Access and care issues in urban urgent care clinic patients

被引:22
作者
Scott, David R. [3 ]
Batal, Holly A. [1 ]
Majeres, Sharon [1 ]
Adams, Jill C. [1 ]
Dale, Rita [2 ]
Mehler, Philip S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Denver Hlth Med Ctr, Denver, CO 80204 USA
[2] Colorado Prevent Ctr, Denver, CO 80203 USA
[3] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Portland, OR 97239 USA
关键词
NONURGENT EMERGENCY; VISITS; IMMUNIZATION; FEASIBILITY; SERVICE; COSTS;
D O I
10.1186/1472-6963-9-222
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Although primary care should be the cornerstone of medical practice, inappropriate use of urgent care for non-urgent patients is a growing problem that has significant economic and healthcare consequences. The characteristics of patients who choose the urgent care setting, as well as the reasoning behind their decisions, is not well established. The purpose of this study was to determine the motivation behind, and characteristics of, adult patients who choose to access health care in our urgent care clinic. The relevance of understanding the motivation driving this patient population is especially pertinent given recent trends towards universal healthcare and the unclear impact it may have on the demands of urgent care. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of patients seeking care at an urgent care clinic (UCC) within a large acute care safety-net urban hospital over a six-week period. Survey data included demographics, social and economic information, reasons that patients chose a UCC, previous primary care exposure, reasons for delaying care, and preventive care needs. Results: A total of 1, 006 patients were randomly surveyed. Twenty-five percent of patients identified Spanish as their preferred language. Fifty-four percent of patients reported choosing the UCC due to not having to make an appointment, 51.2% because it was convenient, 43.9% because of same day test results, 42.7% because of ability to get same-day medications and 15.1% because co-payment was not mandatory. Lack of a regular physician was reported by 67.9% of patients and 57.2% lacked a regular source of care. Patients reported delaying access to care for a variety of reasons. Conclusion: Despite a common belief that patients seek care in the urgent care setting primarily for economic reasons, this study suggests that patients choose the urgent care setting based largely on convenience and more timely care. This information is especially applicable to the potential increase in urgent care volume in a universal healthcare system. Additionally, this study adds to the body of literature supporting the important role of timely primary care in healthcare maintenance.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Nonurgent emergency department patient characteristics and barriers to primary care
    Afilalo, J
    Marinovich, A
    Afilalo, M
    Colacone, A
    Léger, R
    Unger, B
    Giguère, C
    [J]. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2004, 11 (12) : 1302 - 1310
  • [2] American Academy of Family Physicians American Academy of Pediatrics, 2007, JOINT PRINC PAT CENT
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1998, Applied Regression Analysis
  • [4] Ansell D, 2002, J HEALTH CARE POOR U, V13, P171
  • [5] BABCOCK IC, 2000, ACAD EMERG MED, V7, P1421
  • [6] DETERMINANTS OF EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT USE BY AMBULATORY PATIENTS AT AN URBAN PUBLIC HOSPITAL
    BAKER, DW
    STEVENS, CD
    BROOK, RH
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1995, 25 (03) : 311 - 316
  • [7] EXCESS COST OF EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT VISITS FOR NONURGENT CARE
    BAKER, LC
    BAKER, LS
    [J]. HEALTH AFFAIRS, 1994, 13 (05) : 162 - 171
  • [8] Patient and physician perceptions of timely access to care
    Barry, DW
    Melhado, TV
    Chacko, KM
    Lee, RSM
    Steiner, JF
    Kutner, JS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2006, 21 (02) : 130 - 133
  • [9] Cervical cancer screening in the urgent care setting
    Batal, H
    Biggerstaff, S
    Dunn, T
    Mehler, PS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2000, 15 (06) : 389 - 394
  • [10] The Future of Primary Care: Transforming Practice
    Bodenheimer, Thomas
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2008, 359 (20) : 2086 - +