Forceps delivery and the use of synthetic opioid analgesia during epidural anaesthesia

被引:1
作者
Aubard, Y
Fourgeaud, V
Collet, D
Grandchamp, P
Vincelot, A
机构
[1] Limoges Univ Hosp, Dept Gynaecol & Obstet, Limoges, France
[2] Limoges Univ Hosp, Dept Anaesthesiol, Limoges, France
来源
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY | 2003年 / 106卷 / 02期
关键词
epidural analgesia; instrumental extraction; forceps;
D O I
10.1016/S0301-2115(02)00223-3
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To verify whether the use of sufentanil during obstetric epidural anaesthesia (EA) was accompanied by an increase in the rate of instrumental extraction. Study design: We made a retrospective comparison of deliveries that occurred during two 3-year periods (1993-1995, and 1997-1999), before and after the introduction of sufentanil into our protocol for epidural anaesthesia. Results: The first period covered 4694 deliveries compared with 5310 in the second; for these periods, the EA rate rose from 48.55 to 63.36% (P = 0.0001). The rates of uncomplicated vaginal delivery, forceps delivery and caesarian section over the two periods were 70.24, 12.76 and 17% versus 67.08, 14.41 and 18.51%, respectively: the differences were statistically significant. The indications for the use of forceps did not differ during the two periods. During vaginal delivery, the rate of forceps use as a function of EA administration/non-administration was remarkably constant over the two periods: 25.8% with EA versus 6.2% without EA in the first period compared with 24.9 and 6.2% in the second period. The forceps delivery rate was unaffected by the fact that EA was carried out by an anaesthetist specialised in obstetrics. Conclusion: The addition of sufentanil to our protocol for EA has not altered the practice of instrumental extraction in our department. With EA, the rate of forceps delivery is multiplied by 4, irrespective of the protocol used. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:130 / 133
页数:4
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Asselineau D, 1996, CONTRACEPT FERTIL S, V24, P505
  • [2] AUBARD Y, 1988, GAZETTE MED, V7, P61
  • [3] *AUDIPOG, 1999, RES SENT MIS COMM DO
  • [4] Lack of effect of walking on labor and delivery
    Bloom, SL
    McIntire, DD
    Kelly, MA
    Beimer, HL
    Burpo, RH
    Garcia, MA
    Leveno, KJ
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 339 (02) : 76 - 79
  • [5] HAWKINS JL, 1995, REGION ANESTH, V20, P50
  • [6] Epidural analgesia as a risk factor for operative delivery
    Hemminki, E
    Gissler, M
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 1996, 53 (02) : 125 - 132
  • [7] LUMBAR EPIDURAL ANALGESIA IN LABOR - RELATION TO FETAL MALPOSITION AND INSTRUMENTAL DELIVERY
    HOULT, IJ
    MACLENNAN, AH
    CARRIE, LES
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1977, 1 (6052) : 14 - 16
  • [8] EPIDURAL ANALGESIA AND UTERINE FUNCTION
    NEWTON, ER
    SCHROEDER, BC
    KNAPE, KG
    BENNETT, BL
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1995, 85 (05) : 749 - 755
  • [9] EPIDURAL-ANESTHESIA IN LABOR - INFLUENCE ON SURGICAL DELIVERY RATES, INTRAPARTUM FEVER AND BLOOD-LOSS
    PLOECKINGER, B
    ULM, MR
    CHALUBINSKI, K
    GRUBER, W
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION, 1995, 39 (01) : 24 - 27
  • [10] STEINBERG RB, 1989, REGION ANESTH, V14, P225