I liked your course because I believe in (the power of) student evaluations of teaching (SET). Students' perceptions of a teaching evaluation process and their relationships with SET scores

被引:26
作者
Spooren, Pieter [1 ]
Christiaens, Wim [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Antwerp, Dept Social Sci, Antwerp, Belgium
关键词
Student evaluation of teaching; Validity; Students' perceptions; Teacher evaluation; Higher education; Structural equation modelling; CONFIRMATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS; TEACHERS; VALIDITY; ENGAGEMENT; WORKLOAD; RATINGS; GRADES; SCHOOL; MODEL; BIAS;
D O I
10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.12.003
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Previous research has shown that many student, teacher, and course characteristics are related to SET scores. However, the relationship between students' perceptions of (the value of) of SET procedures and their SET scores has not yet been studied. At the University of Antwerp (Belgium), 974 students from 6 different academic disciplines completed both a SET form and an adapted version of the Students' Perceptions of a Teaching Evaluation Process Questionnaire (Surrat & Desselle, 2007). Structural equation modelling was used to examine the relationships between students' perceptions of a SET procedure and their SET scores. The analysis revealed a statistically significant positive relationship (0.20) between a latent construct measuring the perceived value of SET and SET scores, as derived from a global factor measuring general teaching competency. Students who valued SET procedures tended to provide higher SET scores. It is important to recognize that based on their conceptions of their role as evaluators of university professors, students might differ in their perceptions of teaching competence. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 49
页数:7
相关论文
共 51 条
[11]   Teachers' perceptions of student evaluations of teaching [J].
Chan, Cecilia K. Y. ;
Luk, Lillian Y. Y. ;
Zeng, Min .
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH AND EVALUATION, 2014, 20 (04) :275-289
[12]  
Dunegan K.J., 2003, Journal of Management Education, V27, P280, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562903027003002, DOI 10.1177/1052562903027003002]
[14]  
Field A., 2013, DISCOVERING STAT USI, V4th ed
[15]   Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments [J].
Floyd, FJ ;
Widaman, KF .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 1995, 7 (03) :286-299
[16]   School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence [J].
Fredricks, JA ;
Blumenfeld, PC ;
Paris, AH .
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2004, 74 (01) :59-109
[17]  
Greimel-Fuhrmann B., 2003, ASSESS EVAL HIGH EDU, V28, P229
[18]  
Hoshower L. B., 2003, ASSESS EVAL HIGH EDU, V28, P71, DOI DOI 10.1080/02602930301683
[19]  
Hox J.J., 2010, MULTILEVEL ANAL TECH, DOI 10.4324/9780203852279
[20]   Student and faculty perceptions of student evaluations of teaching in a Canadian pharmacy school [J].
Iqbal, Isabeau ;
Lee, John D. ;
Pearson, Marion L. ;
Albon, Simon P. .
CURRENTS IN PHARMACY TEACHING AND LEARNING, 2016, 8 (02) :191-199