On thermal properties of metallic powder in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing

被引:44
|
作者
Zhang, Shanshan [1 ]
Lane, Brandon [2 ]
Whiting, Justin [2 ]
Chou, Kevin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Louisville, Dept Ind Engn, Louisville, KY 40292 USA
[2] NIST, Engn Lab, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA
关键词
Laser powder-bed fusion; Laser flash; Finite element modeling; Inverse method; Powder thermal conductivity; HOT-WIRE METHOD; CONDUCTIVITY; DIFFUSIVITY; RESISTANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.09.012
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Powder thermal properties play a critical role in laser powder-bed fusion (LPBF) additive manufacturing, specifically, the reduced effective thermal conductivity compared to that of the solid significantly affects heat conduction, which can influence the melt pool characteristics, and consequently, the part mechanical properties. This study intends to indirectly measure the thermal conductivity of metallic powder, nickel-based super alloy 625 (IN625) and Ti-6Al-4V (Ti64), in LPBF using a combined approach that consists of laser flash analysis, finite element (FE) heat transfer modeling and a multivariate inverse method. The test specimens were designed and fabricated by a LPBF system to encapsulate powder in a hollow disk to imitate powder-bed conditions. The as-built specimens were then subjected to laser flash testing to measure the transient thermal response. Next, an FE model replicate the hollow disk samples and laser flash testing was developed. A multi-point optimization algorithm was used to inversely extract the thermal conductivity of LPBF powder from the FE model based on the measured transient thermal response. The results indicate that the thermal conductivity of IN625 powder used in LPBF ranges from 0.65 W/(m.K) to 1.02 W/(m.K) at 100 degrees C and 500 degrees C, respectively, showing a linear relationship with the temperature. On the other hand, Ti64 powder has a lower thermal conductivity than IN625 powder, about 35% to 40% smaller. However, the thermal conductivity ratio of the powder to the respective solid counterpart is quite similar between the two materials, about 4.2% to 6.9% for IN625 and 3.4% to 5.2% for Ti64.
引用
收藏
页码:382 / 392
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Laser powder bed fusion for metal additive manufacturing: perspectives on recent developments
    Sing, S. L.
    Yeong, W. Y.
    VIRTUAL AND PHYSICAL PROTOTYPING, 2020, 15 (03) : 359 - 370
  • [42] Laser Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing of Recycled Zircaloy-4
    Soung Yeoul Ahn
    Sang Guk Jeong
    Eun Seong Kim
    Suk Hoon Kang
    Jungho Choe
    Joo Young Ryu
    Dae Woon Choi
    Jin Seok Lee
    Jung-Wook Cho
    Takayoshi Nakano
    Hyoung Seop Kim
    Metals and Materials International, 2023, 29 : 2760 - 2766
  • [43] Alloy design for laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing: a critical review
    Zhuangzhuang Liu
    Qihang Zhou
    Xiaokang Liang
    Xiebin Wang
    Guichuan Li
    Kim Vanmeensel
    Jianxin Xie
    International Journal of Extreme Manufacturing, 2024, 6 (02) : 33 - 68
  • [44] Spattering mechanism of laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing on heterogeneous surfaces
    Toshi-Taka Ikeshoji
    Makiko Yonehara
    Chika Kato
    Yuma Yanaga
    Koki Takeshita
    Hideki Kyogoku
    Scientific Reports, 12
  • [45] A mechanistic explanation of shrinkage porosity in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing
    Templeton, William Frieden
    Hinnebusch, Shawn
    Strayer, Seth T.
    To, Albert C.
    Pistorius, P. Chris
    Narra, Sneha Prabha
    ACTA MATERIALIA, 2024, 266
  • [46] Composition regulation of composite materials in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing
    Yao, Dengzhi
    Wang, Ju
    Cai, Yao
    Zhao, Tingting
    An, Xizhong
    Zhang, Hao
    Fu, Haitao
    Yang, Xiaohong
    Zou, Qingchuan
    Wang, Lin
    POWDER TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 408
  • [47] Dynamics of pore formation during laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing
    Aiden A. Martin
    Nicholas P. Calta
    Saad A. Khairallah
    Jenny Wang
    Phillip J. Depond
    Anthony Y. Fong
    Vivek Thampy
    Gabe M. Guss
    Andrew M. Kiss
    Kevin H. Stone
    Christopher J. Tassone
    Johanna Nelson Weker
    Michael F. Toney
    Tony van Buuren
    Manyalibo J. Matthews
    Nature Communications, 10
  • [48] ON CHARACTERIZING UNCERTAINTY SOURCES IN LASER POWDER BED FUSION ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING MODELS
    Moges, Tesfaye
    Witherell, Paul
    Ameta, Gaurav
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL ENGINEERING CONGRESS AND EXPOSITION, 2019, VOL 2A, 2019,
  • [49] Research Progress on Laser Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing of Zinc Alloys
    Meng, Fuxiang
    Du, Yulei
    MATERIALS, 2024, 17 (17)
  • [50] A METHOD FOR CHARACTERIZING MODEL FIDELITY IN LASER POWDER BED FUSION ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING
    Assouroko, Ibrahim
    Lopez, Felipe
    Witherell, Paul
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL ENGINEERING CONGRESS AND EXPOSITION, 2016, VOL. 2, 2016,