Bayesian bivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic test studies with interpretable priors

被引:32
|
作者
Guo, Jingyi [1 ]
Riebler, Andrea [1 ]
Rue, Havard [1 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Math Sci, PO-7491 Trondheim, Norway
关键词
bivariate random effects model; diagnostic meta-analysis; integrated nested Laplace approximation (INLA); penalised complexity priors; prior distributions; MULTIVARIATE METAANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; TEST ACCURACY; MODEL; DISTRIBUTIONS; SPECIFICITY;
D O I
10.1002/sim.7313
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
In a bivariate meta-analysis, the number of diagnostic studies involved is often very low so that frequentist methods may result in problems. Using Bayesian inference is particularly attractive as informative priors that add a small amount of information can stabilise the analysis without overwhelming the data. However, Bayesian analysis is often computationally demanding and the selection of the prior for the covariance matrix of the bivariate structure is crucial with little data. The integrated nested Laplace approximations method provides an efficient solution to the computational issues by avoiding any sampling, but the important question of priors remain. We explore the penalised complexity (PC) prior framework for specifying informative priors for the variance parameters and the correlation parameter. PC priors facilitate model interpretation and hyperparameter specification as expert knowledge can be incorporated intuitively. We conduct a simulation study to compare the properties and behaviour of differently defined PC priors to currently used priors in the field. The simulation study shows that the PC prior seems beneficial for the variance parameters. The use of PC priors for the correlation parameter results in more precise estimates when specified in a sensible neighbourhood around the truth. To investigate the usage of PC priors in practice, we reanalyse a meta-analysis using the telomerase marker for the diagnosis of bladder cancer and compare the results with those obtained by other commonly used modelling approaches. Copyright (c) 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:3039 / 3058
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Improved confidence regions in meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy
    Ito, Tsubasa
    Sugasawa, Shonosuke
    COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 2021, 153
  • [22] A Bayesian multivariate meta-analysis of prevalence data
    Siegel, Lianne
    Rudser, Kyle
    Sutcliffe, Siobhan
    Markland, Alayne
    Brubaker, Linda
    Gahagan, Sheila
    Stapleton, Ann E.
    Chu, Haitao
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2020, 39 (23) : 3105 - 3119
  • [23] Bayesian multivariate meta-analysis of multiple factors
    Lin, Lifeng
    Chu, Haitao
    RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2018, 9 (02) : 261 - 272
  • [24] A composite likelihood method for bivariate meta-analysis in diagnostic systematic reviews
    Chen, Yong
    Liu, Yulun
    Ning, Jing
    Nie, Lei
    Zhu, Hongjian
    Chu, Haitao
    STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2017, 26 (02) : 914 - 930
  • [25] A SIMEX approach for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies with attention to ROC curves
    Guolo, Annamaria
    Cabrera, Tania Erika Pesantez
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOSTATISTICS, 2023, 19 (02): : 455 - 471
  • [26] Using meta-analysis to inform the design of subsequent studies of diagnostic test accuracy
    Hinchliffe, Sally R.
    Crowther, Michael J.
    Phillips, Robert S.
    Sutton, Alex J.
    RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2013, 4 (02) : 156 - 168
  • [27] Point-of-Care Tests for Preeclampsia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies
    Elbarbary, Nouran
    Pritsini, Filippa
    Kazi, Ayisha
    Wang, Chao
    Thilaganathan, Baskaran
    Bhide, Amarnath
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2025, 132 (04) : 414 - 425
  • [28] Joint meta-analysis of two diagnostic tests accounting for within and between studies dependence
    Nikoloulopoulos, Aristidis K.
    STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2024, 33 (10) : 1800 - 1817
  • [29] Nonparametric meta-analysis for diagnostic accuracy studies
    Zapf, Antonia
    Hoyer, Annika
    Kramer, Katharina
    Kuss, Oliver
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2015, 34 (29) : 3831 - 3841
  • [30] Meta-analysis of diagnostic test studies using individual patient data and aggregate data
    Riley, Richard D.
    Dodd, Susanna R.
    Craig, Jean V.
    Thompson, John R.
    Williamson, Paula R.
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2008, 27 (29) : 6111 - 6136