Urgent need for post-growth climate mitigation scenarios

被引：141

作者：

Hickel, Jason ^{[1
,2
]}

Brockway, Paul ^{[3
]}

Kallis, Giorgos ^{[2
,4
]}

Keysser, Lorenz ^{[5
]}

Lenzen, Manfred ^{[6
]}

Slamersak, Aljosa ^{[2
]}

Steinberger, Julia ^{[7
]}

Urge-Vorsatz, Diana ^{[8
]}

机构：

[1] London Sch Econ, Int Inequal Inst, London, England

[2] Autonomous Univ Barcelona, ICTA, Barcelona, Spain

[3] Univ Leeds, Sch Earth & Environm, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England

[4] Autonomous Univ Barcelona, ICREA, Barcelona, Spain

[5] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Environm Decis, D USYS, Zurich, Switzerland

[6] Univ Sydney, Sch Phys, ISA, Sydney, NSW, Australia

[7] Univ Lausanne, Inst Geog & Sustainabil, Lausanne, Switzerland

[8] Cent European Univ, Dept Environm Sci & Policy, Budapest, Hungary

来源：

NATURE ENERGY | 2021年 / 6卷 / 08期

基金：

英国工程与自然科学研究理事会; 英国科研创新办公室;

关键词：

ENERGY; EMISSIONS;

D O I：

10.1038/s41560-021-00884-9

中图分类号：

TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];

学科分类号：

0807 ; 0820 ;

摘要：

Established climate mitigation scenarios assume continued economic growth in all countries, and reconcile this with the Paris targets by betting on speculative technological change. Post-growth approaches may make it easier to achieve rapid mitigation while improving social outcomes, and should be explored by climate modellers.

引用

页码：766 / 768

页数：3

共 32 条

[1] A factor of two: how the mitigation plans of 'climate progressive' nations fall far short of Paris-compliant pathways [J].

Anderson, Kevin ;

Broderick, John F. ;

Stoddard, Isak .

CLIMATE POLICY, 2020, 20 (10) :1290-1304

[2]

[Anonymous], 2012, GLOBAL ENERGY ASSESS

[3]

[Anonymous], 2018, EASAC policy report 35

[4] Energy efficiency and economy-wide rebound effects: A review of the evidence and its implications [J].

Brockway, Paul E. ;

Sorrell, Steve ;

Semieniuk, Gregor ;

Heun, Matthew Kuperus ;

Court, Victor .

RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2021, 141

[5] Considering sustainability thresholds for BECCS in IPCC and biodiversity assessments [J].

Creutzig, Felix ;

Erb, Karl-Heinz ;

Haberl, Helmut ;

Hof, Christian ;

Hunsberger, Carol ;

Roe, Stephanie .

GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 2021, 13 (04) :510-515

[6] Energy transition towards economic and environmental sustainability: feasible paths and policy implications [J].

D'Alessandro S. ;

Luzzati T. ;

Morroni M. .

Journal of Cleaner Production, 2010, 18 (04) :291-298

[7] Feasible alternatives to green growth [J].

D’Alessandro S. ;

Cieplinski A. ;

Distefano T. ;

Dittmer K. .

Nature Sustain., 2020, 4 (329-335) :329-335

[8] Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage: Issues and Prospects [J].

de Coninck, Heleen ;

Benson, Sally M. .

ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, VOL 39, 2014, 39 :243-270

[9]

Fix B., 2019, BioPhysical Economics and Resource Quality, V4, P6, DOI DOI 10.1007/S41247-019-0054-Y

[10] A low energy demand scenario for meeting the 1.5°C target and sustainable development goals without negative emission technologies [J].

Grubler, Arnulf ;

Wilson, Charlie ;

Bento, Nuno ;

Boza-Kiss, Benigna ;

Krey, Volker ;

McCollum, David L. ;

Rao, Narasimha D. ;

Riahi, Keywan ;

Rogelj, Joeri ;

De Stercke, Simon ;

Cullen, Jonathan ;

Frank, Stefan ;

Fricko, Oliver ;

Guo, Fei ;

Gidden, Matt ;

Havlik, Petr ;

Huppmann, Daniel ;

Kiesewetter, Gregor ;

Rafaj, Peter ;

Schoepp, Wolfgang ;

Valin, Hugo .

NATURE ENERGY, 2018, 3 (06) :515-527

← 1 2 3 4 →