Spatiotemporal analysis of ecological vulnerability and management in the Tarim River Basin, China

被引:117
作者
Xue, Lianqing [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Wang, Jing [1 ]
Zhang, Luochen [5 ]
Wei, Guanghui [5 ]
Zhu, Boli [1 ]
机构
[1] Hohai Univ, Coll Hydrol & Water Resources, Nanjing 210098, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Shihezi Univ, Shihezi 832003, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Texas Austin, Jackson Sch Geosci, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[4] Hohai Univ, Wentian Coll, Maonshan 243000, Peoples R China
[5] Tarim River Basin Adm, Korla 841000, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Ecological vulnerability; Spatiotemporal change; Ecological management; Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process; Pressure-State-Response; ECO-ENVIRONMENTAL VULNERABILITY; FUZZY HIERARCHICAL ANALYSIS; NORTHWEST CHINA; RIPARIAN VEGETATION; LOWER REACHES; COVER CHANGE; WATER; GROUNDWATER; STRATEGIES; SCENARIOS;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.321
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Tarim River Basin (TRB) is an extremely arid area in China, suffering from dry climate and intense human activities, which have brought about significant changes in ecological processes and then, led to serious ecological vulnerability (EV). This study proposes an assessment framework to evaluate EV and analyze its dynamic change in the TRB during 2005-2015. An integrated method is developed with the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) and the Pressure-State-Response (PSR) framework, which highlights impacts of nature and anthropogenic interference on the ecology. Specific management strategies are put forward based on the spatial recognition of ecologically vulnerable areas in the TRB. The EV is divided into four vulnerability levels including Light I, Medium II, Heavy III and Very heavy IV. Results show that the average EV is at Heavy III vulnerability level in the TRB in the last 2005-2015, and there has been an increasing trend in EV, which even has come up to the Very heavy IV vulnerability level in the year 2013-2015. As a whole, the EV displays a high-to-low gradient from east to west during the study period. Heavy III and Very heavy IV vulnerability levels, distributed in the East, mainly in the mainstream areas with characterization of frequent human interferences, tend to increase persistently. In contrast, Light I vulnerability level, mainly in the west source areas, shows a significant decline after 2010. Based on the results, some suggestions targeted at different vulnerable areas were proposed to help restore ecological environments by integrating legal managements with public efforts. The proposed methodology, reflecting the nature and human interaction on the EV is of practical use for the ecological restorations in the TRB. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:876 / 888
页数:13
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Vulnerability [J].
Adger, W. Neil .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2006, 16 (03) :268-281
[2]   Eco-morphological response of floodplain forests (Populus euphratica Oliv.) to water diversion in the lower Tarim River, northwest China [J].
Aishan, Tayierjiang ;
Halik, Uemuet ;
Kurban, Alishir ;
Cyffka, Bernd ;
Kuba, Martin ;
Betz, Florian ;
Keyimu, Maierdang .
ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2015, 73 (02) :533-545
[3]   Zoning eco-environmental vulnerability for environmental management and protection [J].
Anh Kim Nguyen ;
Liou, Yuei-An ;
Li, Ming-Hsu ;
Tuan Anh Tran .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2016, 69 :100-117
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2017, CHINA ECOL INDIC
[5]   The weight of interaction of mining activities: groundwater in environmental impact assessment using fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP) [J].
Aryafar, A. ;
Yousefi, S. ;
Ardejani, F. Doulati .
ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2013, 68 (08) :2313-2324
[6]   Extended fuzzy analytic hierarchy process approach in water and environmental management (case study: Lake Urmia Basin, Iran) [J].
Azarnivand, Ali ;
Hashemi-Madani, Farkhondeh Sadat ;
Banihabib, Mohammad Ebrahim .
ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2015, 73 (01) :13-26
[7]   Ecological vulnerability indicators [J].
Beroya-Eitner, Mary Antonette .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2016, 60 :329-334
[8]   FUZZY HIERARCHICAL ANALYSIS [J].
BUCKLEY, JJ .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1985, 17 (03) :233-247
[9]   Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment [J].
Chen, CT .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2000, 114 (01) :1-9
[10]  
Chen YN, 2008, HYDROGEOL J, V16, P1371, DOI 10.1007/s10040-008-0306-1