Tend to Compare and Tend to Be Fair: The Relationship between Social Comparison Sensitivity and Justice Sensitivity

被引:13
作者
Zhen, Shanshan [1 ,2 ]
Yu, Rongjun [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] S China Normal Univ, Ctr Studies Psychol Applicat, Sch Psychol, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] S China Normal Univ, Key Lab Mental Hlth & Cognit Sci Guangdong Prov, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Psychol, Singapore 117548, Singapore
[4] Natl Univ Singapore, Ctr Life Sci, Singapore Inst Neurotechnol SINAPSE, Singapore 117548, Singapore
[5] Natl Univ Singapore, Ctr Life Sci, Neurobiology Aging Programme, Singapore 117548, Singapore
来源
PLOS ONE | 2016年 / 11卷 / 05期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
ULTIMATUM GAME; STRONG RECIPROCITY; NEURAL BASIS; BRAIN; ENVY; COOPERATION; EXPERIENCES; PUNISHMENT; RESPONSES; EVOLUTION;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0155414
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Social comparison is a prerequisite for processing fairness, although the two types of cognition may be associated with different emotions. Whereas social comparison may induce envy, the perception of unfairness may elicit anger. Yet, it remains unclear whether people who tend to have a strong sense of fairness also tend to compare themselves more with others. Here, Study 1 used a modified ultimatum game (UG) and a social comparison game (SCG) to examine the relationship between justice sensitivity and social comparison sensitivity in 51 young adults. Study 2 examined self-reported social comparison and justice sensitivity in 142 young adults. Both studies showed a positive correlation between social comparison sensitivity and justice sensitivity. We reason that social comparison and justice sensitivity have an important positive correlation in human decision-making. The rejection of self-disadvantageous inequality offers may be due to the social comparison effect, which suggests that the tendency to compare oneself with others may contribute to having a strong sense of justice. Our findings suggest that the predictions of game theory may vary depending on the social culture context and incorporating notions of fairness and social comparison tendency may be essential to better predict the actual behavior of players in social interactive situations.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   Confusion or fairness in the field? Rejections in the ultimatum game under the strategy method [J].
Bahry, DL ;
Wilson, RK .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2006, 60 (01) :37-54
[2]   Social comparisons in ultimatum bargaining [J].
Bohnet, I ;
Zeckhauser, R .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2004, 106 (03) :495-510
[3]   The evolution of strong reciprocity: cooperation in heterogeneous populations [J].
Bowles, S ;
Gintis, H .
THEORETICAL POPULATION BIOLOGY, 2004, 65 (01) :17-28
[4]   Fair and unfair punishers coexist in the Ultimatum Game [J].
Branas-Garza, Pablo ;
Espin, Antonio M. ;
Exadaktylos, Filippos ;
Herrmann, Benedikt .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2014, 4
[5]   Evolution of responses to (un)fairness [J].
Brosnan, Sarah F. ;
de Waal, Frans B. M. .
SCIENCE, 2014, 346 (6207) :314-+
[6]  
Buunk A.P., 2006, SOCIAL COMP SOCIAL P, P15, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511584329.003
[7]   Neuroticism and social comparison orientation as moderators of affective responses to social comparison at work [J].
Buunk, BP ;
Van der Zee, K ;
VanYperen, NW .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2001, 69 (05) :745-763
[8]   ULTIMATUMS, DICTATORS AND MANNERS [J].
CAMERER, C ;
THALER, RH .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 1995, 9 (02) :209-219
[9]  
Camerer C., 2003, Behavioral game theory: Experiments in strategic interaction
[10]   Behavioural studies of strategic thinking in games [J].
Camerer, CF .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2003, 7 (05) :225-231