Arguing for a knowledge-base in language teacher education, then (1998) and now (2018)

被引:44
作者
Freeman, Donald [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Educ, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
ELT; language teacher education; professional development; teacher learning; TESOL;
D O I
10.1177/1362168818777534
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This article examines how the concept of a knowledge-base in language teacher education has changed since the 1998 proposal. Arguing that a knowledge-base evolves in two ways: through changes in the field of knowledge, and through changes driven by the work that knowledge supports, I describe two problems: 'translating' theory into practice and the 'positionality' of those defining what counts as knowledge. The 1998 proposal outlined a work-driven framework in response to the former without fully acknowledging the latter: who is doing English language teaching, with whom, and to what ends. Revising the knowledge-base now depends on taking that positionality into account. With this in mind, I suggest three concepts - of teacher language use (English-for-Teaching), participation and agency, and professional confidence as a measure of outcome - as work-driven alternatives to our present thinking.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 16
页数:12
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, COMM EUR FRAM LANG L
[2]  
Barkhuizen G., 2017, Reflections on language teacher identity research
[3]  
Canagarajah Suresh., 1999, Resisting Linguistic Imperialism in English Teaching
[4]   THE DYSFUNCTIONS OF THE THEORY/PRACTICE DISCOURSE [J].
CLARKE, MA .
TESOL QUARTERLY, 1994, 28 (01) :9-26
[5]  
Enever J., 2011, Early language learning in Europe
[6]  
Freeman D., 2017, LANGUAGE TEACHING AS
[7]  
Freeman D., 1996, VOICES LANGUAGE CLAS, P88
[8]  
Freeman D., 2016, ED 2 LANGUAGE TEACHE
[9]  
Freeman D., ROUTLEDGE HDB ENGLIS
[10]  
Freeman D., 2017, REGIONAL ENGLISH LAN, V48, P1