Do Firms' Slack Resources Influence the Relationship Between Focused Environmental Innovations and Financial Performance? More is Not Always Better

被引:134
作者
Leyva-de la Hiz, Dante I. [1 ]
Ferron-Vilchez, Vera [2 ]
Alberto Aragon-Correa, J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Montpellier Business Sch, Dept Entrepreneurship & Strategy, 2300 Ave Moulins, F-34185 Montpellier 4, France
[2] Univ Granada, Management Dept, C Cuesta Hosp S-N, E-18071 Granada, Spain
关键词
Environmental innovation; Focused innovation; Financial performance; Slack resources; Agency theory; CORPORATE SOCIAL PERFORMANCE; GREEN INNOVATION; US; AGENCY; TECHNOLOGY; GOVERNANCE; OWNERSHIP; KNOWLEDGE; PAY; DIVERSIFICATION;
D O I
10.1007/s10551-017-3772-3
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Environmental research has usually highlighted that the existence of slack resources in an organization helps allocate investment to innovative initiatives. However, the existing literature has paid very limited attention to how slack resources can influence the effects of focused and diversified innovations in different ways. Agency theory scholars claim that a manager's first preference when confronted with discretionary resources will not generate positive investments for the firm, but their own opportunistic preferences. The differences between focused and diversified environmental innovations allow us to gain a better understanding of the financial impact of being focused and how slack resources matter in this context. We analyze a longitudinal sample of 5845 environmental patents from the 75 largest companies in the electrical components and equipment industry worldwide. Our results show that high levels of slack resources reduce the existing positive relationship between focused environmental innovations and a firm's financial performance. These results contribute to delineating the theoretical and empirical implications of focused versus diversified environmental innovations and extend the literature on ethical dilemmas concerning managers' use of slack resources in the firm.
引用
收藏
页码:1215 / 1227
页数:13
相关论文
共 98 条
[1]   Why do managers diversify their firms? Agency reconsidered [J].
Aggarwal, RK ;
Samwick, AA .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2003, 58 (01) :71-118
[2]   Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: A longitudinal study [J].
Ahuja, G ;
Katila, R .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2001, 22 (03) :197-220
[3]   Drivers of R&D investment: The interaction of behavioral theory and managerial incentives [J].
Alessandri, Todd M. ;
Pattit, Jason M. .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2014, 67 (02) :151-158
[4]   RISK REDUCTION AS A MANAGERIAL MOTIVE FOR CONGLOMERATE MERGERS [J].
AMIHUD, Y ;
LEV, B .
BELL JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1981, 12 (02) :605-617
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2011, EC CHALL PATHW RES E
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2015, INNOVATIONS SUSTAINA
[7]  
Antolin-Lopez R., 2013, Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, V33, P1
[8]   Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): The Moderating Roles of Attainment Discrepancy and Organization Slack [J].
Arora, Punit ;
Dharwadkar, Ravi .
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW, 2011, 19 (02) :136-152
[9]   Is CEO pay in high-technology firms related to innovation? [J].
Balkin, DB ;
Markman, GD ;
Gomez-Mejia, LR .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2000, 43 (06) :1118-1129
[10]  
Bennett J, 2010, ENTREPRENEUR