Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures in the Emergency Department: What the Orthopedic Surgeon Wants to Know

被引:13
作者
Marshall, Richard A. [1 ]
Weaver, Michael J. [2 ]
Sodickson, Aaron [1 ]
Khurana, Bharti [1 ]
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Radiol, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY; VANCOUVER CLASSIFICATION; PROXIMAL FEMUR; RADIOGRAPHIC EVALUATION; REPLACEMENT; REVISION; COMPONENT; EPIDEMIOLOGY; RELIABILITY; PROJECTIONS;
D O I
10.1148/rg.2017160127
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Femoral fracture in the setting of a hip arthroplasty is an increasingly common complication encountered in the emergency department (ED). Diagnosis and management of periprosthetic fractures are complicated, and orthopedic surgeons rely on imaging findings to guide the appropriate management approach to the injury. Delay in identification and appropriate definitive management of periprosthetic fractures is associated with high morbidity and mortality. At present, the Vancouver classification system for periprosthetic hip fractures is the most common classification system used by orthopedic surgeons. It relies on three radiographic criteria-fracture location, prosthesis stability, and quality of the femoral bone stock-to characterize these fractures and to help guide management decisions. Familiarly with the Vancouver classification system allows radiologists to both recognize and communicate the most clinically relevant imaging findings to the treating orthopedic surgeon. This article reviews the imaging workup for hip pain in patients with a femoral prosthesis, risk factors for periprosthetic fracture, and the expected normal appearance of the most commonly encountered types of femoral prostheses. Fracture terminology and the Vancouver classification system are reviewed in a simplified algorithm with emphasis on the most common patterns of periprosthetic fractures, the radiologic determinants of prosthesis stability and bone quality, and the management implications of these imaging findings. Finally, multiple instructive clinical cases are used to demonstrate critical application of the classification system and to highlight the clinical implications of the imaging findings. (c) RSNA, 2017.
引用
收藏
页码:1202 / 1217
页数:16
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
Aldinger PR, 2003, ACTA ORTHOP SCAND, V74, P253, DOI 10.1080/00016470310014157
[2]  
[Anonymous], ACR APPR CRIT
[3]  
Bashinskaya B, 2012, ISRN ORTHOP, V2012
[4]   Epidemiology - Hip and knee [J].
Berry, DJ .
ORTHOPEDIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1999, 30 (02) :183-+
[5]  
BETHEA JS, 1982, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P95
[6]   Accuracy of EBRA-FCA in the measurement of migration of femoral components of total hip replacement [J].
Biedermann, R ;
Krismer, M ;
Stöckl, B ;
Mayrhofer, P ;
Ornstein, E ;
Franzén, H .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1999, 81B (02) :266-272
[7]   The reliability and validity of the Vancouver classification of femoral fractures after hip replacement [J].
Brady, OH ;
Garbuz, DS ;
Masri, BA ;
Duncan, CP .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2000, 15 (01) :59-62
[8]   Radiographic Evaluation of Hip Implants [J].
Chang, Connie Y. ;
Huang, Ambrose J. ;
Palmer, William E. .
SEMINARS IN MUSCULOSKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2015, 19 (01) :12-20
[9]  
Clark R, 1996, ORTHOPEDICS, V19, P1003
[10]   FRACTURES OF THE FEMUR IN RELATION TO CEMENTED HIP PROSTHESES [J].
COOKE, PH ;
NEWMAN, JH .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1988, 70 (03) :386-389