Evaluating the Optimal Capacity for the Implementation of Fluidized Catalytic Cracking in the Refinery by the Technical and Economic Analysis

被引:5
作者
Aregawi, B. H. [1 ,2 ]
Atiku, F. A. [3 ]
Pirouzfar, V [4 ]
Su, C-H [1 ]
Wang, F-M [2 ]
机构
[1] Ming Chi Univ Technol, Dept Chem Engn, New Taipei 243303, Taiwan
[2] Natl Taiwan Univ Sci & Technol, Grad Inst Appl Sci & Technol, Taipei 106335, Taiwan
[3] Univ Leeds, Sch Chem & Proc Engn, Energy Res Inst, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[4] Islamic Azad Univ, Dept Chem Engn, Cent Tehran Branch, Tehran 146768683, Iran
关键词
catalytic cracking; fluidized bed; technical and economic analysis; optimum capacity; RISER SIMULATOR; GAS OIL; PERFORMANCE; CONVERSION; OPTIMIZATION; SELECTIVITY; PARAMETERS; MEMBRANE;
D O I
10.1134/S096554412107001X
中图分类号
O62 [有机化学];
学科分类号
070303 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Fluidized catalytic cracking (FCC) unit has vital role in the process of modern refineries because this unit is used for production of valuable refinery products. The aim of this research is to study different capacities of the feedstock in FCC unit and to find the maximum available capacity with consideration of technical and economic criteria. In this regard, process simulation of this unit is performed in the Aspen HYSYS software. Next, this process simulation is imported to Aspen Capital Cost Estimator (or ICARUS) for operating cost (OPEX) and capital cost (CAPEX) evaluations. Finally, it is tried to optimize the capacity of fluidized bed catalytic cracking process. By investigating the results, it was revealed that the breakeven point (BEP) in this unit is in the capacity of 30 000 barrels per day. It means that total cost (operating and capital costs) and net profit (revenue of products) are equal and at the higher capacities than this BEP, FCC unit has profitability. Based on the economic analysis, it could be found that CAPEX and OPEX in the BEP capacity will be more than 156 618 948 $ and 37 432 199 $/yr, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:729 / 738
页数:10
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Activity and selectivity of fluidized catalytic cracking catalysts in a riser simulator: The role of Y-zeolite crystal size [J].
Al-Khattaf, S ;
de Lasa, H .
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 1999, 38 (04) :1350-1356
[2]   The influence of Y-zeolite unit cell size on the performance of FCC catalysts during gas oil catalytic cracking [J].
Al-Khattaf, S .
APPLIED CATALYSIS A-GENERAL, 2002, 231 (1-2) :293-306
[3]   Catalytic cracking of cumene in a riser simulator: A catalyst activity decay model [J].
Al-Khattaf, S ;
de Lasa, H .
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2001, 40 (23) :5398-5404
[4]   Diffusion and reactivity of gas oil in FCC catalysts [J].
Al-Khattaf, S ;
de Lasa, HI .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2001, 79 (03) :341-348
[5]   Modelling and control of a riser type fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) unit [J].
Ali, H ;
Rohani, S ;
Corriou, JP .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN, 1997, 75 (A4) :401-412
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1993, FLUID CATALYTIC CRAC
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2012, US DOWNSTR PROC FRES
[8]  
Bertolacini, 1989, S SERIES AM CHEM SOC, V411
[9]  
Blazek J.J, 1981, HYDROCARB PROCESS, V63, P2
[10]   Deactivation of FCC catalysts [J].
Cerqueira, H. S. ;
Caeiro, G. ;
Costa, L. ;
Ribeiro, F. Ramoa .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR CATALYSIS A-CHEMICAL, 2008, 292 (1-2) :1-13