Conventional fluid- and nanofluid-based photovoltaic thermal (PV/T) systems: a techno-economic and environmental analysis

被引:22
作者
Hussain, M. Imtiaz [1 ]
Kim, Jun-Tae [2 ]
机构
[1] Kongju Natl Univ, Green Energy Technol Res Ctr, Cheonan, South Korea
[2] Kongju Natl Univ, Dept Architectural Engn, Cheonan 330717, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Environmental analysis; mathematical model; nanofluid; PV/T system; techno-economic analysis; MODEL VALIDATION; COLLECTORS; SHEET;
D O I
10.1080/15435075.2018.1525558
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
In this study, the techno-economic impacts of nanofluids used as coolants to enhance the overall performance of a photovoltaic/thermal PV/T system, in comparison with conventional fluids, are discussed. A transient mathematical analysis was performed to evaluate the technical aspects and energy performance of the PV/T system. The proposed model is used to predict the annual thermal and electrical power outputs of a PV/T system based on CuO nanofluid, Al2O3 nanofluid, and conventional fluids. Economic and environmental analyses of the PV/T systems were performed by taking into account energy payback period, energy production factor, net CO2 mitigation, and net CO2 credit. Because of their greater energy unit area and levelized energy cost, nanofluid based PV/T systems have a lower payback period and better economic savings than those of conventional collectors. Using water, Al2O3 nanofluid, and CuO nanofluid, the net CO2 mitigation and net CO2 credit are 6.4tons and 156.8 USD, 6.9tons and 171.2 USD, and 7.4tons and 181.6 USD, respectively, for 30years life of the PV/T system. For typical industrial applications, PV/T systems with nanofluids should be considered as competitors to water-based PV/T collectors.
引用
收藏
页码:596 / 604
页数:9
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Comparative study to use nano-(Al2O3, CuO, and SiC) with water to enhance photovoltaic thermal PV/T collectors
    Ai-Waeli, Ali H. A.
    Chaichan, Miqdam T.
    Kazem, Hussein A.
    Sopian, K.
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 148 : 963 - 973
  • [2] Energy viability of photovoltaic systems
    Alsema, EA
    Nieuwlaar, E
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2000, 28 (14) : 999 - 1010
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1873, TREATISE ELECT MAGNE
  • [4] Life cycle energy metrics and CO2 credit analysis of a hybrid photovoltaic/thermal greenhouse dryer
    Barnwal, P.
    Tiwari, G. N.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LOW-CARBON TECHNOLOGIES, 2008, 3 (03) : 203 - 220
  • [5] Simulation and model validation of sheet and tube type photovoltaic thermal solar system and conventional solar collecting system in transient states
    Bhattarai, Sujala
    Oh, Jae-Heun
    Euh, Seung-Hee
    Kafle, Gopi Krishna
    Kim, Dae Hyun
    [J]. SOLAR ENERGY MATERIALS AND SOLAR CELLS, 2012, 103 : 184 - 193
  • [6] Bosanac M., 2003, Photovoltaic/ Thermal Solar Collectors and Their Potential in Denmark
  • [7] Performance analysis of photovoltaic-thermal collector by explicit dynamic model
    Chow, TT
    [J]. SOLAR ENERGY, 2003, 75 (02) : 143 - 152
  • [8] Clarke J. A., 2001, BUILDING SIMULATION, DOI [10.1016/B978-075065082-3/50003-6, DOI 10.1016/B978-075065082-3/50003-6]
  • [9] Drew D.A., 2006, Theory of Multicomponent Fluids, V135
  • [10] Frankl P, 1998, PROG PHOTOVOLTAICS, V6, P137, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-159X(199803/04)6:2<137::AID-PIP208>3.0.CO