On Strategic Interactions in Blockchain Markets: A Three-stage Stackelberg Game Approach

被引:0
|
作者
Shao, Jianbo [1 ]
Xu, Yang [2 ]
Liu, Jia [2 ,3 ]
Takakura, Hiroki [3 ]
Li, Zhao [4 ]
Dong, Xuewen [2 ]
机构
[1] Xidian Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Xian, Peoples R China
[2] Xidian Univ, Sch Comp Sci & Technol, Xian, Peoples R China
[3] Natl Inst Informat, Ctr Cybersecur Res & Dev, Tokyo, Japan
[4] Xidian Univ, Sch Cyber Engn, Xian, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Blockchain market; strategic interactions; Stackelberg game; equilibrium; PoW competition; POWER;
D O I
10.1109/GLOBECOM46510.2021.9685981
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Blockchain technology is a promising approach for solving the security and personal privacy problems in Internet applications. The successful commercial deployment of Blockchain markets relies on a comprehensive understanding of the economic and strategic interactions among different entities involved. In this paper, we focus on a blockchain market consisting of a blockchain platform (BP), multiple miners, and blockchain users (BUs), and formulate their interactions as a three-stage Stackelberg game. In Stage I, the BP strategizes the rewards granted to the miners, so as to attract the miners to contribute more computing power used for improving the security and privacy of the blockchain. In Stage II, each miner strategizes its computing power individually for winning the mining competition, which is modeled as a non-cooperative game. In Stage III, the BUs strategize the transaction fee to acquire a corresponding service experience. With the objective of utility maximization, we develop a theoretical framework to analyze the hierarchical interactive behaviors among the entities in a backward inductive way. By solving the Stackelberg equilibrium, we determine the optimal strategies of entities in closed-form. Numerical results are provided to demonstrate the performance of the strategic interactions in the blockchain market.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Three-stage approach to ultrasound contrast detection
    Kirkhorn, J
    Frinking, PJA
    de Jong, N
    Torp, H
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ULTRASONICS FERROELECTRICS AND FREQUENCY CONTROL, 2001, 48 (04) : 1013 - 1022
  • [22] Three-stage approach of hybridoma media optimization
    Peppers, SC
    Talley, DL
    Johnson, TK
    Caple, MV
    MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF THE CELL, 2000, 11 : 64A - 64A
  • [23] A Three-Stage Approach for Grid Task Scheduling
    Panda, Sanjaya Kumar
    Khilar, Pabitra Mohan
    2012 2ND IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PARALLEL, DISTRIBUTED AND GRID COMPUTING (PDGC), 2012, : 441 - 446
  • [24] Blockchain-Assisted Secure Energy Trading in Electricity Markets: A Tiny Deep Reinforcement Learning-Based Stackelberg Game Approach
    Xiao, Yong
    Lin, Xiaoming
    Lei, Yiyong
    Gu, Yanzhang
    Tang, Jianlin
    Zhang, Fan
    Qian, Bin
    ELECTRONICS, 2024, 13 (18)
  • [25] Strategic level three-stage production distribution planning with capacity expansion
    Yilmaz, Pinar
    Catay, Bulent
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2006, 51 (04) : 609 - 620
  • [26] Three-stage auction scheme for computation offloading on mobile blockchain with edge computing
    Xia, Chengpeng
    Wu, Yalan
    Chen, Long
    Chen, Yawen
    Wu, Jigang
    CONCURRENCY AND COMPUTATION-PRACTICE & EXPERIENCE, 2022, 34 (25):
  • [27] A Three-Stage Game Model of the Supply Chain in Disaster Relief Operations
    Mauro Passacantando
    Fabio Raciti
    Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 2025, 205 (3)
  • [28] Web agents with a three-stage information filtering approach
    Sim, KM
    2003 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CYBERWORLDS, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 266 - 273
  • [29] A three-stage approach to measuring health inequalities and inequities
    Yukiko Asada
    Jeremiah Hurley
    Ole Frithjof Norheim
    Mira Johri
    International Journal for Equity in Health, 13
  • [30] A three-stage hybrid approach for weight assignment in MADM
    Yang, Guo-liang
    Yang, Jian-Bo
    Xu, Dong-Ling
    Khoveyni, Mohammad
    OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2017, 71 : 93 - 105