Factors affecting distant disease-free survival for primary invasive breast cancer: Use of a log-normal survival model

被引:45
作者
McCready, DR
Chapman, JAW
Hanna, WM
Kahn, HJ
Murray, D
Fish, EB
Trudeau, ME
Andrulis, IL
Lickley, HLA
机构
[1] Princess Margaret Hosp, Dept Surg Oncol, Toronto, ON M5G 2L7, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Sunnybrook & Womens Coll Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Pathol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Sunnybrook & Womens Coll Hlth Sci Ctr, Henrietta Banting Breast Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, St Michaels Hosp, Dept Pathol, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada
[5] Univ Toronto, Mt Sinai Hosp, Samuel Lunenfeld Res Inst, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada
关键词
breast cancer; disease-free survival; prognostic factors;
D O I
10.1007/s10434-000-0416-z
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Invasive breast cancer is a frequently diagnosed disease that now comes with an ever expanding array of therapeutic management options. We assessed the effects of 20 prognostic factors in a multivariate context. Methods: We accrued clinical data for 156 consecutive patients with stage 1-3 primary invasive breast cancer who were diagnosed in 1989-1990 at the Henrietta Banting Breast Center, and followed to 1995. There is complete follow-up for 91% of patients (median fellow-up of 4.9 years). The event of interest was distant recurrence (for distant disease-free survival. DFS). We used Cox and log-normal step-wise regression to assess the multivariate effects of the following factors on DFS: age, tumor size, nodal status, histology, tumor and nuclear grade, lymphovascular and perineural invasion (LVPI), ductal carcinoma-in-situ (DCIS) type, DCIS extent, DCIS at edge of tumor, ER and PgR, ERICA, adjuvant systemic therapy, ki67, S-phase, DNA index, neu oncogene, and pRb. Results: There was strong evidence against the Cox assumption of proportional hazards for nodal status, and nodal status was not in the Cox step-wise model. With step-wise log-normal regression, a large tumor size (P < .001), positive nodes (P = .002), high nuclear grade (P = .01), presence of LVPI (P = .03), and infiltrating duct carcinoma not otherwise specified (P = .05) were associated with a reduction in DFS. Conclusions: For nodal status, there was strong evidence against the Cox assumption of proportional hazards, and it was not included in the Cox model although it was in the log-normal model. Only traditional factors were included in the step-wise models. Thus, this statistical management of prognostic markers in breast cancer appears to be very important.
引用
收藏
页码:416 / 426
页数:11
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Allred DC, 1998, MODERN PATHOL, V11, P155
[2]   DANGERS OF USING OPTIMAL CUTPOINTS IN THE EVALUATION OF PROGNOSTIC FACTORS [J].
ALTMAN, DG ;
LAUSEN, B ;
SAUERBREI, W ;
SCHUMACHER, M .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1994, 86 (11) :829-835
[3]   neu/erbB-2 amplification identifies a poor-prognosis group of women with node-negative breast cancer [J].
Andrulis, IL ;
Bull, SB ;
Blackstein, ME ;
Sutherland, D ;
Mak, C ;
Sidlofsky, S ;
Pritzker, KPH ;
Hartwick, RW ;
Hanna, W ;
Lickley, L ;
Wilkinson, R ;
Qizilbash, A ;
Ambus, U ;
Lipa, M ;
Weizel, H ;
Katz, A ;
Baida, M ;
Mariz, S ;
Stoik, G ;
Dacamara, P ;
Strongitharm, D ;
Geddie, W ;
McCready, D .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1998, 16 (04) :1340-1349
[5]  
BOAG JW, 1949, J ROY STAT SOC B, V11, P15
[6]  
Chapman JAW, 1998, CYTOMETRY, V31, P67, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0320(19980101)31:1<67::AID-CYTO9>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-G
[8]   A COMPARISON OF ALL-SUBSET COX AND ACCELERATED FAILURE TIME MODELS WITH COX STEP-WISE REGRESSION FOR NODE-POSITIVE BREAST-CANCER [J].
CHAPMAN, JAW ;
TRUDEAU, ME ;
PRITCHARD, KI ;
SAWKA, CA ;
MOBBS, BG ;
HANNA, WM ;
KAHN, H ;
MCCREADY, DR ;
LICKLEY, LA .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 1992, 22 (03) :263-272
[9]   Alternative multivariate modelling for time to local recurrence for breast cancer patients receiving a lumpectomy alone [J].
Chapman, JW ;
Hanna, W ;
Kahn, HJ ;
Lickley, HLA ;
Wall, J ;
Fish, EB ;
McCready, DR .
SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-OXFORD, 1996, 5 (5-6) :265-271
[10]   An improved statistical approach: Can it clarify the role of new prognostic factors for breast cancer? [J].
Chapman, JW ;
Murray, D ;
McCready, DR ;
Hanna, W ;
Kahn, HJ ;
Lickley, HLA ;
Trudeau, ME ;
Mobbs, BG ;
Sawka, CA ;
Fish, EB ;
Pritchard, KI .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1996, 32A (11) :1949-1956