Validation of the Kihon Checklist and the frailty screening index for frailty defined by the phenotype model in older Japanese adults

被引:35
作者
Watanabe, Daiki [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Yoshida, Tsukasa [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Watanabe, Yuya [2 ,3 ,5 ]
Yamada, Yosuke [2 ,3 ]
Miyachi, Motohiko [1 ,2 ]
Kimura, Misaka [3 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Waseda Univ, Fac Sport Sci, 2-579-15 Mikajima, Saitama 3591192, Japan
[2] Natl Inst Biomed Innovat Hlth & Nutr, Natl Inst Hlth & Nutr, Njuku Ku, 1-23-1 Toyama, Tokyo 1628636, Japan
[3] Kyoto Univ Adv Sci, Inst Act Hlth, Inst Interdisciplinary Res, 1-1 Nanjo Otani,Sogabe Cho, Kameoka City, Kyoto 6218555, Japan
[4] Kameoka City Govt, Senior Citizens Welf Sect, 8 Nonogami, Kameoka City, Kyoto 6218501, Japan
[5] Meiji Yasuda Life Fdn Hlth & Welf, Phys Fitness Res Inst, 150 Tobukimachi, Hachioji, Tokyo 1920001, Japan
[6] Doshisha Womens Coll Liberal Arts, Dept Nursing, 97-1 Minamihokotate, Kyotanabe, Kyoto 6100395, Japan
[7] Kyoto Prefectural Univ Med, Lab Appl Hlth Sci, Kamigyo Ku, 465 Kajii Cho, Kyoto 6028566, Japan
关键词
Frailty; Accuracy; Screening tool; Validation; Phenotype model; CARDIOVASCULAR HEALTH; CLINICAL-PRACTICE; ACCUMULATION; INSTRUMENTS; PREVALENCE; VERSION;
D O I
10.1186/s12877-022-03177-2
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Background The term "frailty" might appear simple, but the methods used to assess it differ among studies. Consequently, there is inconsistency in the classification of frailty and predictive capacity depending on the frailty assessment method utilised. We aimed to examine the diagnostic accuracy of several screening tools for frailty defined by the phenotype model in older Japanese adults. Methods This cross-sectional study included 1,306 older Japanese adults aged >= 65 years who underwent physical check-up by cluster random sampling as part of the Kyoto-Kameoka Study in Japan. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of several screening instruments for frailty using the revised Japanese version of the Cardiovascular Health Study criteria as the reference standard. These criteria are based on the Fried phenotype model and include five elements: unintentional weight loss, weakness (grip strength), exhaustion, slowness (normal gait speed), and low physical activity. The Kihon Checklist (KCL), frailty screening index (FSI), and self-reported health were evaluated using mailed surveys. We calculated the non-parametric area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC ROC) for several screening tools against the reference standard. Results The participants' mean (standard deviation) age was 72.8 (5.5) years. The prevalence of frailty based on the Fried phenotype model was 12.2% in women and 10.3% in men. The AUC ROC was 0.861 (95% confidence interval: 0.832-0.889) for KCL, 0.860 (0.831-0.889) for FSI, and 0.668 (0.629-0.707) for self-reported health. The cut-off for identifying frail individuals was >= 7 points in the KCL and >= 2 points in the FSI. Conclusions Our results indicated that the two instruments (KCL and FSI) had sufficient diagnostic accuracy for frailty based on the phenotype model for older Japanese adults. This may be useful for the early detection of frailty in high-risk older adults.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Validation of the Kihon Checklist and the frailty screening index for frailty defined by the phenotype model in older Japanese adults
    Daiki Watanabe
    Tsukasa Yoshida
    Yuya Watanabe
    Yosuke Yamada
    Motohiko Miyachi
    Misaka Kimura
    BMC Geriatrics, 22
  • [2] Validation and translation of the Kihon Checklist (frailty index) into Brazilian Portuguese
    Sampaio, Priscila Yukari Sewo
    Sampaio, Ricardo Aurelio Carvalho
    Yamada, Minoru
    Ogita, Mihoko
    Arai, Hidenori
    GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 14 (03) : 561 - 569
  • [3] Validity of the Kihon Checklist for evaluating frailty status in Turkish older adults
    Esenkaya, Mehmet Erdinc
    Dokuzlar, Ozge
    Soysal, Pinar
    Smith, Lee
    Jackson, Sarah E.
    Isik, Ahmet Turan
    GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 19 (07) : 616 - 621
  • [4] Are the Kihon Checklist and the Kaigo-Yobo Checklist Compatible With the Frailty Index?
    Kojima, Gotaro
    Taniguchi, Yu
    Kitamura, Akihiko
    Shinkai, Shoji
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION, 2018, 19 (09) : 797 - +
  • [5] Associations between apathy and comprehensive frailty as assessed by the Kihon Checklist among community-dwelling Japanese older adults
    Maruta, Michio
    Shimokihara, Suguru
    Makizako, Hyuma
    Ikeda, Yuriko
    Han, Gwanghee
    Akasaki, Yoshihiko
    Hidaka, Yuma
    Kamasaki, Taishiro
    Kubozono, Takuro
    Ohishi, Mitsuru
    Tabira, Takayuki
    PSYCHOGERIATRICS, 2022, 22 (05) : 651 - 658
  • [6] Current Situation of Frailty Screening Tools for Older Adults
    Ma, L.
    JOURNAL OF NUTRITION HEALTH & AGING, 2019, 23 (01) : 111 - 118
  • [7] Association of altitude and frailty in Chinese older adults: using a cumulative frailty index model
    Dong, Yongfei
    Ma, Hongmei
    Sun, Hao
    Li, Yuemei
    Li, Xiaofang
    Pan, Shiqin
    Li, Caixia
    Liu, Songbai
    Tang, Zaixiang
    Li, Lirong
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 12
  • [8] Association of Frailty Assessed by the Kihon Checklist Upon the Readmission of Older Patients With Heart Failure
    Tsurumoto, Kazuhisa
    Kamisaka, Kenta
    Nakane, Eisaku
    Inoko, Moriaki
    Uemura, Kazuki
    CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2025, 89 (04) : 457 - 462
  • [9] Kihon Checklist to assess frailty in older adults: Some evidence on the internal consistency and validity of the Spanish version
    Sentandreu-Mano, Trinidad
    Cezon-Serrano, Natalia
    Iranzo, Maria Angels Cebria i
    Tortosa-Chulia, Maria A.
    Tomas, Jose M.
    Salom Terradez, Jose Ricardo
    Balasch-Bernat, Merce
    GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 21 (02) : 262 - 267
  • [10] Frailty prevalence using Frailty Index, associated factors and level of agreement among frailty tools in a cohort of Japanese older adults
    Martins, Beatriz Arakawa
    Visvanathan, Renuka
    Barrie, Helen
    Huang, Chi Hsien
    Matsushita, Eiji
    Okada, Kiwako
    Satake, Shosuke
    Uno, Chiharu
    Kuzuya, Masafumi
    ARCHIVES OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS, 2019, 84