Patient-Reported Outcomes After Choice for Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy

被引:62
作者
Hwang, E. Shelley [1 ,2 ]
Locklear, Tracie D. [1 ,2 ]
Rushing, Christel N. [1 ,2 ]
Samsa, Greg [1 ,2 ]
Abernethy, Amy P. [1 ,2 ]
Hyslop, Terry [1 ,2 ]
Atisha, Dunya M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Duke Canc Inst, Durham, NC USA
[3] Univ S Florida, Tampa, FL USA
关键词
20-YEAR FOLLOW-UP; CANCER DATA-BASE; BREAST-CANCER; SATISFACTION; TRENDS; RECONSTRUCTION; SURGERY; RATES; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2015.61.5427
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose The rate of contralateral prophylactic mastectomies (CPMs) continues to rise, although there is little evidence to support improvement in quality of life (QOL) with CPM. We sought to ascertain whether patient-reported outcomes and, more specifically, QOL differed according to receipt of CPM. Methods Volunteers recruited from the Army of Women with a history of breast cancer surgery took an electronically administered survey, which included the BREAST-Q, a well-validated breast surgery outcomes patient-reporting tool, and demographic and treatment-related questions. Descriptive statistics, hypothesis testing, and regression analysis were used to evaluate the association of CPM with four BREAST-Q QOL domains. Results A total of 7,619 women completed questionnaires; of those eligible, 3,977 had a mastectomy and 1,598 reported receipt of CPM. Women undergoing CPM were younger than those who did not choose CPM. On unadjusted analysis, mean breast satisfaction was higher in the CPM group (60.4 v 57.9, P < .001) and mean physical well-being was lower in the CPM group (74.6 v 76.6, P < .001). On multivariable analysis, the CPM group continued to report higher breast satisfaction (P = .046) and psychosocial well-being (P = .017), but no difference was reported in the no-CPM group in the other QOL domains. Conclusion Choice for CPM was associated with an improvement in breast satisfaction and psychosocial wellbeing. However, the magnitude of the effect may be too small to be clinically meaningful. Such patient-reported outcomes data are important to consider when counseling women contemplating CPM as part of their breast cancer treatment. (C) 2016 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
引用
收藏
页码:1518 / +
页数:15
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Aaronson N, 2002, QUAL LIFE RES, V11, P193
  • [2] RATING FORMULATION FOR ORDERED RESPONSE CATEGORIES
    ANDRICH, D
    [J]. PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1978, 43 (04) : 561 - 573
  • [3] [Anonymous], GUID IND PAT REP OUT
  • [4] A National Snapshot of Satisfaction with Breast Cancer Procedures
    Atisha, Dunya M.
    Rushing, Christel N.
    Samsa, Gregory P.
    Locklear, Tracie D.
    Cox, Charlie E.
    Hwang, E. Shelley
    Zenn, Michael R.
    Pusic, Andrea L.
    Abernethy, Amy P.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 22 (02) : 361 - 369
  • [5] Partnering With Engaged Patients Accelerates Research
    Atisha, Dunya M.
    Locklear, Tracie D.
    Rogers, Ursula A.
    Rushing, Christel N.
    Samsa, Gregory P.
    Abernethy, Amy P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 109 (05) : 504 - 505
  • [6] Interpreting Clinical Differences in BREAST-Q Scores: Minimal Important Difference
    Cano, Stefan J.
    Klassen, Anne F.
    Scott, Amie
    Alderman, Amy
    Pusic, Andrea L.
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2014, 134 (01) : 173E - 175E
  • [7] The BREAST-Q: Further Validation in Independent Clinical Samples
    Cano, Stefan J.
    Klassen, Anne F.
    Scott, Amie M.
    Cordeiro, Peter G.
    Pusic, Andrea L.
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2012, 129 (02) : 293 - 302
  • [8] Monitoring patient-centered outcomes through the progression of breast reconstruction: a multicentered prospective longitudinal evaluation
    Chao, Li-Fen
    Patel, Ketan M.
    Chen, Shin-Cheh
    Lam, Hung-Bun
    Lin, Chia-Yu
    Liu, Hsueh-Erh
    Cheng, Ming-Huei
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2014, 146 (02) : 299 - 308
  • [9] FISCHER GH, 1995, RASCH MODELS, P15
  • [10] Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer
    Fisher, B
    Anderson, S
    Bryant, J
    Margolese, RG
    Deutsch, M
    Fisher, ER
    Jeong, J
    Wolmark, N
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 347 (16) : 1233 - 1241