Multi-criteria decision support system with negotiation process for vehicle technology selection

被引:6
作者
Al-Alawi, Baha M. [1 ]
Coker, Alexander D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Res & Dev Ctr R&DC, Fuel Technol Div, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Vehicle technology; Transportation planning; Transportation modeling; Decision making; Negotiation process; ELECTRIC VEHICLE; PROMETHEE METHOD; ENERGY-SYSTEMS; TOOL; IMPLEMENTATION; RANKING; DESIGN; HYBRID; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2018.05.142
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Decision Makers (DMs) in vehicle technology transportation planning, seek to understand the impact of a given technology on energy use and GHG emissions. There are decision making processes to evaluate technology solutions to meet policy maker requirements, others that evaluate technologies to satisfy consumer requirements, and others that evaluate technologies that provide the automaker with a profit. However, there does not appear to be a decision making process that incorporates all such evaluations into one model. The ideal process should incorporate economic evaluation, market diffusion and government regulations. The aim of this paper is to try and help get closer to such an ideal process, by developing an interactive Decision Support System (DSS), that incorporates as much pertinent information and modeling results published in the available literature as possible. The DSS will have all DM inputs incorporated and generate a ranking of technologies and/or scenario alternatives. The generated results will initiate a negotiation process that will help DMs understand the tradeoffs between different key parameters. Thus, the tool will enable a qualitative and quantitative comparison that provides important information to DMs, to systematically define preferred vehicle design and/or technology scenario to meet the requirements of policy, society, industry and consumers. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:278 / 296
页数:19
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   Analysis of corporate average fuel economy regulation compliance scenarios inclusive of plug in hybrid vehicles [J].
Al-Alawi, Baha M. ;
Bradley, Thomas H. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2014, 113 :1323-1337
[2]   Review of hybrid, plug-in hybrid, and electric vehicle market modeling Studies [J].
Al-Alawi, Baha M. ;
Bradley, Thomas H. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2013, 21 :190-203
[3]   Total cost of ownership, payback, and consumer preference modeling of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles [J].
Al-Alawi, Baha M. ;
Bradley, Thomas H. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2013, 103 :488-506
[4]  
Al-Alawi BM, 2012, TECHNOECONOMIC ANAL
[5]  
[Anonymous], ADV BATT EL DRIV VEH
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1973, MULTIPLE CRITERIA DE
[7]  
[Anonymous], FIN REG IMP AN CORP
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2017 2025 MOD YEAR L
[9]   A critical analysis of decision support systems research [J].
Arnott, D ;
Pervan, G .
JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 20 (02) :67-87
[10]  
Baker D., 2002, GUIDEBOOK DECISION M