共 50 条
A three-arm randomized controlled trial of Lidcombe Program and Westmead Program early stuttering interventions
被引:21
|作者:
Trajkovski, Natasha
[1
,5
]
O'Brian, Sue
[1
,5
]
Onslow, Mark
[1
,5
]
Packman, Ann
[1
,5
]
Lowe, Robyn
[1
,5
]
Menzies, Ross
[1
,5
]
Jones, Mark
[2
,6
]
Reilly, Sheena
[3
,4
]
机构:
[1] Univ Sydney, Fac Hlth Sci, Australian Stuttering Res Ctr, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Sch Publ Hlth, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Griffith Univ, Menzies Hlth Inst Queensland, Nathan, Qld, Australia
[4] Murdoch Children Res Inst, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[5] Univ Technol Sydney, Australian Stuttering Res Ctr, Bldg 1,15 Broadway, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia
[6] Bond Univ, Biostat, Gold Coast, Australia
基金:
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词:
Stuttering;
Pre-school;
Treatment;
SYLLABLE-TIMED SPEECH;
PHASE-II TRIAL;
CHILDREN;
D O I:
10.1016/j.jfludis.2019.105708
中图分类号:
R36 [病理学];
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号:
100104 ;
100213 ;
摘要:
PURPOSE<bold>: </bold>To compare two experimental Westmead Program treatments with a control Lidcombe Program treatment for early stuttering. <bold> </bold>METHOD: The design was a three-arm randomized controlled trial with blinded outcome assessments 9 months post-randomization. Participants were 91 pre-school children. <bold> </bold>RESULTS: There was no evidence of difference in percentage syllables stuttered at 9 months among groups. Dropout rates were substantive and may have been connected with novel aspects of the trial design: the use of community clinicians, no exclusion criteria, and randomization of children younger than 3 years of age. <bold> </bold>CONCLUSION: The substantive dropout rate for all three arms in this trial means that any conclusions about the 9-month stuttering outcomes must be regarded as tentative. However, continued development of the Westmead Program is warranted, and we are currently constructing an internet version.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文