Yield Response of Spring Maize to Inter-Row Subsoiling and Soil Water Deficit in Northern China

被引:17
作者
Liu, Zhandong [1 ]
Qin, Anzhen [1 ]
Zhao, Ben [1 ]
Ata-Ul-Karim, Syed Tahir [2 ]
Xiao, Junfu [1 ]
Sun, Jingsheng [1 ]
Ning, Dongfeng [1 ]
Liu, Zugui [1 ]
Nan, Jiqin [1 ]
Duan, Aiwang [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Agr Sci, Key Lab Crop Water Use & Regulat, Minist Agr, Farmland Irrigat Res Inst, Xinxiang, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Agr Univ, Natl Engn & Technol Ctr Informat Agr, Jiangsu Key Lab Informat Agr, Jiangsu Collaborat Innovat Ctr Modern Crop Prod, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
来源
PLOS ONE | 2016年 / 11卷 / 04期
关键词
USE EFFICIENCY; CONSERVATION TILLAGE; GRAIN-YIELD; ROOT-GROWTH; WHEAT; COMPACTION; VERTISOL; CLIMATE; CARBON;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0153809
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Long-term tillage has been shown to induce water stress episode during crop growth period due to low water retention capacity. It is unclear whether integrated water conservation tillage systems, such asspringdeepinter-row subsoiling with annual or biennial repetitions, can be developed to alleviate this issue while improve crop productivity. Methods Experimentswere carried out in a spring maize cropping system on Calcaric-fluvicCambisol-satJiaozuoexperimentstation, northern China, in 2009 to 2014. Effects of threesubsoiling depths (i.e., 30 cm, 40 cm, and 50 cm) in combination with annual and biennial repetitions-wasdetermined in two single-years (i.e., 2012 and 2014) againstthe conventional tillage. The objectives were to investigateyield response to subsoiling depths and soil water deficit (SWD), and to identify the most effective subsoiling treatment using a systematic assessment. Results Annualsubsoiling to 50 cm (AS-50) increased soil water storage (SWS, mm) by an average of8% in 0-20 cm soil depth, 19% in 20-80 cm depth, and 10% in 80-120 cm depth, followed by AS-40 and BS-50, whereas AS-30 and BS-30 showed much less effects in increasing SWS across the 0-120 cm soil profile, compared to the CK. AS-50 significantly reduced soil water deficit (SWD, mm) by an average of123% during sowing to jointing, 318% during jointing to filling, and 221% during filling to maturity, compared to the CK, followed by AS-40 and BS-50. An integrated effect on increasing SWS and reducing SWD helped AS-50 boost grain yield by an average of 31% and biomass yield by 30%, compared to the CK. A power function for subsoiling depth and a negative linear function for SWD were used to fit the measured yields, showing the deepest subsoiling depth (50 cm) with the lowest SWD contributed to the highest yield. Systematic assessment showed that AS-50 received the highest evaluation index (0.69 out of 1.0) among all treatments. Conclusion Deepinter-row subsoilingwith annual repetition significantly boosts yield by alleviating SWD in critical growth period and increasing SWS in 20-80 cm soil depth. The results allow us to conclude that AS-50 can be adopted as an effective approach to increase crop productivity, alleviate water stress, and improve soil water availability for spring maize in northern China.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] The effect of subsoiling on soil resistance and cotton yield
    Akinci, I
    Cakir, E
    Topakci, M
    Canakci, M
    Inan, O
    [J]. SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2004, 77 (02) : 203 - 210
  • [2] Allen R. G., 1998, FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper
  • [3] SOIL AND PLANT-RESPONSE TO 3 SUBSOILING IMPLEMENTS
    BUSSCHER, WJ
    KARLEN, DL
    SOJKA, RE
    BURNHAM, KP
    [J]. SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1988, 52 (03) : 804 - 809
  • [4] Effect of subsoil tillage depth on nutrient accumulation, root distribution, and grain yield in spring maize
    Cai, Hongguang
    Ma, Wei
    Zhang, Xiuzhi
    Ping, Jieqing
    Yan, Xiaogong
    Liu, Jianzhao
    Yuan, Jingchao
    Wang, Lichun
    Ren, Jun
    [J]. CROP JOURNAL, 2014, 2 (05): : 297 - 307
  • [5] Tillage effects on plant extractable soil water in a silty clay vertisol in Southern Italy
    Castrignano, A
    Colucci, R
    DeGiorgio, D
    Rizzo, V
    Stelluti, M
    [J]. SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 1997, 40 (3-4) : 227 - 237
  • [6] Quantification of Soil Water Competition and Compensation Using Soil Water Differences between Strips of Intercropping
    Chen H.
    Qin A.
    Chai Q.
    Gan Y.
    Liu Z.
    [J]. Agricultural Research, 2014, 3 (4) : 321 - 330
  • [7] Comparison of canopy temperature-based water stress indices for maize
    DeJonge, Kendall C.
    Taghvaeian, Saleh
    Trout, Thomas J.
    Comas, Louise H.
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2015, 156 : 51 - 62
  • [8] Improving agricultural water use efficiency in arid and semiarid areas of China
    Deng, XP
    Shan, L
    Zhang, HP
    Turner, NC
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2006, 80 (1-3) : 23 - 40
  • [9] FAO IUSS Working Group WRB, 2006, World Soil Resources Reports, V103, DOI DOI 10.1017/S0014479706394902
  • [10] Improving farming practices reduces the carbon footprint of spring wheat production
    Gan, Yantai
    Liang, Chang
    Chai, Qiang
    Lemke, Reynald L.
    Campbell, Con A.
    Zentner, Robert P.
    [J]. NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2014, 5