].
CARPINTERI, A ;
COLOMBO, G .
COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 1989, 31 (04) :607-636