Chimpanzees overcome the tragedy of the commons with dominance

被引:5
作者
Koomen, Rebecca [1 ]
Herrmann, Esther [1 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Evolutionary Anthropol, Leipzig, Germany
关键词
RED COLOBUS POPULATION; PAN-TROGLODYTES; DELAY; COMMUNICATION; GRATIFICATION; INSTITUTIONS; COOPERATION; PREDATION; RESOURCE; DILEMMAS;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-018-28416-8
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Competition over common-pool resources (CPR) is a ubiquitous challenge for social animals. Many species face similar dilemmas, yet our understanding of the evolutionary trajectory of CPR social strategies remains unexplored. Here, we provide a first look at the social strategies of our closest living relatives, chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), in two novel resource dilemma experiments. Dyads of chimpanzees were presented with renewable resource systems, collapsible at a quantity-dependent threshold. Dyads had to continuously resist overconsumption to maximize collective gains. In study 1, dyads of chimpanzees sustained a renewing juice source. Inequality of juice acquisition between partners predicted sustaining success, indicating that one individual dominated the task while the partner inhibited. Dyads in study 2 fed together on accumulating carrot pieces but could end the accumulation any time by grabbing an immediate selfish source of carrots. Dyads with low tolerance were more successful at collectively sustaining the resource than highly tolerant dyads. Further, the dominant individual was more likely to cause collapse in dyads with low tolerance than dyads with high tolerance. These results indicate that chimpanzees use a dominance-based monopolisation strategy moderated by social tolerance to overcome the tragedy of the commons.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Common property institutions and sustainable governance of resources [J].
Agrawal, A .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2001, 29 (10) :1649-1672
[2]  
Alvard M., 1995, Oryx, V29, P58, DOI 10.1017/S0030605300020883
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, The chimpanzees of Tai Forest: Behavioural ecology and evolution
[4]  
Baayen R. H., 2008, ANAL LINGUISTIC DATA, DOI [DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511801686, 10.1017/CBO9780511801686]
[5]   Maintenance of delay of gratification by four chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes):: The effects of delayed reward visibility, experimenter presence, and extended delay intervals [J].
Beran, Michael J. ;
Evans, Theodore A. .
BEHAVIOURAL PROCESSES, 2006, 73 (03) :315-324
[6]   Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) can wait, when they choose to: a study with the hybrid delay task [J].
Beran, Michael J. ;
Evans, Theodore A. ;
Paglieri, Fabio ;
McIntyre, Joseph M. ;
Addessi, Elsa ;
Hopkins, William D. .
ANIMAL COGNITION, 2014, 17 (02) :197-205
[7]  
Beran MJ, 1999, DEV PSYCHOBIOL, V34, P119, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2302(199903)34:2<119::AID-DEV5>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-P
[9]   Summation and numerousness judgments of sequentially presented sets of items by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) [J].
Beran, MJ .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 115 (02) :181-191
[10]   Fairness in Non-human Primates? [J].
Braeuer, Juliane ;
Hanus, Daniel .
SOCIAL JUSTICE RESEARCH, 2012, 25 (03) :256-276