An empirical study of different diagnostic criteria for delirium among elderly medical inpatients

被引:19
作者
Cole, MG
Dendukuri, N
McCusker, J
Han, L
机构
[1] St Marys Hosp, Dept Psychiat, Montreal, PQ H3T 1M5, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] St Marys Hosp, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Community Studies, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1176/jnp.15.2.200
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
This study compared the sensitivity and specificity of DSM-IV criteria for delirium with the sensitivity and specificity, of DSM-III and ICD-10 criteria among elderly medical inpatients with or without dementia. Secondary objectives were to examine the effect of changing the definition of criterion A on sensitivity and specificity and to compare the sensitivity and specificity of different numbers of symptoms of delirium. A total of 322 elderly patients who had been admitted from the emergency department to the medical services were classified into one of four groups using DSM-III-R criteria: delirium and dementia (n = 128), delirium only (n = 40), dementia only (n = 94), and neither (n = 60). The sensitivity and specificity of DSM-IV, DSM-III, and ICD-10 criteria were determined against DSM-III-R criteria using three definitions of criterion A (clouding of consciousness only, clouding of consciousness and inattention, clouding of consciousness or inattention). When criterion A was defined as clouding of consciousness or inattention, the sensitivity and specificity of DSM-IV, DSM-III, and ICD-10 criteria were 100% and 71%, 96% and 91%, and 61% and 91%, respectively. The results were similar among patients with or without dementia. The lower specificity of DSM-IV was accounted for by its inclusion of patients who did not show disorganized thinking. DSM-IV criteria for delirium are the most inclusive criteria to date for elderly medical patients with or without dementia.
引用
收藏
页码:200 / 207
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
American Psychiatric Association (APA), 2013, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT, P5
[2]   The efficacy of 2 different dosages of methylphenidate in treating adults with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder [J].
Bouffard, R ;
Hechtman, L ;
Minde, K ;
Iaboni-Kassab, F .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE, 2003, 48 (08) :546-554
[3]   ASSESSING ILLNESS SEVERITY - DOES CLINICAL JUDGMENT WORK [J].
CHARLSON, ME ;
SAX, FL ;
MACKENZIE, CR ;
FIELDS, SD ;
BRAHAM, RL ;
DOUGLAS, RG .
JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1986, 39 (06) :439-452
[4]  
COLE MG, 1994, CAN MED ASSOC J, V151, P965
[5]   Bayesian approaches to modeling the conditional dependence between multiple diagnostic tests [J].
Dendukuri, N ;
Joseph, L .
BIOMETRICS, 2001, 57 (01) :158-167
[6]   SHORT PORTABLE MENTAL STATUS QUESTIONNAIRE AS A SCREENING-TEST FOR DEMENTIA AND DELIRIUM AMONG THE ELDERLY [J].
ERKINJUNTTI, T ;
SULKAVA, R ;
WIKSTROM, J ;
AUTIO, L .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 1987, 35 (05) :412-416
[7]  
FARAONE SV, 1994, AM J PSYCHIAT, V151, P650
[8]  
Fillenbaum G., 1978, MULTIDIMENSIONAL FUN, V2nd ed
[9]   MINI-MENTAL STATE - PRACTICAL METHOD FOR GRADING COGNITIVE STATE OF PATIENTS FOR CLINICIAN [J].
FOLSTEIN, MF ;
FOLSTEIN, SE ;
MCHUGH, PR .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 1975, 12 (03) :189-198
[10]   CLARIFYING CONFUSION - THE CONFUSION ASSESSMENT METHOD - A NEW METHOD FOR DETECTION OF DELIRIUM [J].
INOUYE, SK ;
VANDYCK, CH ;
ALESSI, CA ;
BALKIN, S ;
SIEGAL, AP ;
HORWITZ, RI .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1990, 113 (12) :941-948