Final 12-year follow-up of surgery versus surveillance in the UK small aneurysm trial

被引:233
作者
Powell, J. T.
Brown, L. C.
Forbes, J. F.
Fowkes, F. G. R.
Greenhalgh, R. M.
Ruckley, C. V.
Thompson, S. G.
机构
[1] Imperial Coll Charing Cross, Vasc Surg Res Grp, Charing Cross Hosp, London W6 8RP, England
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[3] Univ Cambridge, Med Res Council Biostat Unit, Inst Publ Hlth, Cambridge, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1002/bjs.5778
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The aim was to determine whether early open surgical repair would benefit patients with small abdominal aortic aneurysm compared with surveillance on long-term follow-up. Methods: The 1090 patients who were enrolled into the UK Small Aneurysm Trial between 1991 and 1995 were followed up for aneurysm repair and mortality until November 2005. Results: By November 2005, 714 patients (65.5 per cent) had died, 929 (85.2 per cent) had undergone aneurysm repair, 150 (13.8 per cent) had died without aneurysm repair and 11 (1.0 per cent) remained alive without aneurysm repair. After 12 years, mortality in the surgery and surveillance groups was 63.9 and 67.3 percent respectively, unadjusted hazard ratio 0.90 (P=0.139). Three-quarters of the surveillance group eventually had aneurysm repair, with a 30-day elective mortality of 6.3 per cent (versus 5.0 per cent in the early surgery group, P=0.366). Estimates suggested that the cost of treatment was 17 per cent higher in the early surgery group, with a mean difference of 1326 pound. The death rate in these patients was about twice that in the population matched for age and sex. Conclusion: There was no long-term survival benefit of early elective open repair of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. Even after successful aneurysm repair, the mortality among these patients was higher than in the general population.
引用
收藏
页码:702 / 708
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   The Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS) into the effect of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening on mortality in men: a randomised controlled trial [J].
Ashton, HA ;
Buxton, MJ ;
Day, NE ;
Kim, LG ;
Marteau, TM ;
Scott, RAP ;
Thomspon, SG ;
Walker, NM .
LANCET, 2002, 360 (9345) :1531-1539
[2]   OPERATIVE MORTALITY AND LONG-TERM RELATIVE SURVIVAL OF PATIENTS OPERATED ON FOR ASYMPTOMATIC ABDOMINAL AORTIC-ANEURYSM [J].
AUNE, S ;
AMUNDSEN, SR ;
EVJENSVOLD, J ;
TRIPPESTAD, A .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1995, 9 (03) :293-298
[3]   Two-year outcomes after conventional or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms [J].
Blankensteijn, JD ;
de Jong, SECA ;
Prinssen, M ;
van der Ham, AC ;
Buth, J ;
van Sterkenburg, SMM ;
Verhagen, HJM ;
Buskens, E ;
Grobbee, DE .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 352 (23) :2398-2405
[4]  
Brady AR, 2002, NEW ENGL J MED, V346, P1445
[5]   Comparison of surveillance vs aortic endografting for small aneurysm repair (CAESAR) trial:: Study design and progress [J].
Cao, P .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2005, 30 (03) :245-251
[6]  
Forbes JF, 1998, LANCET, V352, P1656
[7]  
GRAMBSCH PM, 1994, BIOMETRIKA, V81, P515
[8]  
GREENHALGH RM, 1995, EUR J VASC ENDOVASC, V9, P42
[9]   Endovascular aneurysm repair versus open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1): randomised controlled trial [J].
Greenhalgh, RM ;
Brown, LC ;
Epstein, D ;
Kwong, GPS ;
Powell, JT ;
Sculpher, MJ ;
Thompson, SG .
LANCET, 2005, 365 (9478) :2179-2186
[10]   Comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair with open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1), 30-day operative mortality results: randomised controlled trial [J].
Greenhalgh, RM ;
Brown, LC ;
Kwong, GPS ;
Powell, JT ;
Thompson, SG .
LANCET, 2004, 364 (9437) :843-848