Human-Robot Interaction and User Manipulation

被引:4
作者
Bertolini, Andrea [1 ,2 ]
Carli, Rachele [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Scuola Super Sant Anna, DIRPOLIS Inst, Pisa, Italy
[2] Scuola Super Sant Anna, EURA European Ctr Excellence Regulat Robot & AI, Pisa, Italy
[3] Univ Bologna, Alma Mater Res Inst Human Ctr AI, Bologna, Italy
[4] Univ Luxembourg, AI RoboLab, ICR Grp, Esch Sur Alzette, Luxembourg
来源
PERSUASIVE TECHNOLOGY (PERSUASIVE 2022) | 2022年 / 13213卷
关键词
Social robotics; Manipulation; Human dignity; MACHINES;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-030-98438-0_4
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The analysis presented is focused on the interaction among social robots and humans. It is here stated that, despite the multidisciplinary debate around the theme, social robots have to be ontologically deemed objects. The pleasant design and the simulation of intelligence, as much as social and emotional competences, are useful to convey acceptability and to favour interaction. However, they may lead to forms ofmanipulation which can impact the users' will and undermine their physical and psychological integrity. This rises the need of a legal framework, able to guarantee a really human-centred development of new technologies and to ensure the protection of people involved in the interaction. Therefore, the recent European proposal of regulation, the Artificial Intelligence Act, is examined. In particular, the section on prohibited practices is critically analysed, so as to highlight the controversial aspects of such an approach. Thus, it is suggested the role of human dignity as a balancing principle to address the issues related to user manipulation in the human-robot interaction domain.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 57
页数:15
相关论文
共 74 条
[51]   The Robotic Archetype: Character Animation and Social Robotics [J].
Lacey, Cherie ;
Caudwell, Catherine Barbara .
SOCIAL ROBOTICS, ICSR 2018, 2018, 11357 :25-34
[52]  
Lotto B., 2017, PERCEZIONI COME CERV
[53]  
Luppicini R., 2008, HDB RES TECHNOETHICS
[54]   Effects of lateral head tilt on user perceptions of humanoid and android robots [J].
Mara, Martina ;
Appel, Markus .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2015, 44 :326-334
[55]   THE MYTH OF THE AWESOME THINKING MACHINE [J].
MARTIN, CD .
COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 1993, 36 (04) :120-133
[56]   The responsibility gap: Ascribing responsibility for the actions of learning automata [J].
Matthias A. .
Ethics and Information Technology, 2004, 6 (3) :175-183
[57]  
Miglino O., 2018, Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, V45, P131
[58]   Evolutionary algorithms for reinforcement learning [J].
Moriarty, DE ;
Schultz, AC ;
Grefenstette, JJ .
JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE RESEARCH, 1999, 11 :241-276
[59]   Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers [J].
Nass, C ;
Moon, Y .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ISSUES, 2000, 56 (01) :81-103
[60]  
Natale S., 2020, Working paper