Accuracy of automated three-dimensional ultrasound imaging technique for fetal head biometry

被引:24
作者
Pluym, I. D. [1 ]
Afshar, Y. [1 ]
Holliman, K. [1 ]
Kwan, L. [2 ]
Bolagani, A. [2 ]
Mok, T. [1 ]
Silver, B. [3 ]
Ramirez, E. [3 ]
Han, C. S. [1 ,3 ]
Platt, L. D. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Urol, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Ctr Fetal Med & Womens Ultrasound, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
artificial intelligence; automated ultrasound; computer‐ aided analysis; fetal brain; three‐ dimensional sonography; 2ND-TRIMESTER; ANOMALIES; PREGNANCY; DIAGNOSIS; PLANES;
D O I
10.1002/uog.22171
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objectives To evaluate the accuracy of an automated three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound technique for fetal intracranial measurements compared with manual acquisition. Methods This was a prospective observational study of patients presenting for routine anatomical survey between 18 + 0 and 22 + 6 weeks' gestation. After providing informed consent, each patient underwent two consecutive ultrasound examinations of the fetal head, one by a sonographer and one by a physician. Each operator obtained manual measurements of the biparietal diameter (BPD), head circumference (HC), transcerebellar diameter (TCD), cisterna magna (CM) and posterior horn of the lateral ventricle (Vp), followed by automated measurements of these structures using an artificial intelligence-based tool, SonoCNS (R) Fetal Brain. Both operators repeated the automated approach until all five measurements were obtained in a single sweep, up to a maximum of three attempts. The accuracy of automated measurements was compared with that of manual measurements using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) by operator type, accounting for patient and ultrasound characteristics. Results One hundred and forty-three women were enrolled in the study. Median body mass index was 24.0 kg/m(2) (interquartile range (IQR), 22.5-26.8 kg/m(2)) and median subcutaneous thickness was 1.6 cm (IQR, 1.3-2.0 cm). Fifteen (10%) patients had at least one prior Cesarean delivery, 17 (12%) had other abdominal surgery and 78 (55%) had an anterior placenta. Successful acquisition of the automated measurements was achieved on the first, second and third attempts in 70%, 22% and 3% of patients, respectively, by sonographers and in 76%, 16% and 3% of cases, respectively, by physicians. The automated algorithm was not able to identify and measure all five structures correctly in six (4%) and seven (5%) patients scanned by the sonographers and physicians, respectively. The ICCs reflected good reliability (0.80-0.88) of the automated compared with the manual approach for BPD and HC and poor to moderate reliability (0.23-0.50) for TCD, CM and Vp. Fetal lie, head position, placental location, maternal subcutaneous thickness and prior Cesarean section were not associated with the success or accuracy of the automated technique. Conclusions Automated 3D ultrasound imaging of the fetal head using SonoCNS reliably identified and measured BPD and HC but was less consistent in accurately identifying and measuring TCD, CM and Vp. While these results are encouraging, further optimization of the automated technology is necessary prior to incorporation of the technique into routine sonographic protocols. (c) 2020 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
引用
收藏
页码:798 / 803
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Automated retrieval of standard diagnostic fetal cardiac ultrasound planes in the second trimester of pregnancy: a prospective evaluation of software [J].
Abuhamad, A. ;
Falkensammer, P. ;
Reichartseder, F. ;
Zhao, Y. .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 31 (01) :30-36
[2]   Artificial intelligence and amniotic fluid multiomics: prediction of perinatal outcome in asymptomatic women with short cervix [J].
Bahado-Singh, R. O. ;
Sonek, J. ;
McKenna, D. ;
Cool, D. ;
Aydas, B. ;
Turkoglu, O. ;
Bjorndahl, T. ;
Mandel, R. ;
Wishart, D. ;
Friedman, P. ;
Graham, S. F. ;
Yilmaz, A. .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 54 (01) :110-118
[3]   Recent Development in Three and Four Dimension Fetal Echocardiography [J].
Chaoui, Rabih ;
Abuhamad, Alfred ;
Martins, Juliana ;
Heling, Kai Sven .
FETAL DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY, 2020, 47 (05) :345-353
[4]   Prevalence and Trends in Prepregnancy Normal Weight-48 States, New York City, and District of Columbia, 2011-2015 [J].
Deputy, Nicholas P. ;
Dub, Bhanuja ;
Sharma, Andrea J. .
MMWR-MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY WEEKLY REPORT, 2018, 66 (51-52) :1402-1407
[5]   Two-Dimensional Speckle Tracking of the Fetal Heart A Practical Step-by-Step Approach for the Fetal Sonologist [J].
DeVore, Greggory R. ;
Polanco, Bardo ;
Satou, Gary ;
Sklansky, Mark .
JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2016, 35 (08) :1765-1781
[6]   Introduction to artificial intelligence in ultrasound imaging in obstetrics and gynecology [J].
Drukker, L. ;
Noble, J. A. ;
Papageorghiou, A. T. .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 56 (04) :498-505
[7]   Does the Use of Automated Fetal Biometry Improve Clinical Work Flow Efficiency? [J].
Espinoza, Jimmy ;
Good, Sara ;
Russell, Evie ;
Lee, Wesley .
JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2013, 32 (05) :847-850
[8]   Artificial intelligence assistance for fetal head biometry: Assessment of automated measurement software [J].
Grandjean, G. Ambroise ;
Hossu, G. ;
Bertholdt, C. ;
Noble, P. ;
Morel, O. ;
Grange, G. .
DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL IMAGING, 2018, 99 (11) :709-716
[9]   A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research [J].
Koo, Terry K. ;
Li, Mae Y. .
JOURNAL OF CHIROPRACTIC MEDICINE, 2016, 15 (02) :155-163
[10]  
Loch T, 1999, PROSTATE, V39, P198