Preventive vaccination contributes to control classical swine fever in wild boar (Sus scrofa sp.)

被引:45
|
作者
Rossi, S. [1 ]
Pol, F. [2 ]
Forot, B. [1 ]
Masse-provin, N. [3 ]
Rigaux, S. [4 ]
Bronner, A. [5 ]
Le Potier, M. -F. [2 ]
机构
[1] Game & Wildlife Agcy, Off Natl Chasse & Faune Sauvage, Unite Sanit Faune, Wildlife Sanit Unit, F-05000 Gap, France
[2] Natl Reference Lab Swine Fever Zoopole Les Croix, Unite Virol Immunol Porcines, LERAPP, AFSSA, F-22440 Ploufragan, France
[3] Direct Serv Vet Reg Task Force CSF, F-67200 Strasbourg, France
[4] Direct Serv Vet, F-57078 Metz, France
[5] Minist Agr, Direct Gen Alimentat, F-75000 Paris, France
关键词
Wild boar; Classical swine fever; Preventive vaccination; C-STRAIN VACCINE; RT-PCR ASSAY; ORAL IMMUNIZATION; POPULATIONS; PERSISTENCE; DIAGNOSIS; GERMANY; VIRUS; TRANSMISSION; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.09.050
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Over the last 20 years, oral vaccination implementing a live attenuated vaccine has been experimented in Europe in order to control classical swine fever (CSF) in Wild Boar (Sus scrofa sp.). This has generally led to an enhanced seroprevalence and a decreased viroprevalence at the scale of the whole vaccinated populations, but no quantitative analysis has demonstrated the protective effect of preventive vaccination or intensive baiting. In the present paper we conducted a retrospective analysis at the scale of the municipality, taking into account the local dynamics and possible covariates of infection to test the effect of preventive vaccination and of the baiting effort. To be efficient, vaccination was expected to increase seroprevalence above the level considered as suitable for preventing disease invasion (40-60%) independently of infection, to protect free areas from disease invasion or contribute to control subsequent disease intensity and duration. We also hypothesized that a better baiting effort would be correlated with an improvement of immunisation and disease control. In uninfected municipalities, seroprevalence increased up to 40% after 1 year, i.e., three vaccination campaigns. We observed a significant protective effect of preventive vaccination, especially within municipalities that had been vaccinated at least 1 year before disease emergence and where virus detection did not last more than one quarter. On the other hand, we did not detect a significant effect of the baiting effort on local seroprevalence or disease dynamics, suggesting that the baiting system could be improved. We discuss these results regarding the improvement of management measures and further research perspective. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 107
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Changes in the Genetic Structure of Lithuania's Wild Boar (Sus scrofa) Population Following the Outbreak of African Swine Fever
    Griciuviene, Loreta
    Janeliunas, Zygimantas
    Pileviciene, Simona
    Jurgelevicius, Vaclovas
    Paulauskas, Algimantas
    GENES, 2022, 13 (09)
  • [22] Novel rope-based sampling of classical swine fever shedding in a group of wild boar showing low contagiosity upon experimental infection with a classical swine fever field strain of genotype 2.3
    Mouchantat, Susan
    Globig, Anja
    Boehle, Wolfgang
    Petrov, Anja
    Strebelow, Heinz-Guenther
    Mettenleiter, Thomas C.
    Depner, Klaus
    VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 2014, 170 (3-4) : 425 - 429
  • [23] Trapping as an alternative method of eradicating classical swine fever in a wild boar population in Bulgaria
    Alexandrov, T.
    Kamenov, P.
    Stefanov, D.
    Depner, K.
    REVUE SCIENTIFIQUE ET TECHNIQUE-OFFICE INTERNATIONAL DES EPIZOOTIES, 2011, 30 (03): : 911 - 916
  • [24] Development of maternal antibodies after oral vaccination of young female wild boar against classical swine fever
    Kaden, V
    Lange, E
    VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 2004, 103 (1-2) : 115 - 119
  • [25] Surveillance of classical swine fever in wild boar in South Korea from 2010-2014
    Kim, Yong Kwan
    Lim, Seong-In
    Kim, Jae-Jo
    Cho, Yoon-Young
    Song, Jae-Young
    Cho, In-Soo
    Hyun, Bang-Hun
    Choi, Sung-Hyun
    Kim, Seung-Hoe
    Park, Eun-Hye
    An, Dong-Jun
    JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2015, 77 (12) : 1667 - 1671
  • [26] Diagnostic procedures after completion of oral immunisation against classical swine fever in wild boar
    Kaden, V.
    Kramer, M.
    Kern, B.
    Hlinak, A.
    Mewes, L.
    Haenel, A.
    Renner, Ch.
    Dedek, J.
    Bruer, W.
    REVUE SCIENTIFIQUE ET TECHNIQUE-OFFICE INTERNATIONAL DES EPIZOOTIES, 2006, 25 (03): : 989 - 997
  • [27] Detection of antibodies against classical swine fever virus in fecal samples from wild boar
    Seo, Sang Won
    Sunwoo, Sun Young
    Hyun, Bang Hoon
    Lyoo, Young S.
    VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 2012, 161 (1-2) : 218 - 221
  • [28] Landscape elements affecting the ingestion of oral vaccine against classical swine fever in wild boar
    Endo, Tomohiko
    Hirata, Shigeki
    Hayama, Yoko
    Kodera, Yuuji
    Takeuchi, Masahiko
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE RESEARCH, 2023, 69 (05)
  • [29] Does multiple oral vaccination of wild boar against classical swine fever (CSF) have a positive influence on the immunity?
    Kaden, V
    Lange, E
    Steyer, H
    Kaden, V
    Lange, E
    Steyer, H
    DEUTSCHE TIERARZTLICHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2004, 111 (02): : 63 - 67
  • [30] Classical Swine Fever in wild boar in Rhineland-Palatinate: evaluation of the official control measures from 2005-2011
    Roemelt, Maria
    Klingelhoefer, Irene
    Koenig, Astrid
    Braun, Bettina
    Zimmer, Karl
    Reiner, Gerald
    BERLINER UND MUNCHENER TIERARZTLICHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2015, 128 (11-12): : 507 - 516