Factors influencing the decision to convey or not to convey elderly people to the emergency department after emergency ambulance attendance: a systematic mixed studies review

被引:49
作者
Oosterwold, Johan [1 ,2 ]
Sagel, Dennis [3 ]
Berben, Sivera [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Roodbol, Petrie [1 ]
Broekhuis, Manda [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Hlth Sci Nursing Res, Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Appl Sci, NHL Stenden, Leeuwarden, Netherlands
[3] Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Ambulance Dept, Roden, Netherlands
[4] HAN Univ Appl Sci, Fac Hlth & Social Studies, Res Dept Emergency & Crit Care, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[5] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Eastern Reg Emergency Healthcare Network, Med Ctr, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[6] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Radboud Inst Hlth Sci, IQ Healthcare, Med Ctr, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[7] Fac Econ & Business, Operat Dept, Groningen, Netherlands
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2018年 / 8卷 / 08期
关键词
decision making; emergency medical service; aged; mixed atudies review; conveyance; non-conveyance; MEDICAL-SERVICES; OLDER-PEOPLE; CARE; TRANSPORT; NURSES; NETHERLANDS; POPULATION; PARAMEDICS; RESIDENTS; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021732
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background The decision over whether to convey after emergency ambulance attendance plays a vital role in preventing avoidable admissions to a hospital's emergency department (ED). This is especially important with the elderly, for whom the likelihood and frequency of adverse events are greatest. Objective To provide a structured overview of factors influencing the conveyance decision of elderly people to the ED after emergency ambulance attendance, and the outcomes of these decisions. Data sources A mixed studies review of empirical studies was performed based on systematic searches, without date restrictions, in PubMed, CINAHL and Embase (April 2018). Twenty-nine studies were included. Study eligibility criteria Only studies with evidence gathered after an emergency medical service (EMS) response in a prehospital setting that focused on factors that influence the decision whether to convey an elderly patient were included. Setting Prehospital, EMS setting; participants to include EMS staff and/or elderly patients after emergency ambulance attendance. Study appraisal and synthesis methods The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used in appraising the included articles. Data were assessed using a best fit' framework synthesis approach. Results ED referral by EMS staff is determined by many factors, and not only the acuteness of the medical emergency. Factors that increase the likelihood of non-conveyance are: non-conveyance guidelines, use of feedback loop, the experience, confidence, educational background and composition (male-female) of the EMS staff attending and consulting a physician, EMS colleague or other healthcare provider. Factors that boost the likelihood of conveyance are: being held liable, a lack of organisational support, of confidence and/or of baseline health information, and situational circumstances. Findings are presented in an overarching framework that includes the impact of these factors on the decision's outcomes. Conclusion Many non-medical factors influence the ED conveyance decision after emergency ambulance attendance, and this makes it a complex issue to manage.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 80 条
  • [1] A comparison of ambulance responses to incidents of Medical Emergency Teams led by nurses and paramedics-A retrospective single-center study
    Aftyka, Anna
    Rudnicka-Drozak, Ewa
    Rybojad, Beata
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2014, 51 (04) : 555 - 561
  • [2] IMPACT OF INTERVENTIONS FOR PATIENTS REFUSING EMERGENCY MEDICAL-SERVICES TRANSPORT
    ALICANDRO, J
    HOLLANDER, JE
    HENRY, MC
    SCIAMMARELLA, J
    STAPLETON, E
    GENTILE, D
    [J]. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1995, 2 (06) : 480 - 485
  • [3] Almeida SL, 2004, EMERG MED CLIN N AM, V22117-29
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2007, J HEALTH SERV RES PO
  • [5] Reasons for intentional guideline non-adherence: A systematic review
    Arts, Derk L.
    Voncken, Albertine G.
    Medlock, Stephanie
    Abu-Hanna, Ameen
    van Weert, Henk C. P. M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2016, 89 : 55 - 62
  • [6] Paramedic Determinations of Medical Necessity: A Meta-Analysis
    Brown, Lawrence H.
    Hubble, Michael W.
    Cone, David C.
    Millin, Michael G.
    Schwartz, Brian
    Patterson, P. Daniel
    Greenberg, Brad
    Richards, Michael E.
    [J]. PREHOSPITAL EMERGENCY CARE, 2009, 13 (04) : 516 - 527
  • [7] Decision-making by ambulance clinicians in London when managing patients with epilepsy: a qualitative study
    Burrell, Lisa
    Noble, Adam
    Ridsdale, Leone
    [J]. EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2013, 30 (03) : 236 - 240
  • [8] Refusal of out-of-hospital medical care: Effect of medical-control physician assertiveness on transport rate
    Burstein, JL
    Hollander, JE
    Delagi, R
    Gold, M
    Henry, MC
    Alicandro, JM
    [J]. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1998, 5 (01) : 4 - 8
  • [9] Analysis of ambulance transports and diversions among US emergency departments
    Burt, CW
    McCaig, LF
    Valverde, RH
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2006, 47 (04) : 317 - 326
  • [10] "Best fit" framework synthesis: refining the method
    Carroll, Christopher
    Booth, Andrew
    Leaviss, Joanna
    Rick, Jo
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2013, 13