Medical intensive care unit clinician attitudes and perceived barriers towards early mobilization of critically ill patients: a cross-sectional survey study

被引:84
|
作者
Jolley, Sarah E. [1 ,4 ]
Regan-Baggs, Janet [2 ]
Dickson, Robert P. [3 ]
Hough, Catherine L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Div Pulm & Crit Care Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Nursing, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Div Pulm & Crit Care Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] Univ Washington, Harborview Med Ctr, Div Pulm & Crit Care Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
来源
BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY | 2014年 / 14卷
关键词
Early mobilization; ICU acquired weakness; ICU mobility; ACUTE RESPIRATORY-FAILURE; PROLONGED MECHANICAL VENTILATION; RESOURCE UTILIZATION; PROSPECTIVE COHORT; EARLY MOBILITY; ICU; THERAPY; OUTCOMES; REHABILITATION; IMPLEMENTATION;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2253-14-84
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Early mobilization (EM) of patients on mechanical ventilation (MV) is shown to improve outcomes after critical illness. Little is known regarding clinician knowledge of EM or multi-disciplinary barriers to use of EM in the intensive care unit (ICU). The goal of this study was to assess clinician knowledge regarding EM and identify barriers to its provision. Methods: Simultaneous cross-sectional surveys of medical ICU (MICU) nurses (RN)/physical therapists (PT) respondents and physician (MD) respondents in a single MICU at an academic hospital in Seattle, WA in 2010-2011. Responses were indicated on a 5 point Likert scale and reported as proportion of respondents agreeing or disagreeing. Chi-square testing and Fisher's exact testing was performed to determine whether responses differed by duration of employment or prior EM experience. Results: A total of 120 clinicians responded to the survey (91 MDs (response rate 82% (91/111)), 17 RNs (response rate 22%, (17/78)), and 12 PTs (response rate 86%, (12/14)), overall response rate 86%). Most clinicians indicated knowledge regarding benefits of EM. More attending physicians reported knowledge of EM benefits, but also that risks of EM outweigh the benefits compared to trainees (p = 0.02 and 0.01). Clinicians across disciplines reported near universal agreement to use of EM for patients on MV, while the minority reported agreement to EM for patients on vasoactive agents. The most frequently reported cross-disciplinary barriers to EM were staffing and time. Risk of self-injury and excess work stress were indicated as barriers by RN and PT respondents. Conclusions: MICU clinicians, at our institution, reported knowledge of EM in the ICU. Staffing and clinician time were frequently identified cross-disciplinary barriers. Risk of self-injury and excess work stress were frequently reported RN and PT barriers.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Medical intensive care unit clinician attitudes and perceived barriers towards early mobilization of critically ill patients: a cross-sectional survey study
    Sarah E Jolley
    Janet Regan-Baggs
    Robert P Dickson
    Catherine L Hough
    BMC Anesthesiology, 14
  • [2] Intensive care unit nurses' knowledge, attitudes, and perceived barriers regarding early mobilization of patients
    Wang, Jiani
    Xiao, Qian
    Zhang, Chunyan
    Jia, Yanrui
    Shi, Chenxi
    NURSING IN CRITICAL CARE, 2020, 25 (06) : 339 - 345
  • [3] Knowledge, Attitudes, and Perceived Barriers of Healthcare Providers toward Early Mobilization of Adult Critically Ill Patients in Intensive Care Unit
    Akhtar, Pooja M.
    Deshmukh, Priyanka K.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2021, 25 (05) : 512 - 518
  • [4] Interprofessional Survey of Perceived Barriers and Facilitators to Early Mobilization of Critically Ill Patients in Montreal, Canada
    Anekwe, David E.
    Koo, Karen Kin-Yue
    de Marchie, Michel
    Goldberg, Peter
    Jayaraman, Dev
    Spahija, Jadranka
    JOURNAL OF INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2019, 34 (03) : 218 - 226
  • [5] Quest of Knowledge and Perceived Barriers Toward Early Mobilization of Critically Ill Patients in Intensive Care Unit: A Continuing Journey!
    Daptardar, Anuradha A.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2021, 25 (05) : 489 - 490
  • [6] The relationship between person-centred care and the intensive care unit experience of critically ill patients: A multicentre cross-sectional survey
    Kang, Jiyeon
    Lee, Minju
    Cho, Young Shin
    Jeong, Jin-Heon
    Choi, Sol A.
    Hong, Jiwon
    AUSTRALIAN CRITICAL CARE, 2022, 35 (06) : 623 - 629
  • [7] Prioritizing information topics for relatives of critically ill patients: Cross-sectional survey among intensive care unit relatives and professionals
    Hoffmann, Magdalena
    Holl, Anna K.
    Burgsteiner, Harald
    Eller, Philipp
    Pieber, Thomas R.
    Amrein, Karin
    WIENER KLINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2018, 130 (21-22) : 645 - 652
  • [8] mobilization in critically ill burn patients: A survey Facilitators & barriers and practices of early
    Dikkema, Y.
    Mouton, L. J.
    Cleffken, B.
    de Jong, E.
    van Baar, M. E.
    Pijpe, A.
    Niemeijer, A. S.
    van der Schans, C. P.
    Scholten, S. M. J. H.
    van der Steen-Dieperink, M.
    Nieuwenhuis, M. K.
    BURNS, 2023, 49 (01) : 42 - 54
  • [9] Effects of Mobilization among Critically Ill Patients in the Intensive Care Unit: A Single-center Retrospective Study
    Watanabe, Shinichi
    Liu, Keibun
    Morita, Yasunari
    Kanaya, Takahiro
    Naito, Yuji
    Suzuki, Shuichi
    Hasegawa, Yoshinori
    PROGRESS IN REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2022, 7
  • [10] INTERPROFESSIONAL AND CAREGIVER SURVEY OF PERCEIVED BARRIERS TO EARLY MOBILIZATION IN THE PEDIATRIC INTENSIVE CARE UNIT
    Noordin, A. A.
    Yang, L.
    Sidhu, P. K.
    Qadri, S. K.
    Lim, J.
    PEDIATRIC CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2022, 23 (11)