On Setting the First Dose in Man: Quantitating Biotherapeutic Drug-Target Binding through Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Models

被引:50
作者
Lowe, Philip J. [1 ]
Tannenbaum, Stacey [2 ]
Wu, Kai [3 ]
Lloyd, Peter [4 ]
Sims, Jennifer [4 ]
机构
[1] Novartis Pharma AG, Modelling & Simulat, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland
[2] Novartis Pharmaceut, Modelling & Simulat, E Hanover, NJ USA
[3] Novartis Inst Biomed Res, Modelling & Simulat, Cambridge, MA USA
[4] Novartis Pharma AG, Novartis Biol Unit, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland
关键词
ANTIBODY; OMALIZUMAB; ASTHMA; IGE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1742-7843.2009.00513.x
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Although the three (perhaps four) phases of clinical drug development are well known, it is relatively unappreciated that there are similar phases in pre-clinical development. These consist of 'Phase I' the initial, normally Research Discovery driven pharmacology; 'Phase II' non-good laboratory practice (GLP) dose range finding, followed by pivotal 'Phase III' GLP toxicology. Together with an array of in vitro experiments comparing species, these stages should enable an integrated safety assessment prior to entry into man, documenting to investigators and authorities evidence that the new pharmaceutic is unlikely to cause harm. Following the lessons learned from TeGenero TGN1412 and subsequent updates to regulatory guidelines, there are aspects peculiar to biotherapeutics, especially those that target key body systems, where calculations could be made for doses for human studies using pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic models. Two of these are exemplified in this paper. In the first, target-mediated drug disposition, where the binding of the drug to a cellular target quantitatively affects the pharmacokinetics, enables occupancy to be estimated without recourse to independent assays. In the second, assaying captured soluble target, as drug-target complexes, allows estimation of the concentration of the free ligand ensuring that in initial clinical studies, soluble targets are not overly suppressed. To support this methodology, it has been demonstrated using omalizumab, free and total IgE data that such analyses do predict the suppression of the free unbound ligand with reasonable accuracy. Overall, the objective of the process is to deliver a justification, through consideration of drug-target binding, of a safe starting and therapeutically relevant escalation doses for human studies.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 209
页数:15
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Use of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling for starting dose selection in first-in-human trials of high-risk biologics
    Agoram, Balaji M.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2009, 67 (02) : 153 - 160
  • [2] Constable G., 2006, CSP159C FINAL REPORT
  • [3] *EUR MED AG, 2007, EUR MED AG GUID STRA
  • [4] *FOOD DRUG ADM, 2005, CTR RES GUID EST MAX
  • [5] Target-mediated drug disposition model: relationships with indirect response models and application to population PK-PD analysis
    Gibiansky, Leonid
    Gibiansky, Ekaterina
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS, 2009, 36 (04) : 341 - 351
  • [6] Approximations of the target-mediated drug disposition model and identifiability of model parameters
    Gibiansky, Leonid
    Gibiansky, Ekaterina
    Kakkar, Tarundeep
    Ma, Peiming
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS, 2008, 35 (05) : 573 - 591
  • [7] Gaining insights into the consequences of target-mediated drug disposition of monoclonal antibodies using quasi-steady-state approximations
    Grimm, Hans Peter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS, 2009, 36 (05) : 407 - 420
  • [8] A mechanism-based binding model for the population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of omalizumab
    Hayashi, Naoto
    Tsukamoto, Yuko
    Sallas, William M.
    Lowe, Philip J.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2007, 63 (05) : 548 - 561
  • [9] Benefits of omalizumab as add-on therapy in patients with severe persistent asthma who are inadequately controlled despite best available therapy (GINA 2002 step 4 treatment):: INNOVATE
    Humbert, M
    Beasley, R
    Ayres, J
    Slavin, R
    Hébert, J
    Bousquet, J
    Beeh, KM
    Ramos, S
    Canonica, GW
    Hedgecock, S
    Fox, H
    Blogg, M
    Surrey, K
    [J]. ALLERGY, 2005, 60 (03) : 309 - 316
  • [10] In vivo regulation of interleukin 1β in patients with cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes
    Lachmann, Helen J.
    Lowe, Philip
    Felix, Sandra Daniela
    Rordorf, Christiane
    Leslie, Kieron
    Madhoo, Sheril
    Wittkowski, Helmut
    Bek, Stephan
    Hartmann, Nicole
    Bosset, Sophie
    Hawkins, Philip N.
    Jung, Thomas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2009, 206 (05) : 1029 - 1036