Postoperative management after loop ileostomy closure: are we keeping patients in hospital too long?

被引:31
作者
Baraza, W. [2 ]
Wild, J. [1 ]
Barber, W. [1 ]
Brown, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] No Gen Hosp, Dept Colorectal Surg, Sheffield S5 7AU, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Sheffield, Dept Surg & Anaesthet Sci, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
关键词
Loop ileostomy reversal; Day-case surgery; Length of stay; SURGERY; SAFE;
D O I
10.1308/003588410X12518836439209
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
INTRODUCTION Recent studies have shown that closure of loop ileostomy can be performed in the day-case setting, reducing the length and cost of hospitalisation. By analysing our patients who have undergone reversal, we aimed to determine the length of hospital stay and potential factors behind stays beyond 24 h. PATIENTS AND METHODS A database of patients undergoing closure of loop ileostomy at one colorectal unit was examined. The times taken to discharge, morbidity and re-admission rates were recorded. RESULTS Eighty patients underwent reversal of ileostomy between January 2001 and January 2006. Median age was 63 years (range, 22-81 years). The median length of stay was 4 days (range, 2-32 days). The median length of stay in patients without complications was 4 days. Many appeared able to be discharged earlier. Seventy-two patients (90%) were able to tolerate a solid diet within 48 h and 54 (67.5%) had bowel function within 3 days. Six patients went home before bowel function; none of these were re-admitted. Twenty patients (25%) developed complications, which included wound infection (8%), small bowel obstruction/ileus (6%), enterocutaneous fistula (1%), anastomotic leak (1%), and late abdominal wall abscess (1%). Of the patients, 16% stayed longer than 5 days despite having no postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS The majority of patients undergoing loop ileostomy reversal at our institution can be discharged earlier than they are at present. Support in the community and the implementation of modified UK day-case surgery protocols are suggested to help shorten patients' length of stay.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 55
页数:5
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
Amin SN, 2001, ANN ROY COLL SURG, V83, P246
[2]   The outcome of loop ileostomy closure: a prospective study [J].
Balfour, L ;
Stojkovic, S ;
Boyle, K ;
Finan, P ;
Burke, D ;
Sagar, P .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2002, 89 :11-11
[3]  
*BRIT ASS DAY SURG, GUID DISCH PROC ASS
[4]   Selective serotonin 5-HT3 receptor antagonists for postoperative nausea and vomiting -: Are they all the same? [J].
Gan, TJ .
CNS DRUGS, 2005, 19 (03) :225-238
[5]   Short-term outcome of loop ileostomy closure under local anesthesia: Results of a feasibility study [J].
Haagmans, MJ ;
Brinkert, W ;
Bleichrodt, RP ;
van Goor, H ;
Bremers, AJ .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2004, 47 (11) :1930-1933
[6]   Stapled versus sutured closure of loop ileostomy - A randomized controlled trial [J].
Hasegawa, H ;
Radley, S ;
Morton, DG ;
Keighley, MRB .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2000, 231 (02) :202-204
[7]   Comparison of handsewn with stapled loop ileostomy closures [J].
Hull, TL ;
Kobe, I ;
Fazio, VW .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1996, 39 (10) :1086-1089
[8]  
IHEDIOHA SM, 2004, COLORECTAL DIS S1, V6, P37
[9]   Loop ileostomy closure at an ambulatory surgery facility - A safe and cost-effective alternative to routine hospitalization [J].
Kalady, MF ;
Fields, RC ;
Klein, S ;
Nielson, KC ;
Mantyh, CR ;
Ludwig, KA .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2003, 46 (04) :486-490
[10]   Wound infection after ileostomy closure: A prospective randomized study comparing primary vs. delayed primary closure techniques [J].
Lahat G. ;
Tulchinsky H. ;
Goldman G. ;
Klauzner J.M. ;
Rabau M. .
Techniques in Coloproctology, 2005, 9 (3) :206-208