Preventive vaccination contributes to control classical swine fever in wild boar (Sus scrofa sp.)

被引:45
|
作者
Rossi, S. [1 ]
Pol, F. [2 ]
Forot, B. [1 ]
Masse-provin, N. [3 ]
Rigaux, S. [4 ]
Bronner, A. [5 ]
Le Potier, M. -F. [2 ]
机构
[1] Game & Wildlife Agcy, Off Natl Chasse & Faune Sauvage, Unite Sanit Faune, Wildlife Sanit Unit, F-05000 Gap, France
[2] Natl Reference Lab Swine Fever Zoopole Les Croix, Unite Virol Immunol Porcines, LERAPP, AFSSA, F-22440 Ploufragan, France
[3] Direct Serv Vet Reg Task Force CSF, F-67200 Strasbourg, France
[4] Direct Serv Vet, F-57078 Metz, France
[5] Minist Agr, Direct Gen Alimentat, F-75000 Paris, France
关键词
Wild boar; Classical swine fever; Preventive vaccination; C-STRAIN VACCINE; RT-PCR ASSAY; ORAL IMMUNIZATION; POPULATIONS; PERSISTENCE; DIAGNOSIS; GERMANY; VIRUS; TRANSMISSION; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.09.050
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Over the last 20 years, oral vaccination implementing a live attenuated vaccine has been experimented in Europe in order to control classical swine fever (CSF) in Wild Boar (Sus scrofa sp.). This has generally led to an enhanced seroprevalence and a decreased viroprevalence at the scale of the whole vaccinated populations, but no quantitative analysis has demonstrated the protective effect of preventive vaccination or intensive baiting. In the present paper we conducted a retrospective analysis at the scale of the municipality, taking into account the local dynamics and possible covariates of infection to test the effect of preventive vaccination and of the baiting effort. To be efficient, vaccination was expected to increase seroprevalence above the level considered as suitable for preventing disease invasion (40-60%) independently of infection, to protect free areas from disease invasion or contribute to control subsequent disease intensity and duration. We also hypothesized that a better baiting effort would be correlated with an improvement of immunisation and disease control. In uninfected municipalities, seroprevalence increased up to 40% after 1 year, i.e., three vaccination campaigns. We observed a significant protective effect of preventive vaccination, especially within municipalities that had been vaccinated at least 1 year before disease emergence and where virus detection did not last more than one quarter. On the other hand, we did not detect a significant effect of the baiting effort on local seroprevalence or disease dynamics, suggesting that the baiting system could be improved. We discuss these results regarding the improvement of management measures and further research perspective. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 107
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Classical Swine Fever Virus vs. Classical Swine Fever Virus: The Superinfection Exclusion Phenomenon in Experimentally Infected Wild Boar
    Munoz-Gonzalez, Sara
    Perez-Simo, Marta
    Colom-Cadena, Andreu
    Cabezon, Oscar
    Alejandro Bohorquez, Jose
    Rosell, Rosa
    Josue Perez, Lester
    Marco, Ignasi
    Lavin, Santiago
    Domingo, Mariano
    Ganges, Llilianne
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (02):
  • [42] Estimation of the Lethality Rate, Recovery Rate, and Case Fatality Ratio of Classical Swine Fever in Japanese Wild Boar: An Analysis of the Epidemics From September 2018 to March 2019
    Matsuyama, Ryota
    Yamamoto, Takehisa
    Hayama, Yoko
    Omori, Ryosuke
    FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2021, 8
  • [43] Estimating waning immunity against classical swine fever virus among adult wild boar: A case study in Japan
    Matsuyama, Ryota
    Yamamoto, Takehisa
    Hayama, Yoko
    Omori, Ryosuke
    PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2025, 237
  • [44] Estimation of infection risk on pig farms in infected wild boar areas-Epidemiological analysis for the reemergence of classical swine fever in Japan in 2018
    Hayama, Yoko
    Shimizu, Yumiko
    Murato, Yoshinori
    Sawai, Kotaro
    Yamamoto, Takehisa
    PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2020, 175
  • [45] Hepatozoon apri n. sp (Adeleorina: Hepatozoidae) from the Japanese wild boar Sus scrofa leucomystax (Mammalia: Cetartiodactyla)
    Yamamoto, Mizuki
    Tokiwa, Toshihiro
    Tobiume, Miki
    Akamatsu, Shigeru
    Matsuo, Kayoko
    Moribe, Junji
    Ike, Kazunori
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR PARASITOLOGY-PARASITES AND WILDLIFE, 2017, 6 (03): : 354 - 360
  • [46] Tools and opportunities for African swine fever control in wild boar and feral pigs: a review
    Palencia, Pablo
    Blome, Sandra
    Brook, Ryan K.
    Ferroglio, Ezio
    Jo, Yeong-Seok
    Linden, Annick
    Montoro, Vidal
    Penrith, Mary-Louise
    Plhal, Radim
    Vicente, Joaquin
    Viltrop, Arvo
    Gortazar, Christian
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE RESEARCH, 2023, 69 (04)
  • [47] Transient classical swine fever virus infection in wild boar piglets partially protected by maternal antibodies
    Depner, KR
    Müller, T
    Lange, E
    Staubach, C
    Teuffert, J
    DEUTSCHE TIERARZTLICHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2000, 107 (02): : 66 - 68
  • [48] Mitochondrial DNA control region variability of wild boar Sus scrofa with various external phenotypes in Turkey
    Demirbas, Yasin
    Ozkan Koca, Ayca
    Pamukoglu, Nahit
    Sert, Hakan
    Suchentrunk, Franz
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 2016, 40 (06) : 957 - 971
  • [49] Fatty acid composition of wild boar (Sus scrofa scrofa) meat compared to commercial hybrid and crossbreed Mora Romagnola swine. A preliminary study
    Barbani, Roberto
    Bonilauri, Paolo
    Sangiorgi, Emanuele
    Marliani, Giovanna
    RIVISTA ITALIANA DELLE SOSTANZE GRASSE, 2020, 97 (01): : 7 - 14
  • [50] Modelling the effectiveness and risks of vaccination strategies to control classical swine fever epidemics
    Backer, Jantien A.
    Hagenaars, Thomas J.
    van Roermund, Herman J. W.
    de Jong, Mart C. M.
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY INTERFACE, 2009, 6 (39) : 849 - 861