Protection motivation theory and pro-environmental behaviour: A systematic mapping review

被引:146
作者
Kothe, Emily J. [1 ]
Ling, Mathew [1 ]
North, Madelon [1 ]
Klas, Anna [1 ]
Mullan, Barbara A. [2 ]
Novoradovskaya, Lisa [2 ]
机构
[1] Deakin Univ, Sch Psychol, Misinformat Lab, Geelong, Vic, Australia
[2] Curtin Univ, Sch Psychol, Hlth Psychol & Behav Med Res Grp, Perth, WA, Australia
关键词
conservation psychology; environmental psychology; pro-environmental behaviour; protection motivation theory; systematic mapping review; CLIMATE-CHANGE; FEAR APPEALS; SUSTAINABILITY; INTENTIONS; CONSERVATION; METAANALYSIS; PREDICTORS; APPRAISALS; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOLOGY;
D O I
10.1111/ajpy.12271
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Objective Climate change and related issues associated with the interaction of humans with the environment are of great importance in today's context. More and more research is focusing on understanding what can be done to prevent and reverse the effects of environmental problems through individual behaviours. Within psychology, there is a lack of synthesis of what drives pro-environmental behaviours in various paradigms and how they can be changed. The current study focuses on the application of protection motivation theory to predicting and changing pro-environmental behaviours using a systematic mapping approach. Methods A systematic screening of 132 databases was performed, resulting in the identification of 22 relevant studies with the total N = 12,827. Results Investigation of the included research revealed a number of gaps in knowledge including: lack of experimental evidence with successful manipulations of protection motivation theory constructs; non-inclusion of all the aspects of the theory into studies; the absence of examination of the intention-behaviour relationship; the lack of consistency in operationalisation of protection motivation theory constructs; a focus on predominantly western high income societies, and the lack of uniformity in the definition of pro-environmental behaviours. Conclusion Future research should consider employing experimental designs with proper manipulation checks and longitudinal focus, as well as consistent definitions and operationalisations of relevant concepts, and exploring these constructs across different countries.
引用
收藏
页码:411 / 432
页数:22
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]  
Ahern L., 2008, PSYCHOL RESPONSES EN
[2]  
Almarshad SO, 2017, EUR J SUSTAIN DEV, V6, P89, DOI 10.14207/ejsd.2017.v6n2p89
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Voluntas, DOI DOI 10.1007/S11266-007-9050-8
[4]   Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera:: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour [J].
Bamberg, Sebastian ;
Moeser, Guido .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 27 (01) :14-25
[5]   Can Protection Motivation Theory predict pro-environmental behavior? Explaining the adoption of electric vehicles in the Netherlands [J].
Bockarjova, M. ;
Steg, L. .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2014, 28 :276-288
[6]   Insights into Flood-Coping Appraisals of Protection Motivation Theory: Empirical Evidence from Germany and France [J].
Bubeck, Philip ;
Botzen, W. J. Wouter ;
Laudan, Jonas ;
Aerts, Jeroen C. J. H. ;
Thieken, Annegret H. .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2018, 38 (06) :1239-1257
[7]   COPING APPRAISAL AND PARENTS INTENTIONS TO INFORM THEIR CHILDREN ABOUT SEXUAL ABUSE - A PROTECTION MOTIVATION THEORY ANALYSIS [J].
CAMPIS, LK ;
PRENTICEDUNN, S ;
LYMAN, RD .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1989, 8 (03) :304-316
[8]   Impact of fear appeals on pro-environmental behavior and crucial determinants [J].
Chen, Mei-Fang .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVERTISING, 2016, 35 (01) :74-92
[9]  
Cismaru M, 2011, SOC MARK Q, V17, P62, DOI 10.1080/15245004.2011.595539
[10]  
Clayton Susan., 2005, ANAL SOC ISS PUB POL, V5, P87