I liked your course because I believe in (the power of) student evaluations of teaching (SET). Students' perceptions of a teaching evaluation process and their relationships with SET scores

被引:26
作者
Spooren, Pieter [1 ]
Christiaens, Wim [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Antwerp, Dept Social Sci, Antwerp, Belgium
关键词
Student evaluation of teaching; Validity; Students' perceptions; Teacher evaluation; Higher education; Structural equation modelling; CONFIRMATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS; TEACHERS; VALIDITY; ENGAGEMENT; WORKLOAD; RATINGS; GRADES; SCHOOL; MODEL; BIAS;
D O I
10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.12.003
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Previous research has shown that many student, teacher, and course characteristics are related to SET scores. However, the relationship between students' perceptions of (the value of) of SET procedures and their SET scores has not yet been studied. At the University of Antwerp (Belgium), 974 students from 6 different academic disciplines completed both a SET form and an adapted version of the Students' Perceptions of a Teaching Evaluation Process Questionnaire (Surrat & Desselle, 2007). Structural equation modelling was used to examine the relationships between students' perceptions of a SET procedure and their SET scores. The analysis revealed a statistically significant positive relationship (0.20) between a latent construct measuring the perceived value of SET and SET scores, as derived from a global factor measuring general teaching competency. Students who valued SET procedures tended to provide higher SET scores. It is important to recognize that based on their conceptions of their role as evaluators of university professors, students might differ in their perceptions of teaching competence. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 49
页数:7
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct [J].
Appleton, James J. ;
Christenson, Sandra L. ;
Furlong, Michael J. .
PSYCHOLOGY IN THE SCHOOLS, 2008, 45 (05) :369-386
[2]  
Ballantyne R., 2000, Assessment Evaluation in Higher Education, V25, P221
[3]  
Barth M. M., 2008, J ED BUSINESS, V84
[4]  
Bentler P. M., 1995, Structural equation modelling: Concepts, issues, and applications, P76
[5]  
Beran T., 2005, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, V30, P593, DOI [10.1080/02602930500260688, DOI 10.1080/02602930500260688]
[6]   Instructors' perspectives on the utility of student ratings of instruction [J].
Beran, Tanya N. ;
Rokosh, Jennifer L. .
INSTRUCTIONAL SCIENCE, 2009, 37 (02) :171-184
[7]   Does the use of end of semester evaluation forms represent teachers' views of teaching in a tertiary education context in Japan? [J].
Burden, Peter .
TEACHING AND TEACHER EDUCATION, 2008, 24 (06) :1463-1475
[8]   Creating confusion or creative evaluation? The use of student evaluation of teaching surveys in Japanese tertiary education [J].
Burden, Peter .
EDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT EVALUATION AND ACCOUNTABILITY, 2010, 22 (02) :97-117
[9]   Will teachers receive higher student evaluations by giving higher grades and less course work? [J].
Centra, JA .
RESEARCH IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2003, 44 (05) :495-518
[10]   Is there gender bias in student evaluations of teaching? [J].
Centra, JA ;
Gaubatz, NB .
JOURNAL OF HIGHER EDUCATION, 2000, 71 (01) :17-+