Patterns of failure after surgically radical resection for organ-confined prostate cancer

被引:0
作者
Mickisch, GH [1 ]
Kranse, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, AZR, Dept Urol, Afd Urol, NL-3015 GD Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
prostate cancer; surgical margins; progression; prognosis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Some patients from our radical prostatectomy (RPx) series with organ-confined (pT2) prostate cancer and negative surgical margins show a PSA relapse. Our study aims at further analyzing this intriguing cohort of patients that otherwise would have been considered to be cured. Patients and Methods: Since the introduction of PSA in the follow-up after RPx 475 pelvic lymph node dissections (PLND) with subsequent RPx were performed in our department from 1988 to 1997. 227 were classified as pT2, 34 (15%) exhibited positive surgical margins (17 apically, 16 laterally, 1 both) and 4 others were excluded due to a short follow-up (<1 month). From the remaining 189 (study cohort), 19 (10%) developed a biochemical progression, defined as a minimum of two consecutive PSA measurements greater than or equal to 0.1 ng/ml. Only in one of them a G3 tumor was present. Median follow-up was 19.7 months. Results: The Kaplan-Meier biochemical progression analysis showed that after 1 year, 2 years and 5 years, 95% (confidence interval [CI] 91-99%), 91% (Cl 86-96%), and 77% (Cl 55-89%) were free of progression, respectively. This means that roughly one fourth of pT2 tumors will become progressive despite negative surgical margins. These 19 patients were subdivided into 4 groups: No. 1: biopsy proven local recurrence (n=2); no. 2: suspected local recurrence defined as slowly rising PSA less than or equal to 2 ng/ml, but negative biopsies (n=12); no. 3: radiologic imaging proven distant metastasis (n=1); no. 4: suspected distant metastasis defined as rapidly rising PSA > 9 ng/ml without direct radiologic evidence (n=4). All patients from groups 3 + 4 had negative bone scans preoperatively and 4/5 had preoperative PSA values < 10 ng/ml. Conclusion: A pathological diagnosis of organ-confined prostata cancer (pT2) and a meticulous analysis of negative surgical margins does not exclude the occurrence of local relapses in 7% (14/189), and there is evidence for suspect haematogenic spread of PC cells in at least 2% (4/189).
引用
收藏
页码:70 / 73
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Tumor Volume Adds Prognostic Value in Patients with Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer
    Kim, Kwang Hyun
    Lim, Sey Kiat
    Shin, Tae-Young
    Kang, Dae Ryong
    Han, Woong Kyu
    Chung, Byung Ha
    Rha, Koon Ho
    Hong, Sung Joon
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 20 (09) : 3133 - 3139
  • [32] Prognostic consequences of the location of positive surgical margins in organ-confined prostate cancer
    Salomon, L
    Anastasiadis, AG
    Antiphon, P
    Levrel, O
    Saint, F
    De La Taille, A
    Cicco, A
    Vordos, D
    Hoznek, A
    Chopin, D
    Abbou, CC
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2003, 70 (04) : 291 - 296
  • [33] Emerging minimally invasive procedures for focal treatment of organ-confined prostate cancer
    Habibian, David J.
    Katz, Aaron E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYPERTHERMIA, 2016, 32 (07) : 795 - 800
  • [34] GREB1 tissue expression is associated with organ-confined prostate cancer
    Antunes, Alberto A.
    Leite, Katia R.
    Reis, Sabrina T.
    Sousa-Canavez, Juliana M.
    Camara-Lopes, Luiz H.
    Dall'Oglio, Marcos F.
    Srougi, Miguel
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2012, 30 (01) : 16 - 20
  • [35] Gangliosides of organ-confined versus metastatic androgen-receptor-negative prostate cancer
    Ravindranath, MH
    Muthugounder, S
    Presser, N
    Selvan, SR
    Portoukalian, J
    Brosman, S
    Morton, DL
    BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2004, 324 (01) : 154 - 165
  • [36] Positive margin length and highest Gleason grade of tumor at the margin predict for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer
    Chapin, Brian F.
    Nguyen, Jenny N.
    Achim, Mary F.
    Navai, Neema
    Williams, Stephen B.
    Prokhorova, Ina N.
    Wang, Xuemei
    Tapia, Elsa M. Li Ning
    Davis, John W.
    Troncoso, Patricia
    PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2018, 21 (02) : 221 - 227
  • [37] In Organ-confined Prostate Cancer, Tumor Quantitation Not Found to Aid in Prediction of Biochemical Recurrence
    Ito, Yujiro
    Vertosick, Emily A.
    Sjoberg, Daniel D.
    Vickers, Andrew J.
    Al-Ahmadie, Hikrnat A.
    Chen, Ying-Bei
    Gopalan, Anuradha
    Sirintrapun, Sahussapont J.
    Tickoo, Satish K.
    Eastham, James A.
    Scardino, Peter T.
    Reuter, Victor E.
    Fine, Samson W.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2019, 43 (08) : 1061 - 1065
  • [38] Active surveillance of organ-confined prostate cancer ["Active surveillance" des lokalisierten prostatakarzinoms]
    Czeloth K.
    Albers P.
    Der Onkologe, 2007, 13 (8): : 691 - 700
  • [39] Testosterone Treatment of Men with Unequivocal Hypogonadism Following Treatment of Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer
    Jones Jr, Robert Benson
    Snyder, Peter J.
    ENDOCRINE PRACTICE, 2023, 29 (09) : 723 - 726
  • [40] Role of Radical Prostatectomy in Clinically Non-Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer
    Gratzke, Christian
    Engel, Jutta
    Stief, Christian G.
    CURRENT UROLOGY REPORTS, 2014, 15 (11)