Preventive vaccination contributes to control classical swine fever in wild boar (Sus scrofa sp.)

被引:45
|
作者
Rossi, S. [1 ]
Pol, F. [2 ]
Forot, B. [1 ]
Masse-provin, N. [3 ]
Rigaux, S. [4 ]
Bronner, A. [5 ]
Le Potier, M. -F. [2 ]
机构
[1] Game & Wildlife Agcy, Off Natl Chasse & Faune Sauvage, Unite Sanit Faune, Wildlife Sanit Unit, F-05000 Gap, France
[2] Natl Reference Lab Swine Fever Zoopole Les Croix, Unite Virol Immunol Porcines, LERAPP, AFSSA, F-22440 Ploufragan, France
[3] Direct Serv Vet Reg Task Force CSF, F-67200 Strasbourg, France
[4] Direct Serv Vet, F-57078 Metz, France
[5] Minist Agr, Direct Gen Alimentat, F-75000 Paris, France
关键词
Wild boar; Classical swine fever; Preventive vaccination; C-STRAIN VACCINE; RT-PCR ASSAY; ORAL IMMUNIZATION; POPULATIONS; PERSISTENCE; DIAGNOSIS; GERMANY; VIRUS; TRANSMISSION; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.09.050
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Over the last 20 years, oral vaccination implementing a live attenuated vaccine has been experimented in Europe in order to control classical swine fever (CSF) in Wild Boar (Sus scrofa sp.). This has generally led to an enhanced seroprevalence and a decreased viroprevalence at the scale of the whole vaccinated populations, but no quantitative analysis has demonstrated the protective effect of preventive vaccination or intensive baiting. In the present paper we conducted a retrospective analysis at the scale of the municipality, taking into account the local dynamics and possible covariates of infection to test the effect of preventive vaccination and of the baiting effort. To be efficient, vaccination was expected to increase seroprevalence above the level considered as suitable for preventing disease invasion (40-60%) independently of infection, to protect free areas from disease invasion or contribute to control subsequent disease intensity and duration. We also hypothesized that a better baiting effort would be correlated with an improvement of immunisation and disease control. In uninfected municipalities, seroprevalence increased up to 40% after 1 year, i.e., three vaccination campaigns. We observed a significant protective effect of preventive vaccination, especially within municipalities that had been vaccinated at least 1 year before disease emergence and where virus detection did not last more than one quarter. On the other hand, we did not detect a significant effect of the baiting effort on local seroprevalence or disease dynamics, suggesting that the baiting system could be improved. We discuss these results regarding the improvement of management measures and further research perspective. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 107
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Dynamics of Classical Swine Fever Spread in Wild Boar in 2018-2019, Japan
    Isoda, Norikazu
    Baba, Kairi
    Ito, Satoshi
    Ito, Mitsugi
    Sakoda, Yoshihiro
    Makita, Kohei
    PATHOGENS, 2020, 9 (02):
  • [32] Alternative sampling strategies for passive classical and African swine fever surveillance in wild boar
    Petrov, Anja
    Schotte, Ulrich
    Pietschmann, Jana
    Draeger, Carolin
    Beer, Martin
    Anheyer-Behmenburg, Helena
    Goller, Katja V.
    Blome, Sandra
    VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 2014, 173 (3-4) : 360 - 365
  • [33] Winter diet of wolf (Canis lupus) after the outbreak of African swine fever and under the severely reduced densities of wild boar (Sus scrofa)
    Valdmann, Harri
    Saarma, Urmas
    HYSTRIX-ITALIAN JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY, 2020, 31 (02): : 154 - 156
  • [34] Oral immunisation of wild boar against classical swine fever:: concluding analysis of the recent field trials in Germany
    Kaden, V
    Heyne, H
    Kiupel, H
    Letz, W
    Kern, B
    Lemmer, U
    Gossger, K
    Rothe, A
    Böhme, H
    Tyrpe, P
    BERLINER UND MUNCHENER TIERARZTLICHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2002, 115 (5-6): : 179 - 185
  • [35] Efficacy of Oral Vaccine against Classical Swine Fever in Wild Boar and Estimation of the Disease Dynamics in the Quantitative Approach
    Bazarragchaa, Enkhbold
    Isoda, Norikazu
    Kim, Taksoo
    Tetsuo, Madoka
    Ito, Satoshi
    Matsuno, Keita
    Sakoda, Yoshihiro
    VIRUSES-BASEL, 2021, 13 (02):
  • [36] Ecological drivers of African swine fever virus persistence in wild boar populations: Insight for control
    Pepin, Kim M.
    Golnar, Andrew J.
    Abdo, Zaid
    Podgorski, Tomasz
    ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2020, 10 (06): : 2846 - 2859
  • [37] Landscape elements affecting the ingestion of oral vaccine against classical swine fever in wild boar
    Tomohiko Endo
    Shigeki Hirata
    Yoko Hayama
    Yuuji Kodera
    Masahiko Takeuchi
    European Journal of Wildlife Research, 2023, 69
  • [38] Evaluation of the oral immunisation of wild boar against classical swine fever in Baden-Wuttemberg
    Kaden, V
    Renner, C
    Rothe, A
    Lange, E
    Hänel, A
    Gossger, K
    BERLINER UND MUNCHENER TIERARZTLICHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2003, 116 (9-10): : 362 - 367
  • [39] Diagnosis of classical swine fever infection in wild boar:: a comparison of different laboratory methods.
    Hergarten, G
    Hürter, KP
    Hess, RG
    DEUTSCHE TIERARZTLICHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2001, 108 (02): : 51 - 54
  • [40] Measuring impact of vaccination among wildlife: The case of bait vaccine campaigns for classical swine fever epidemic among wild boar in Japan
    Matsuyama, Ryota
    Yamamoto, Takehisa
    Hayama, Yoko
    Omori, Ryosuke
    PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2022, 18 (10)