Probiotics for treatment of acute diarrhoea in children: randomised clinical trial of five different preparations

被引:205
作者
Canani, Roberto Berni
Cirillo, Pia
Terrin, Gianluca
Cesarano, Luisa
Spagnuolo, Maria Immacolata
De Vincenzo, Anna
Albano, Fabio
Passariello, Annalisa
De Marco, Giulio
Manguso, Francesco
Guarino, Alfredo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Naples Federico II, Dept Paediat, Naples, Italy
[2] Univ Naples Federico II, Dept Clin & Expt Med, Naples, Italy
来源
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2007年 / 335卷 / 7615期
关键词
D O I
10.1136/bmj.39272.581736.55
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To compare the efficacy of five probiotic preparations recommended to parents in the treatment of acute diarrhoea in children. Design Randomised controlled clinical trial in collaboration with family paediatricians over 12 months. Setting Primary care. Participants Children aged 3-36 months visiting a family paediatrician for acute diarrhoea. Intervention Children's parents were randomly assigned to receive written instructions to purchase a specific probiotic product: oral rehydration solution (control group); Lactobacillus rhamnosus strain GG; Saccharomyces boulardii; Bacillus clausii; mix of L delbrueckii var bulgaricus, Streptococcus thermophilus, L acidophilus, and Bificlobacterium bifidum; or Enterococcus faecium SF68. Main outcome measures Primary outcomes were duration of diarrhoea and daily number and consistency of stools. Secondary outcomes were duration of vomiting and fever and rate of admission to hospital. Safety and tolerance were also recorded. Results 571 children were allocated to intervention. Median duration of diarrhoea was significantly shorter (P<0.001) in children who received L rhamnosus strain GG (78.5 hours) and the mix of four bacterial strains (70.0 hours) than in children who received oral rehydration solution alone (115.0 hours). One day after the first probiotic administration, the daily number of stools was significantly tower (P(O.001) in children who received L rhamnosus strain GG and in thosewho received the probiotic mix than in the other groups. The remaining preparations did not affect primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes were similar in all groups. Conclusions Not all commercially available probiotic preparations are effective in children with acute in L of diarrhoea. Paediatricians should choose bacterial preparations based on effectiveness data. Trial registration number Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN56067537.
引用
收藏
页码:340 / +
页数:15
相关论文
共 81 条
  • [1] Alam Nure H, 2003, Paediatr Drugs, V5, P151, DOI 10.2165/00148581-200305030-00002
  • [2] Allen S.J., 2004, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, pCD003048, DOI [10.1002/14651858.CD003048.pub2, DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD003048.PUB2]
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2021, RET WORK MENT HLTH I
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1997, J MENT HLTH
  • [5] [Anonymous], GLLAMM MANUAL TECHNI
  • [6] [Anonymous], ADV NEUR PS
  • [7] HOME-BASED VERSUS OUTPATIENT INPATIENT CARE FOR PEOPLE WITH SERIOUS MENTAL-ILLNESS - PHASE-II OF A CONTROLLED-STUDY
    AUDINI, B
    MARKS, IM
    LAWRENCE, RE
    CONNOLLY, J
    WATTS, V
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1994, 165 : 204 - 210
  • [8] BELLOMO G, 1980, CURR THER RES CLIN E, V28, P927
  • [9] Outcome of case management based on the strengths model compared to standard care.: A randomised controlled trial
    Björkman, T
    Hansson, L
    Sandlund, M
    [J]. SOCIAL PSYCHIATRY AND PSYCHIATRIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2002, 37 (04) : 147 - 152
  • [10] Assertive community treatment for people with severe mental illness - Critical ingredients and impact on patients
    Bond, GR
    Drake, RE
    Mueser, KT
    Latimer, E
    [J]. DISEASE MANAGEMENT & HEALTH OUTCOMES, 2001, 9 (03) : 141 - 159