Automating Collection of Pain-Related Patient-Reported Outcomes to Enhance Clinical Care and Research

被引:9
|
作者
Owen-Smith, Ashli [1 ,2 ]
Mayhew, Meghan [3 ]
Leo, Michael C. [3 ]
Varga, Alexandra [3 ]
Benes, Lindsay [3 ,4 ]
Bonifay, Allison [3 ]
DeBar, Lynn [5 ]
机构
[1] Georgia State Univ, Div Hlth Management & Policy, Sch Publ Hlth, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
[2] Kaiser Permanente, Ctr Clin & Outcomes Res, Atlanta, GA USA
[3] Kaiser Permanente, Ctr Hlth Res, Portland, OR USA
[4] Univ Portland, Sch Nursing, Portland, OR 97203 USA
[5] Kaiser Permanente, Washington Hlth Res Inst, Seattle, WA USA
关键词
patient-centered outcomes research; chronic pain; clinical trials; primary care; electronic health records; UNITED-STATES; CANCER; INTENSITY; OPIOIDS; RECORD;
D O I
10.1007/s11606-018-4326-9
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Chronic pain is highly prevalent, and the ability to routinely measure patients' pain and treatment response using validated patient-reported outcome (PRO) assessments is important to clinical care. Despite this recognition, systematic use in everyday clinical care is rare. The aims of this study were to (1) describe infrastructure designed to automate PRO data collection, (2) compare study-enhanced PRO completion rates to those in clinical care, and (3) evaluate patient response rates by method of PRO administration and sociodemographic and/or clinical characteristics. The Pain Program for Active Coping and Training (PPACT) is a pragmatic clinical trial conducted within three regions of the Kaiser Permanente health care system. PPACT evaluates the effect of integrative primary care-based pain management services on outcomes for chronic pain patients on long-term opioid treatment. We implemented a tiered process for quarterly assessment of PROs to supplement clinical collection and ensure adequate trial data using three methods: web-based personal health records (PHR), automated interactive voice response (IVR) calls, and live outreach. Among a subset of PPACT participants examined (n = 632), the tiered study-enhanced PRO completion rates were higher than in clinical care: 96% completed ae<yen> 1 study-administered PRO with mean of 3.46 (SD = 0.85) vs. 74% completed in clinical care with a mean of 2.43 (SD = 2.08). Among all PPACT participants at 3 months (n = 831), PRO completion was 86% and analyses of response by key characteristics found only that participant age predicted an increased likelihood of responding to PHR and IVR outreach. Adherence to pain-related PRO data collection using our enhanced tiered approach was high. No demographic or clinical identifiers other than age were associated with differential response by modality. Successful ancillary support should employ multimodal electronic health record functionalities for PRO administration. Using automated modalities is feasible and may facilitate better sustainability for regular PRO administration within health care systems. Clinical Trials Registration Number: NCT02113592.
引用
收藏
页码:S31 / S37
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Automating Collection of Pain-Related Patient-Reported Outcomes to Enhance Clinical Care and Research
    Ashli Owen-Smith
    Meghan Mayhew
    Michael C. Leo
    Alexandra Varga
    Lindsay Benes
    Allison Bonifay
    Lynn DeBar
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2018, 33 : 31 - 37
  • [2] Automating collection of patient reported outcomes to enhance clinical care and research
    Lancaster, L.
    Owen-Smith, A.
    Rowley, A.
    Laws, R.
    Bonifay, A.
    Debar, L.
    JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2016, 17 (04): : S6 - S6
  • [3] Acute Pain Services and pain-related patient-reported outcomes in Hungarian hospitals
    Lovasi, Orsolya
    Gaal, Peter
    Frank, Krisztian
    Lam, Judit
    PERIOPERATIVE MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (01)
  • [4] Acute Pain Services and pain-related patient-reported outcomes in Hungarian hospitals
    Orsolya Lovasi
    Péter Gaál
    Krisztián Frank
    Judit Lám
    Perioperative Medicine, 13
  • [5] Rethinking the definition of chronic postsurgical pain: composites of patient-reported pain-related outcomes vs pain intensities alone
    Hofer, Debora M.
    Lehmann, Thomas
    Zaslansky, Ruth
    Harnik, Michael
    Meissner, Winfried
    Stueber, Frank
    Stamer, Ulrike M.
    PAIN, 2022, 163 (12) : 2457 - 2465
  • [6] Automating Patient-reported Data Collection: Does it Work?
    Bogor, Sayah
    Niknam, Kian
    Less, Justin
    Andaya, Veronica
    Swarup, Ishaan
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, 2024, 44 (06) : 402 - 406
  • [7] Translating Patient-Reported Outcomes From Surgical Research to Clinical Care
    Smith, Angela B.
    Schwarze, Margaret L.
    JAMA SURGERY, 2017, 152 (09) : 811 - 812
  • [8] Patient-Reported Outcomes in Integrative Oncology Bridging Clinical Care With Research
    Lopez, Gabriel
    Lacey, Judith
    Christie, Aimee J.
    Powers-James, Catherine
    Narayanan, Santhosshi
    Liu, Wenli
    Cohen, Lorenzo
    CANCER JOURNAL, 2019, 25 (05): : 311 - 315
  • [9] Patient-Reported Outcomes of Pain and Related Symptoms in Integrative Oncology Practice and Clinical Research: Evidence and Recommendations
    Zhi, W. Iris
    Gentile, Danielle
    Diller, Maggie
    Kinney, Anita
    Bao, Ting
    Master, Viraj
    Wang, Xin Shelley
    ONCOLOGY-NEW YORK, 2021, 35 (01): : 35 - 41
  • [10] Moving toward patient-centered care in the emergency department: Patient-reported expectations, definitions of success, and importance of improvement in pain-related outcomes
    Flynn, Spencer B.
    Gordee, Alexander
    Kuchibhatla, Maragatha
    George, Steven Z.
    Eucker, Stephanie A.
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2021, 28 (11) : 1286 - 1298