A sensitivity analysis and a comparison of two simulators performance for the process of natural gas sweetening

被引:34
作者
Pablo Gutierrez, Juan [1 ]
Benitez, Leonel A. [1 ]
Ruiz, Elisa L. Ale [2 ]
Erdmann, Eleonora [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Salta UNSa, Consejo Invest CIUNSa, Inst Invest Ind Quim, UNSa CONICET, Ave Bolivia 5150, RA-4400 Salta, Argentina
[2] Univ Nacl Salta UNSa, Consejo Invest CIUNSa, Fac Ingn, Ave Bolivia 5150, RA-4400 Salta, Argentina
[3] Inst Tecnol Buenos Aires ITBA, Ave Eduardo Madero 399, RA-1106 Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
关键词
Sweetening; Simulation; Amines; Natural gas; Optimization; CO2; ABSORPTION; ASPEN HYSYS; MODEL; OPTIMIZATION; PLANT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jngse.2016.04.015
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Chemical processes simulation is an important instrument for the design, optimization and control of industrial plants. Simulation cases can be accomplished with relatively low costs and the absence of risks for the operators. However, the precision of the results depends on the similarity between the simulation performed and the process considered. In this article, two simulators, Aspen Hysys V8.6 and Aspen Plus V8.6, are employed to simulate the process of natural gas sweetening using diethanolamine (DEA). Additionally, a parametric sensitivity analysis is performed to define the optimal operative range for the process. The required data and the conditions of the operating units are taken from a gas conditioning plant in northern Argentina. Finally, a comparison between the block of obtained results from both simulations is also detailed. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:800 / 807
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Performance study on a single-screw compressor for a portable natural gas liquefaction process
    Li, Yong
    Xie, Gongnan
    Sunden, Bengt
    Lu, Yuanwei
    Wu, Yuting
    Qin, Jiang
    ENERGY, 2018, 148 : 1032 - 1045
  • [42] Natural gas sweetening process simulation and optimization: A case study of Khurmala field in Iraqi Kurdistan region
    Abdulrahman, R. K.
    Sebastine, I. M.
    JOURNAL OF NATURAL GAS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2013, 14 : 116 - 120
  • [43] Performance analysis of an internal combustion engine operated on producer gas, in comparison with the performance of the natural gas and diesel engines
    Raman, P.
    Ram, N. K.
    ENERGY, 2013, 63 : 317 - 333
  • [44] Performance analysis of VPSA process for separating N2O from adipic acid tail gas
    Wu, Tongbo
    Niu, Zhaoyang
    Feng, Li
    Yu, Xiuxin
    Liu, Bing
    Zhang, Donghui
    SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 256
  • [45] Sensitivity analysis of effects of design parameters and decision variables on optimization of natural gas liquefaction process
    Tak, Kyungjae
    Choi, Jiwon
    Ryu, Jun-Hyung
    Moon, Il
    ENERGY, 2020, 206
  • [46] Thermodynamic performance analysis of a solar-assisted distributed system driven by natural gas
    Li, Meng
    Wang, Jiangjiang
    INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS FOR ENERGY TRANSITIONS, 2019, 158 : 210 - 216
  • [47] Investigating the effect of absorbent material and heat flux in natural gas sweetening process using molecular dynamics simulation
    Samani, Mohammad Hossein Babakhani
    Toghraie, Davood
    Mehmandoust, Babak
    Niknejadi, Mohammadreza
    Fazilati, Mohammad Ali
    CASE STUDIES IN THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2024, 61
  • [48] Performance of a Two-stages Gas Gun: Experimental, Analytical and Numerical Analysis
    Majzoobi, G. H.
    Rahmati, M. H. Ghaed
    Kashfi, M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING, 2019, 32 (05): : 759 - 768
  • [49] Methanol production from natural gas reforming and CO2 capturing process, simulation, design, and technical-economic analysis
    Ren, Bo-Ping
    Xu, Yi-Peng
    Huang, Yu-Wei
    She, Chen
    Sun, Bo
    ENERGY, 2023, 263
  • [50] Process simulation, parametric sensitivity analysis and ANFIS modeling of CO2 capture from natural gas using aqueous MDEA-PZ blend solution
    Nwaoha, Chikezie
    Odoh, Kenneth
    Ikpatt, Emmanuel
    Orji, Rita
    Idem, Raphael
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 5 (06): : 5588 - 5598