Practical implementation of a modified continual reassessment method for dose-finding trials

被引:103
作者
Piantadosi, S
Fisher, JD
Grossman, S
机构
[1] NABTT CNS Consortium, Cent Operat Off, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Johns Hopkins Oncol Ctr, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
关键词
continual reassessment method; phase I trials; standard method (SM); glioblastoma; 9AC;
D O I
10.1007/s002800050763
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: We describe a practical, reliable, efficient dose-finding design for cytotoxic drugs applied in a multi-institutional setting, Methods: The continual reassessment method (CRM) was modified for use in phase I trials conducted through the New Approaches to Brain Tumor Therapy (NABTT) Consortium. Our implementation of the CRM uses (1) a simple dose-toxicity model to guide data interpolation, (2) groups of three patients to minimize calculations and stabilize estimates, (3) investigators' clinical knowledge or opinion in the form of data to make the process easier to understand, and (4) a flexible computer program and interface to facilitate calculations. Results: The modified CRM was used in two dose-finding trials of 9-aminocamptothecin in patients with newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma who were taking anticonvulsant medication. The CRM located the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) efficiently in both trials. Compared to conventional designs, the CRM required slightly more than half the number of patients expected. did not greatly overshoot the MTD (i.e. no patients were treated at dangerously high doses), and did not underestimate the MTD. Conclusions: Our experience demonstrates the feasibility of implementing this design in multi-institutional trials and the possibility of performing dose-finding studies that require fewer patients than conventional methods.
引用
收藏
页码:429 / 436
页数:8
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   A METHOD FOR OBTAINING AND ANALYZING SENSITIVITY DATA [J].
DIXON, WJ ;
MOOD, AM .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1948, 43 (241) :109-126
[2]   SOME PRACTICAL IMPROVEMENTS IN THE CONTINUAL REASSESSMENT METHOD FOR PHASE-I STUDIES [J].
GOODMAN, SN ;
ZAHURAK, ML ;
PIANTADOSI, S .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1995, 14 (11) :1149-1161
[3]  
GROSSMAN SA, 1997, P AN M AM SOC CLIN, V16, pA389
[4]   A COMPARISON OF 2 PHASE-I TRIAL DESIGNS [J].
KORN, EL ;
MIDTHUNE, D ;
CHEN, TT ;
RUBINSTEIN, LV ;
CHRISTIAN, MC ;
SIMON, RM .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1994, 13 (18) :1799-1806
[5]   CONTINUAL REASSESSMENT METHOD - A PRACTICAL DESIGN FOR PHASE-1 CLINICAL-TRIALS IN CANCER [J].
OQUIGLEY, J ;
PEPE, M ;
FISHER, L .
BIOMETRICS, 1990, 46 (01) :33-48
[6]  
Piantadosi S, 1996, STAT MED, V15, P1605, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960815)15:15<1605::AID-SIM325>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-2
[8]  
Piantadosi S, 1997, CLIN TRIALS METHODOL
[9]   STATISTICAL AND ETHICAL ISSUES IN THE DESIGN AND CONDUCT OF PHASE-I AND PHASE-II CLINICAL-TRIALS OF NEW ANTICANCER AGENTS [J].
RATAIN, MJ ;
MICK, R ;
SCHILSKY, RL ;
SIEGLER, M .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1993, 85 (20) :1637-1643
[10]   A STOCHASTIC APPROXIMATION METHOD [J].
ROBBINS, H ;
MONRO, S .
ANNALS OF MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS, 1951, 22 (03) :400-407