Peak-load pricing with different types of dispatchability

被引:8
作者
Eisenack, Klaus [1 ]
Mier, Mathias [2 ]
机构
[1] Humboldt Univ, Resource Econ Grp, Unter Linden 6, D-10099 Berlin, Germany
[2] Ifo Inst, Ctr Energy Climate & Resources, Poschingerstr 5, D-81679 Munich, Germany
关键词
Cost recovery; Dispatchability; Energy transition; Flexibility; Market design; Peak-load pricing; Reliability; Renewables; MARKET DESIGN; ELECTRICITY MARKETS; WIND POWER; CAPACITY; GENERATION; STORAGE; RELIABILITY; TIME; RENEWABLES; ECONOMICS;
D O I
10.1007/s11149-019-09394-9
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We extend the theory of peak-load pricing by considering that the production with different technologies can be adjusted within their capacity at different speeds. In the established analysis, all production decisions can be made after the random variables realize. In our setting, in contrast, some decisions are made before, others after. This is important, e.g., when increasing capacities of renewables are integrated in electricity systems worldwide. We consider fixed load and three types of capacities: partially dispatchable capacity (e.g., nuclear power-plants) needs to be scheduled ahead of actual production, non-dispatchable capacity (e.g., wind turbines) produces randomly, and highly-dispatchable capacity (e.g., gas turbines) can instantly adjust. If capacities differ in their dispatchability, some standard results of peak-load pricing break down. For example, less capacity types will be employed. Either a system with partially dispatchable technologies only, or a system dominated by non-dispatchable technologies and supplemented by highly-dispatchables occurs. Non- and highly dispatchable technologies can be substitutes or complements. The probability of outage does not rise if non-dispatchable capacity becomes cheaper. In a system with non-dispatchables, capacity decisions cannot be decentralized by conventional markets because cost recovery is not possible. Thus, the integration of renewable electricity generators requires alternative market designs.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 124
页数:20
相关论文
共 64 条
[41]   Assessing the long-term system value of intermittent electric generation technologies [J].
Lamont, Alan D. .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2008, 30 (03) :1208-1231
[42]   Evaluation of Power System Flexibility [J].
Lannoye, Eamonn ;
Flynn, Damian ;
O'Malley, Mark .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2012, 27 (02) :922-931
[43]   Overview of current development in electrical energy storage technologies and the application potential in power system operation [J].
Luo, Xing ;
Wang, Jihong ;
Dooner, Mark ;
Clarke, Jonathan .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 137 :511-536
[44]  
Mier M, 2018, OLDENBURG DISCUSSION, VV-412-18, DOI [10.2139/ssrn.3477824, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.3477824]
[45]   Economics and design of balancing power markets in Germany [J].
Muesgens, Felix ;
Ockenfels, Axel ;
Peek, Markus .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL POWER & ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2014, 55 :392-401
[46]  
Neetzow P, 2019, WORKING PAPERS DEP A, V96/2019
[47]   Electricity storage and transmission: Complements or substitutes? [J].
Neetzow, Paul ;
Pechan, Anna ;
Eisenack, Klaus .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2018, 76 :367-377
[48]   Missing money and missing markets: Reliability, capacity auctions and interconnectors [J].
Newbery, David .
ENERGY POLICY, 2016, 94 :401-410
[49]   Market design for a large share of wind power [J].
Newbery, David .
ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (07) :3131-3134
[50]   Where do all the windmills go? Influence of the institutional setting on the spatial distribution of renewable energy installation [J].
Pechan, A. .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2017, 65 :75-86