Bifidobacterium breve M-16V as a Probiotic for Preterm Infants: A Strain-Specific Systematic Review

被引:18
作者
Athalye-Jape, Gayatri [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Rao, Shripada [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Simmer, Karen [1 ,3 ]
Patole, Sanjay [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] King Edward Mem Hosp, Dept Neonatal Paediat, Perth, WA, Australia
[2] Princess Margaret Hosp Children, Dept Neonatal Paediat, Perth, WA, Australia
[3] Univ Western Australia, Sch Paediat & Child Hlth, Ctr Neonatal Res & Educ, Perth, WA, Australia
关键词
Bifidobacterium breve; meta-analysis; necrotizing enterocolitis; preterm infants; systematic review; PREVENTING NECROTIZING ENTEROCOLITIS; METAANALYSIS; SUPPLEMENTATION; EXPRESSION; SEPSIS; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1177/0148607117722749
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Introduction: Bifidobacterium breve M-16V has been used as a probiotic in preterminfants. Probiotic strain-specific data are essential to guide clinical practice. Objective: To assess effects of B breve M-16V in preterm neonates. Design: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs of B breve M-16V in preterm infants was conducted. Multiple databases, proceedings of Pediatric Academy Society, and other relevant conferences were searched in September 2016 and on January 5, 2017. Results: Five RCTs (n = 482) and 4 non-RCTs (n = 2496) were included. Of the 5 RCTs, 4 carried high/unclear risk of bias in many domains. Meta-analysis (fixed effects model) of RCTs showed no significant benefits on stage >= 2 necrotizing enterocolitis, late-onset sepsis, mortality, and postnatal age at full feeds. Meta-analysis of non-RCTs showed significant benefits on (1) late-onset sepsis-3 studies (n = 2452), odds ratio = 0.56 (95% CI, 0.45-0.71), P < .0001; (2) mortality-2 studies (n = 2319), odds ratio = 0.61 (95% CI, 0.44-0.84), P = .002; and (3) postnatal age at full feeds (days)-2 studies (n = 361), mean difference, -2.42 (95% CI, -2.55 to -2.3), P < .00001. There were no adverse effects from B breve M-16V. On Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation analysis, the overall quality of evidence was deemed very low. Conclusions: Current evidence is limited regarding the potential of B breve M-16V in preterm neonates. Adequately powered, preferably cluster RCTs are needed to confirm these findings.
引用
收藏
页码:677 / 688
页数:12
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Safety evaluation of probiotic bifidobacteria by analysis of mucin degradation activity and translocation ability [J].
Abe, Fumiaki ;
Muto, Masamichi ;
Yaeshima, Tomoko ;
Iwatsuki, Keiji ;
Aihara, Hiroaki ;
Ohashi, Yuji ;
Fujisawa, Tomohiko .
ANAEROBE, 2010, 16 (02) :131-136
[2]   Probiotics and Time to Achieve Full Enteral Feeding in Human Milk-Fed and Formula-Fed Preterm Infants: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Aceti, Arianna ;
Gori, Davide ;
Barone, Giovanni ;
Callegari, Maria Luisa ;
Fantini, Maria Pia ;
Indrio, Flavia ;
Maggio, Luca ;
Meneghin, Fabio ;
Morelli, Lorenzo ;
Zuccotti, Gianvincenzo ;
Corvaglia, Luigi .
NUTRIENTS, 2016, 8 (08)
[3]   Probiotics for prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants: systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Aceti, Arianna ;
Gori, Davide ;
Barone, Giovanni ;
Callegari, Maria Luisa ;
Di Mauro, Antonio ;
Fantini, Maria Pia ;
Indrio, Flavia ;
Maggio, Luca ;
Meneghin, Fabio ;
Morelli, Lorenzo ;
Zuccotti, Gianvincenzo ;
Corvaglia, Luigi .
ITALIAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2015, 41
[4]  
Akiyama K., 1994, Acta Neonatol Jpn, V30, P257
[5]   Probiotics for prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants [J].
AlFaleh, Khalid ;
Anabrees, Jasim .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2014, (04)
[6]  
[Anonymous], J JAPAN SOC PERINATA
[7]  
[Anonymous], ENEONATAL REV
[8]  
[Anonymous], COCHRANE HDB SYSTEMA
[9]  
[Anonymous], CRDS GUID UND REV HL
[10]   Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 as a Probiotic for Preterm Neonates: A Strain-Specific Systematic Review [J].
Athalye-Jape, Gayatri ;
Rao, Shripada ;
Patole, Sanjay .
JOURNAL OF PARENTERAL AND ENTERAL NUTRITION, 2016, 40 (06) :783-794