Organised Versus Opportunistic Cervical Cancer Screening in Urban and Rural Regions of Lithuania

被引:17
作者
Paulauskiene, Justina [1 ]
Ivanauskiene, Rugile [1 ]
Skrodeniene, Erika [2 ]
Petkeviciene, Janina [1 ]
机构
[1] Lithuanian Univ Hlth Sci, Fac Publ Hlth, Med Acad, LT-47181 Kaunas, Lithuania
[2] Lithuanian Univ Hlth Sci, Dept Lab Med, Med Acad, LT-47181 Kaunas, Lithuania
来源
MEDICINA-LITHUANIA | 2019年 / 55卷 / 09期
关键词
cervical cancer; screening; place of residence; non-attendance; barriers; Lithuania; NON-ATTENDANCE; NON-ATTENDEES; INCREASE PARTICIPATION; COVERAGE; REASONS; PROGRAM; WOMEN;
D O I
10.3390/medicina55090570
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and Objectives: In 2004, Lithuania started the Nationwide Cervical Cancer Screening Programme. However, screening is more opportunistic than population-wide and the programme's coverage is insufficient. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of systematic personal invitation on coverage of cervical cancer (CC) screening in urban and rural regions of Lithuania. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted in an urban primary healthcare centre (PHCC) and in a rural PHCC, where prevailing CC screening practice was highly opportunistic. Over the first year, all women aged 25-60 who had not received a Pap smear test within the last three years in urban (n = 1591) and rural (n = 1843) PHCCs received a personal invitation letter to participate in the screening. Over the second year, the reminder letter was sent to the non-attendees (n = 1042 in urban and n = 929 in rural PHCCs). A random sample of women (n = 93), who did not attend for screening after two letters, was contacted by phone in order to identify the barriers of non-attendance. Results: Before the study, only 9.6% of the target population in urban and 14.7% in rural PHCCs participated in CC screening. After the first invitation letter, the participation in CC screening increased up to 24.6% in urban and 30.8% in rural areas (p < 0.001). After the reminder letter, the attendance was 16.4% in urban and 22.2% in rural PHCCs (p < 0.001). The most common barriers for the non-attendance were lack of time, long waiting time for family doctor's appointment, worries that a Pap test might be unpleasant and preventive gynaecological examination outside of the screening program. Conclusions: A systematic personal invitation with one reminder letter significantly increased the coverage of CC screening and was more effective in rural regions than in urban regions. The assessed barriers for non-attendance can be used to improve the coverage of screening.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Interventions to improve cervical cancer screening uptake amongst young women: A systematic review
    Albrow, Rebecca
    Blomberg, Karin
    Kitchener, Henry
    Brabin, Loretta
    Patnick, Julietta
    Tishelman, Carol
    Tornberg, Sven
    Sparen, Par
    Widmark, Catarina
    [J]. ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2014, 53 (04) : 445 - 451
  • [2] Cervical Carcinoma in the European Union An Update on Disease Burden, Screening Program State of Activation, and Coverage as of March 2014
    Altobelli, Emma
    Lattanzi, Amedeo
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2015, 25 (03) : 474 - 483
  • [3] Description of the national situation of cervical cancer screening in the member states of the European Union
    Anttila, Ahti
    Ronco, Guglielmo
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 45 (15) : 2685 - 2708
  • [4] European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Cervical Cancer Screening. Second Edition-Summary Document
    Arbyn, M.
    Anttila, A.
    Jordan, J.
    Ronco, G.
    Schenck, U.
    Segnan, N.
    Wiener, H.
    Herbert, A.
    von Karsa, L.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2010, 21 (03) : 448 - 458
  • [5] Trends of cervical cancer mortality in the member states of the European Union
    Arbyn, Marc
    Raifu, Amidu O.
    Weiderpass, Elisabete
    Bray, Freddie
    Anttila, Ahti
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 45 (15) : 2640 - 2648
  • [6] Reasons for non-attendance to cervical screening and preferences for HPV self-sampling in Dutch women
    Bosgraaf, Remko P.
    Ketelaars, Pleun J. W.
    Verhoef, Viola M. J.
    Massuger, Leon F. A. G.
    Meijer, Chris J. L. M.
    Melchers, Willem J. G.
    Bekkers, Ruud L. M.
    [J]. PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2014, 64 : 108 - 113
  • [7] Increasing participation in cervical cancer screening: Telephone contact with long-term non-attendees in Sweden. Results from RACOMIP, a randomized controlled trial
    Broberg, Gudrun
    Jonasson, Junmei Miao
    Ellis, Joy
    Gyrd-Hansen, Dorte
    Anjemark, Birgitta
    Glantz, Anna
    Soderberg, Lotta
    Ryd, Mare-Liis
    Holtenman, Mikael
    Milsom, Ian
    Strander, Bjorn
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 133 (01) : 164 - 171
  • [8] Methods to increase participation in organised screening programs: a systematic review
    Camilloni, Laura
    Ferroni, Eliana
    Cendales, Beatriz Jimenez
    Pezzarossi, Annamaria
    Furnari, Giacomo
    Borgia, Piero
    Guasticchi, Gabriella
    Rossi, Paolo Giorgi
    [J]. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2013, 13
  • [9] Eaker S, 2004, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V13, P346
  • [10] Narrowing the equity gap: the impact of organized versus opportunistic cancer screening in Catalonia (Spain)
    Espinas, Josep A.
    Aliste, Luisa
    Fernandez, Esteve
    Argimon, Josep M.
    Tresserras, Ricard
    Borras, Josep M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2011, 18 (02) : 87 - 90