Gadolinium-enhanced dynamic magnetic resonance imaging with endorectal coil for local staging of rectal cancer

被引:12
作者
Tamakawa, Mitsuharu [1 ]
Kawaai, Yuriko [1 ]
Shirase, Ryuji [2 ]
Satoh, Taishi [1 ]
Akiba, Hidenari [1 ]
Hyodoh, Hideki [1 ]
Hareyama, Masato [1 ]
Furuhata, Tomohisa [3 ]
Hirata, Koichi [3 ]
Hasegawa, Tadashi [4 ]
机构
[1] Sapporo Med Univ, Dept Radiol, Chuo Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido 0608543, Japan
[2] Sapporo Med Univ Hosp, Div Radiol, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
[3] Sapporo Med Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg 1, Sapporo, Hokkaido 0608543, Japan
[4] Sapporo Med Univ Hosp, Div Clin Pathol, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
来源
JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY | 2010年 / 28卷 / 04期
关键词
Gd-enhanced dynamic MR imaging; Primary rectal carcinoma; Dynamic MRI criteria; Local staging; Endorectal coil; GADOPENTETATE DIMEGLUMINE; MR; CARCINOMA; RADIOTHERAPY; RECURRENCE; ULTRASOUND; SONOGRAPHY; SURVIVAL; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1007/s11604-010-0425-1
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of dynamic gadolinium (Gd)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with endorectal coil for assessing tumor invasion based on simple classification criteria. A total of 58 patients with operable primary rectal cancer underwent preoperative MRI. An enhancement pattern in Gd-enhanced dynamic MRI with regard to tumor penetration was clarified. Retrospectively, two observers independently scored T2-weighted MRI and T2-weighted MRI combined with Gd-enhanced dynamic MRI for tumor penetration using the following criteria: With Gd-enhanced dynamic MRI, T1 tumors showed an early enhanced line around the tumor as rim enhancement; T2 tumors appeared as black lines or double layers, as the muscularis propria kept its integrity; T3 tumors showed partial discontinuity of the muscularis propria as a dotted line and a perforated area as an interrupted line. A confidence level scoring system was used, and receiver operating characteristic curves were generated. There were no significant differences at the T1 stage. There were significant differences for observer 1 (P = 0.001 for observer 1) at the T2 stage. There were significant differences for both observers (P = 0.001 for observer 1 and P = 0.005 for observer 2) at the T3 stage. Our criteria for Gd-enhanced dynamic MRI were effective for T3 stage tumors.
引用
收藏
页码:290 / 298
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Usefulness of the dynamic gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging with simultaneous acquisition of coronal and sagittal planes for detection of pituitary microadenomas
    Lee, Han Bee
    Kim, Sung Tae
    Kim, Hyung-Jin
    Kim, Keon Ha
    Jeon, Pyoung
    Byun, Hong Sik
    Choi, Jin Wook
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2012, 22 (03) : 514 - 518
  • [22] Magnetic resonance imaging accuracy in assessing tumour down-staging following chemoradiation in rectal cancer
    Suppiah, A.
    Hunter, I. A.
    Cowley, J.
    Garimella, V.
    Cast, J.
    Hartley, J. E.
    Monson, J. R. T.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2009, 11 (03) : 249 - 253
  • [23] VALUE OF FAT SUPPRESSION IN GADOLINIUM-ENHANCED MAGNETIC RESONANCE NEUROIMAGING
    d'Anjou, Marc-Andre
    Carmel, Eric Norman
    Tidwell, Amy S.
    VETERINARY RADIOLOGY & ULTRASOUND, 2011, 52 (01) : S85 - S90
  • [24] Role of dynamic perfusion magnetic resonance imaging in patients with local advanced rectal cancer
    Ippolito, Davide
    Drago, Silvia Girolama
    Pecorelli, Anna
    Maino, Cesare
    Querques, Giulia
    Mariani, Ilaria
    Franzesi, Cammillo Talei
    Sironi, Sandro
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 26 (20)
  • [25] Role of dynamic perfusion magnetic resonance imaging in patients with local advanced rectal cancer
    Davide Ippolito
    Silvia Girolama Drago
    Anna Pecorelli
    Cesare Maino
    Giulia Querques
    Ilaria Mariani
    Sandro Sironi
    Cammillo Talei Franzesi
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2020, (20) : 2657 - 2668
  • [26] Effectiveness of preoperative staging in rectal cancer: digital rectal examination, endoluminal ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging?
    G Brown
    S Davies
    G T Williams
    M W Bourne
    R G Newcombe
    A G Radcliffe
    J Blethyn
    N S Dallimore
    B I Rees
    C J Phillips
    T S Maughan
    British Journal of Cancer, 2004, 91 : 23 - 29
  • [27] Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Rectal Cancer
    Dewhurst, Catherine E.
    Mortele, Koenraad J.
    RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2013, 51 (01) : 121 - +
  • [28] Effectiveness of preoperative staging in rectal cancer: digital rectal examination, endoluminal ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging?
    Brown, G
    Davies, S
    Williams, GT
    Bourne, MW
    Newcombe, RG
    Radcliffe, AG
    Blethyn, J
    Dallimore, NS
    Rees, BI
    Phillips, CJ
    Maughan, TS
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2004, 91 (01) : 23 - 29
  • [29] Reliability of gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging findings and their correlation with clinical outcome in patients with sciatica
    el Barzouhi, Abdelilah
    Vleggeert-Lankamp, Carmen L. A. M.
    Nijeholt, Geert J. Lycklama a
    van der Kallen, Bas F.
    van den Hout, Wilbert B.
    Koes, Bart W.
    Peul, Wilco C.
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2014, 14 (11) : 2598 - 2607
  • [30] Accuracy of High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Preoperative Staging of Rectal Cancer
    Akasu, Takayuki
    Iinuma, Gen
    Takawa, Masashi
    Yamamoto, Seiichiro
    Muramatsu, Yukio
    Moriyama, Noriyuki
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 16 (10) : 2787 - 2794