Toward the KRW Composition Conjecture: Cubic Formula Lower Bounds via Communication Complexity

被引:10
作者
Dinur, Irit [1 ]
Meir, Or [2 ]
机构
[1] Weizmann Inst Sci, Fac Comp Sci & Math, Rehovot, Israel
[2] Univ Haifa, Dept Comp Sci, Haifa, Israel
来源
31ST CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY (CCC 2016) | 2016年 / 50卷
关键词
Formula lower bounds; communication complexity; Karchmer-Wigderson games; KRW composition conjecture; MONOTONE CIRCUITS; MORGAN FORMULAS; SHRINKAGE;
D O I
10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2016.3
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
One of the major challenges of the research in circuit complexity is proving super-polynomial lower bounds for de-Morgan formulas. Karchmer, Raz, and Wigderson [20] suggested to approach this problem by proving that formula complexity behaves "as expected" with respect to the composition of functions f (sic) g. They showed that this conjecture, if proved, would imply super-polynomial formula lower bounds. The first step toward proving the KRW conjecture was made by Edmonds et al. [10], who proved an analogue of the conjecture for the composition of "universal relations". In this work, we extend the argument of [10] further to f (sic) g where f is an arbitrary function and g is the parity function. While this special case of the KRW conjecture was already proved implicitly in Hastad's work on random restrictions [14], our proof seems more likely to be generalizable to other cases of the conjecture. In particular, our proof uses an entirely different approach, based on communication complexity technique of Karchmer and Wigderson [21]. In addition, our proof gives a new structural result, which roughly says that the naive way for computing f (sic) g is the only optimal way. Along the way, we obtain a new proof of the state-of-the-art formula lower bound of n(3-o(1)) due to [14].
引用
收藏
页数:51
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Andreev Alexander E., 1987, Moscow University Mathematics Bulletin, V42, P24
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Communication complexity
[3]  
Barak B, 2010, ACM S THEORY COMPUT, P67
[4]   Choosing, Agreeing, and Eliminating in Communication Complexity [J].
Beimel, Amos ;
Ben Daniel, Sebastian ;
Kushilevitz, Eyal ;
Weinreb, Enav .
COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY, 2014, 23 (01) :1-42
[5]   SIZE-DEPTH TRADEOFFS FOR BOOLEAN-FORMULAS [J].
BONET, ML ;
BUSS, SR .
INFORMATION PROCESSING LETTERS, 1994, 49 (03) :151-155
[6]  
Braverman M, 2012, STOC'12: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2012 ACM SYMPOSIUM ON THEORY OF COMPUTING, P505
[7]   Information Equals Amortized Communication [J].
Braverman, Mark ;
Rao, Anup .
2011 IEEE 52ND ANNUAL SYMPOSIUM ON FOUNDATIONS OF COMPUTER SCIENCE (FOCS 2011), 2011, :748-757
[8]   PARALLEL EVALUATION OF GENERAL ARITHMETIC EXPRESSIONS [J].
BRENT, RP .
JOURNAL OF THE ACM, 1974, 21 (02) :201-206
[9]   Mining Circuit Lower Bound Proofs for Meta-Algorithms [J].
Chen, Ruiwen ;
Kabanets, Valentine ;
Kolokolova, Antonina ;
Shaltiel, Ronen ;
Zuckerman, David .
COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY, 2015, 24 (02) :333-392
[10]  
Cover TM., 1991, ELEMENTS INFORM THEO, V1, P279