Two-stage cross-efficiency evaluation based on prospect theory

被引:13
作者
Shao, Xing [1 ]
Wang, Meiqiang [1 ]
机构
[1] Guizhou Univ, Guiyang, Guizhou, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Data envelopment analysis; sustainability; supply chain; cross-efficiency evaluation; prospect theory; DECISION-MAKING; DEA; MODELS; RISK;
D O I
10.1080/01605682.2021.1918587
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Cross-efficiency evaluation in data envelopment analysis (DEA) is effective for evaluating the efficiency of decision-making units (DMUs). The use of cross-efficiency evaluation methods based on prospect theory has recently increased. However, the internal structure of DMUs is often ignored in efficiency evaluation; further, a fixed status quo is often selected as the reference point to calculate relative gains and losses, which is not ideal in the context of prospect theory. To address these issues, we investigate the basic two-stage cross-efficiency evaluation in DEA based on prospect theory. An optimism coefficient is introduced to formulate parameterised dynamic reference points, and a target identification model is developed to obtain target efficiency values that are attainable for all DMUs. Based on the prospect value and target efficiency values, we propose multiple novel aggressive, benevolent, and neutral two-stage cross-efficiency evaluation models. The models proposed herein can be applied to various decision environments and arbitrarily extended to other network system structures. A case study in sustainable supplier selection is performed to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed models for DMU ranking. The sensitivity analysis results show that the psychological characteristics of the decision maker under risk affect the evaluation results.
引用
收藏
页码:1620 / 1632
页数:13
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Loss aversion under prospect theory: A parameter-free measurement [J].
Abdellaoui, Mohammed ;
Bleichrodt, Han ;
Paraschiv, Corina .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2007, 53 (10) :1659-1674
[3]   The fixed weighting nature of a cross-evaluation model [J].
Anderson, TR ;
Hollingsworth, K ;
Inman, L .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2002, 17 (03) :249-255
[4]   Additive Utility in Prospect Theory [J].
Bleichrodt, Han ;
Schmidt, Ulrich ;
Zank, Horst .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2009, 55 (05) :863-873
[5]   APPLIED DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS [J].
BOUSSOFIANE, A ;
DYSON, RG ;
THANASSOULIS, E .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1991, 52 (01) :1-15
[6]   A classification of DEA models when the internal structure of the Decision Making Units is considered [J].
Castelli, Lorenzo ;
Pesenti, Raffaele ;
Ukovich, Walter .
ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2010, 173 (01) :207-235
[7]   MEASURING EFFICIENCY OF DECISION-MAKING UNITS [J].
CHARNES, A ;
COOPER, WW ;
RHODES, E .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1978, 2 (06) :429-444
[8]   Evaluation of China's electric energy efficiency under environmental constraints: A DEA cross efficiency model based on game relationship [J].
Chen, Wen ;
Zhou, Kaile ;
Yang, Shanlin .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 164 :38-44
[9]  
Despotis DK, 2002, J OPER RES SOC, V53, P314, DOI [10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601253, 10.1057/palgrave/jors/2601253]
[10]   A Technique for Supply Chain Network Design under Uncertainty using Cross-Efficiency Fuzzy Data Envelopment Analysis [J].
Dotoli, Mariagrazia ;
Epicoco, Nicola ;
Falagario, Marco .
IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2015, 48 (03) :634-639