A Rapid Access Chest Pain Clinic (RACPC): Initial Australian Experience

被引:10
|
作者
Yu, Christopher [1 ]
Sheriff, Javed [1 ]
Ng, Austin [1 ,2 ]
Brazete, Susana [1 ]
Gullick, Janice [2 ]
Brieger, David [1 ,2 ]
Kritharides, Leonard [1 ,2 ]
Lowe, Harry C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Concord Repatriat Gen Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
来源
HEART LUNG AND CIRCULATION | 2018年 / 27卷 / 11期
关键词
MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; EMERGENCY-DEPARTMENT; TROPONIN-T; RISK; DIAGNOSIS; RATES;
D O I
10.1016/j.hlc.2017.11.006
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Chest pain is the second most common presenting symptom to emergency departments (ED) in Australia, although up to 85% of these patients do not have an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Cardiologist-led rapid access chest pain clinics (RACPC) have been proposed overseas to assist in the management of such patients, with prompt outpatient assessment if patients are deemed low risk and discharged from the ED. The use of RACPCs in Australia has been only recently proposed; we therefore sought to examine one such RACPC in an Australian context. Methods and Results 1133 consecutive patients were seen at a metropolitan RACPC, between August 2008 and February 2017. There was a high preponderance of cardiovascular risk factors. Exercise stress testing (EST) was the default investigation upon discharge from ED, with a total of 1038 ESTs performed in 1113 patients (93%), with low numbers of other functional tests, and a small, but increasing number of coronary computed tomography (CT) scans performed over this period. Eighteen patients subsequently underwent revascularisation (1.6% of the total cohort), and none of these patients were readmitted at any time with an ACS between the interval of their index ED presentation to these investigations or treatments. Five (0.4%) patients represented to ED within 48 hours, none due to a cardiovascular cause. A total of 24 (2.1%) patients represented between 2 and 28 days, with none of these due to an ACS. Conclusions Following ED assessment of acute chest pain as low risk-with direct ED referral for exercising testing followed by RACPC review-results in very low readmission rates at 48 hours and at 28 days. Moreover, these readmissions were almost always not of cardiovascular aetiology, and occurred despite relatively longer waiting periods for both EST (8 days) and between EST and RACPC review (11 days), than the prespecified 72 to 96 hours as defined by the clinic protocol. Further investigation into this model of care in Australia is suggested.
引用
收藏
页码:1376 / 1380
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Telehealth Rapid Access Chest Pain Clinic: Initial Experience During COVID-19 Pandemic
    Black, James A.
    Lees, Conor
    Chapman, Niamh
    Kelleher, Liam
    Campbell, Julie A.
    Otahal, Petr
    Cheng, Kevin
    Marwick, Thomas H.
    Sharman, James E.
    TELEMEDICINE AND E-HEALTH, 2023, 29 (10) : 1476 - 1483
  • [2] Initial experience with a rapid access blackouts triage clinic
    Petkar, S.
    Bell, W.
    Rice, N.
    Iddon, P.
    Cooper, P.
    McKee, D.
    Curtis, N.
    Hanley, M.
    Stuart, J.
    Jones, K. Mackway
    Fitzpatrick, A. P.
    CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2011, 11 (01) : 11 - 16
  • [3] Evaluation of health-related quality of life changes in an Australian rapid access chest pain clinic
    Black, J. Andrew
    Sharman, James E.
    Chen, Gang
    Palmer, Andrew J.
    de Graaff, Barbara
    Nelson, Mark
    Chapman, Niamh
    Campbell, Julie A.
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [4] The rapid access chest pain clinic: unmet distress and disability
    Marks, E. M.
    Chambers, J. B.
    Russell, V.
    Bryan, L.
    Hunter, M. S.
    QJM-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2014, 107 (06) : 429 - 434
  • [5] Non-cardiac chest pain: time to extend the rapid access chest pain clinic?
    Chambers, J. B.
    Marks, E.
    Knisley, L.
    Hunter, M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2013, 67 (04) : 303 - 306
  • [6] Long-Term Outcomes Following Rapid Access Chest Pain Clinic Assessment: First Australian Data
    Yu, Chris
    Brazete, Susana
    Gullick, Janice
    Garcia, M. Tessa
    Brieger, David
    Kritharides, Leonard
    Naoum, Chris
    Ng, Austin C. C.
    Lowe, Harry C.
    HEART LUNG AND CIRCULATION, 2021, 30 (09): : 1309 - 1313
  • [7] Impact of a rapid access chest pain clinic in Singapore to improve evaluation of new-onset chest pain
    Toh, Lay Cheng
    Khoo, Christina
    Goh, Cheng Huang
    Choa, Gary
    Quek, Lit Sin
    Phang, Jonathan
    Wong, Franco
    Tsou, Keith
    Kwan, Yew Seng
    Kojodjojo, Pipin
    POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2023, 99 (1171) : 500 - 505
  • [8] Clinical outcomes when applying NICE guidance for the investigation of recent-onset chest pain to a rapid-access chest pain clinic population
    Patterson, Caroline Marie
    Nair, Arjun
    Ahmed, Nabeel
    Bryan, Leoni
    Bell, Derek
    Nicol, Edward David
    HEART, 2015, 101 (02) : 113 - 118
  • [9] Clinical outcomes of patients discharged from the Rapid Access Chest Pain Clinic with non-anginal chest pain: A retrospective cohort study
    Kite, T. A.
    Gaunt, H.
    Banning, A. S.
    Roberts, E.
    Kovac, J.
    Hudson, I.
    Gershlick, A. H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 302 : 1 - 4
  • [10] Clinical effectiveness of a sonographer-led, cardiologist-interpreted stress echocardiography service in the rapid access stable chest pain clinic
    Hampson, Reinette
    Vamvakidou, Anastasia
    Kinsey, Christopher
    Singh, Bablu
    Senior, Roxy
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 281 : 107 - 112