Attacking science on social media: How user comments affect perceived trustworthiness and credibility

被引:42
作者
Gierth, Lukas [1 ]
Bromme, Rainer [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Munster, Munster, Germany
[2] Univ Munster, Educ Psychol, Munster, Germany
关键词
epistemic trust; online credibility; science communication; science conflicts; user comments; SCIENTISTS; TRUST; CONFLICTS; IMPACT; GMOS;
D O I
10.1177/0963662519889275
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
The science on controversial topics is often heatedly discussed on social media, a potential problem for social-media-based science communicators. Therefore, two exploratory studies were performed to investigate the effects of science-critical user comments attacking Facebook posts containing scientific claims. The claims were about one of four controversial topics (homeopathy, genetically modified organisms, refugee crime, and childhood vaccinations). The user comments attacked the claims based on the thematic complexity, the employed research methods, the expertise, or the motivations of the researchers. The results reveal that prior attitudes determine judgments about the user comments, the attacked claims, and the source of the claim. After controlling for attitude, people agree most with thematic complexity comments, but the comments differ in their effect on perceived claim credibility only when the comments are made by experts. In addition, comments attacking researchers' motivations were more effective in lowering perceived integrity while scientists' perceived expertise remained unaffected.
引用
收藏
页码:230 / 247
页数:18
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   The "Nasty Effect:'' Online Incivility and Risk Perceptions of Emerging Technologies [J].
Anderson, Ashley A. ;
Brossard, Dominique ;
Scheufele, Dietram A. ;
Xenos, Michael A. ;
Ladwig, Peter .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION, 2014, 19 (03) :373-387
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2018, R LANG ENV STAT COMP
[3]   The effect of ad hominem attacks on the evaluation of claims promoted by scientists [J].
Barnes, Ralph M. ;
Johnston, Heather M. ;
MacKenzie, Noah ;
Tobin, Stephanie J. ;
Taglang, Chelsea M. .
PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (01)
[4]   Is It Believable When It's Scientific? How Scientific Discourse Style Influences Laypeople's Resolution of Conflicts [J].
Bromme, Rainer ;
Scharrer, Lisa ;
Stadtler, Marc ;
Hoemberg, Johanna ;
Torspecken, Ronja .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING, 2015, 52 (01) :36-57
[5]   Science, New Media, and the Public [J].
Brossard, Dominique ;
Scheufele, Dietram A. .
SCIENCE, 2013, 339 (6115) :40-41
[6]   Astroturfing Global Warming: It Isn't Always Greener on the Other Side of the Fence [J].
Cho, Charles H. ;
Martens, Martin L. ;
Kim, Hakkyun ;
Rodrigue, Michelle .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2011, 104 (04) :571-587
[7]   Web credibility assessment: Conceptualization, operationalization, variability, and models [J].
Choi, Wonchan ;
Stvilia, Besiki .
JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 66 (12) :2399-2414
[8]   Public opinion and trust in scientists: the role of the research context, and the perceived motivation of stem cell researchers [J].
Critchley, Christine R. .
PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2008, 17 (03) :309-327
[9]   Why do scientists disagree? Explaining and improving measures of the perceived causes of scientific disputes [J].
Dieckmann, Nathan F. ;
Johnson, Branden B. .
PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (02)
[10]   Public perceptions of expert disagreement: Bias and incompetence or a complex and random world? [J].
Dieckmann, Nathan F. ;
Johnson, Branden B. ;
Gregory, Robin ;
Mayorga, Marcus ;
Han, Paul K. J. ;
Slovic, Paul .
PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2017, 26 (03) :325-338