The structure of innate vocalizations in Foxp2-deficient mouse pups

被引:73
作者
Gaub, S. [1 ]
Groszer, M. [2 ,3 ]
Fisher, S. E. [2 ]
Ehret, G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulm, Inst Neurobiol, D-89069 Ulm, Germany
[2] Univ Oxford, Wellcome Trust Ctr Human Genet, Oxford, England
[3] INSERM, U839, Inst Fer Moulin, Paris, France
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
Acoustical communication; Foxp2; mutation; instinctive vocalizing; motor control; mouse calls; speech disorder; vocalization deficits; MICE MUS-MUSCULUS; LANGUAGE DISORDER; DEVELOPMENTAL INFLUENCES; ULTRASONIC VOCALIZATION; GENETIC-ANALYSIS; HUMAN SPEECH; FOXP2; CALLS; PATTERNS; DEFICITS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1601-183X.2010.00570.x
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Heterozygous mutations of the human FOXP2 gene are implicated in a severe speech and language disorder. Aetiological mutations of murine Foxp2 yield abnormal synaptic plasticity and impaired motor-skill learning in mutant mice, while knockdown of the avian orthologue in songbirds interferes with auditory-guided vocal learning. Here, we investigate influences of two distinct Foxp2 point mutations on vocalizations of 4-day-old mouse pups (Mus musculus). The R552H missense mutation is identical to that causing speech and language deficits in a large well-studied human family, while the S321X nonsense mutation represents a null allele that does not produce Foxp2 protein. We ask whether vocalizations, based solely on innate mechanisms of production, are affected by these alternative Foxp2 mutations. Sound recordings were taken in two different situations: isolation and distress, eliciting a range of call types, including broadband vocalizations of varying noise content, ultrasonic whistles and clicks. Sound production rates and several acoustic parameters showed that, despite absence of functional Foxp2, homozygous mutants could vocalize all types of sounds in a normal temporal pattern, but only at comparably low intensities. We suggest that altered vocal output of these homozygotes may be secondary to developmental delays and somatic weakness. Heterozygous mutants did not differ from wild-types in any of the measures that we studied (R552H ) or in only a few (S321X ), which were in the range of differences routinely observed for different mouse strains. Thus, Foxp2 is not essential for the innate production of emotional vocalizations with largely normal acoustic properties by mouse pups.
引用
收藏
页码:390 / 401
页数:12
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] ULTRA-SOUNDS IN 3 INBRED STRAINS OF YOUNG MICE
    BELL, RW
    ZACHMAN, TA
    NITSCHKE, W
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL BIOLOGY, 1972, 7 (06): : 805 - &
  • [2] Neonatal behaviors associated with ultrasonic vocalizations in mice (Mus musculus):: A slow-motion analysis
    Branchi, I
    Santucci, D
    Puopolo, M
    Alleva, E
    [J]. DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOBIOLOGY, 2004, 44 (01) : 37 - 44
  • [3] Selective breeding for an infant phenotype: Rat pup ultrasonic vocalization (USV)
    Brunelli, SA
    [J]. BEHAVIOR GENETICS, 2005, 35 (01) : 53 - 65
  • [4] Conservation and Diversity of Foxp2 Expression in Muroid Rodents: Functional Implications
    Campbell, Polly
    Reep, Roger L.
    Stoll, Margaret L.
    Ophir, Alexander G.
    Phelps, Steven M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY, 2009, 512 (01) : 84 - 100
  • [5] AN ANALYSIS OF SINGLE-GENE EFFECTS ON AUDIBLE AND ULTRASONIC VOCALIZATIONS IN THE MOUSE
    DUDINE, B
    ROBINSON, DJ
    OLIVERIO, A
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL AND NEURAL BIOLOGY, 1982, 36 (02): : 197 - 203
  • [6] Recurrent DNA copy number variation in the laboratory mouse
    Egan, Chris M.
    Sridhar, Srinath
    Wigler, Michael
    Hall, Ira M.
    [J]. NATURE GENETICS, 2007, 39 (11) : 1384 - 1389
  • [7] Infant rodent ultrasounds - A gate to the understanding of sound communication
    Ehret, G
    [J]. BEHAVIOR GENETICS, 2005, 35 (01) : 19 - 29
  • [8] EHRET G, 1975, BEHAVIOUR, V52, P38
  • [9] Ehret G, 1976, J Am Audiol Soc, V1, P179
  • [10] The eloquent ape: genes, brains and the evolution of language
    Fisher, SE
    Marcus, GF
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2006, 7 (01) : 9 - 20