The Use and Abuse of Normative Ethics for Moral Machines

被引:0
作者
Stenseke, Jakob [1 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Dept Philosophy, Lund, Sweden
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF ROBOPHILOSOPHY - SOCIAL ROBOTS IN SOCIAL INSTITUTIONS | 2022年 / 366卷
关键词
machine ethics; moral machines; artificial moral agents; normative ethics; artificial intelligence (AI) ethics; consequentialism; deontology; virtue ethics; DECISION-MAKING; CONSCIOUSNESS; AUTONOMY; REASONS; AGENCY;
D O I
10.3233/FAIA220614
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
How do we develop artificial intelligence (AI) systems that adhere to the norms and values of our human practices? Is it a promising idea to develop systems based on the principles of normative frameworks such as consequentialism, deontology, or virtue ethics? According to many researchers in machine ethics - a subfield exploring the prospects of constructing moral machines - the answer is yes. In this paper, I challenge this methodological strategy by exploring the difference between normative ethics - its use and abuse in human practices and in the context of machines. First, I discuss the purpose of normative theory in human contexts; its main strengths and drawbacks. I then describe several moral resources central to the success of normative ethics in human practices. I argue that machines, currently and in the foreseeable future, lack the resources needed to justify the very use of normative theory. Instead, I propose that machine ethicists should pay closer attention to the multifaceted ways normativity serves and functions in human practices, and how artificial systems can be designed and deployed to foster the moral resources that allow such practices to prosper.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 164
页数:10
相关论文
共 72 条
[11]  
BALES RE, 1971, AM PHILOS QUART, V8, P257
[12]  
Bauman Z., 1993, POSTMODERN ETHICS
[13]  
Beauchamp TL., 2001, PRINCIPLES BIOMEDICA
[14]   A Normative Approach to Artificial Moral Agency [J].
Behdadi, Dorna ;
Munthe, Christian .
MINDS AND MACHINES, 2020, 30 (02) :195-218
[15]   The Limits and Prospects of Business Ethics [J].
Brenkert, George G. .
BUSINESS ETHICS QUARTERLY, 2010, 20 (04) :703-709
[16]   Can artificial intelligences be moral agents? [J].
Brozek, Bartosz ;
Janik, Bartosz .
NEW IDEAS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 54 :101-106
[17]  
Capraro V, 2018, JUDGM DECIS MAK, V13, P99
[18]   Artificial Moral Agents: A Survey of the Current Status [J].
Cervantes, Jose-Antonio ;
Lopez, Sonia ;
Rodriguez, Luis-Felipe ;
Cervantes, Salvador ;
Cervantes, Francisco ;
Ramos, Felix .
SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, 2020, 26 (02) :501-532
[19]  
Cloos C, 2005, 2005 AAAI FALL S MAC
[20]   Robot rights? Towards a social-relational justification of moral consideration [J].
Coeckelbergh, Mark .
ETHICS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 12 (03) :209-221